Shared posts

29 Apr 18:15

The most Googled products in every country in one crazy map

by Drake Baer

In popular culture, certain countries are stereotypically associated with certain products — beer in Germany, carpets in Turkey, electronics in Japan. 

But those things aren't what people are really searching for. 

Earlier this month, the cost-estimating website Fixr.com put together a map of the world with the most-Googled for object in each country, using the autocomplete formula of "How much does * cost in [x country]."

While the results are far from scientific — since Google autocomplete results vary based on the searcher's history, the time of search, and the place of search — they do say at least a little bit about how countries are perceived. 

Some of the fascinating (and troubling) results: 

• People want to know how much a MIG aircraft costs in Russia

• People want to know how much a prostitute costs in Brazil

• People want to know how much rhinoplasty costs in South Korea

Here are the maps. 

The World

World1 map google words

Africa 1Asia 1Europe 1South America 1North america 2 1 Australia 1

Antartica 1

SEE ALSO: 5 American habits I had to give up when I traveled for 22 months straight

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Watch these giant container ships collide near the Suez Canal








29 Apr 14:06

The New World of Whiteboards, From Smart Markers to Surface Hub

by Lauren Goode
Whiteboards are getting "smarter" -- but they're still not cheap.
28 Apr 16:17

Lenovo announces $199 ThinkCentre Chromebox, arriving in June to integrate with Tiny-In-One workstation (Kevin Tofel/ZDNet)

Kevin Tofel / ZDNet:
Lenovo announces $199 ThinkCentre Chromebox, arriving in June to integrate with Tiny-In-One workstation  —  Lenovo's new ThinkCentre Chromebox: The right size for small business  —  Summary:Lenovo's new $199 Chromebox can be out of sight on employee desks: Just attach it to the back of Lenovo's Tiny …

28 Apr 16:16

14 meaningless phrases that will make you sound like a stock-market wizard

by Henry Blodget

cnbc

If you follow stock-market punditry obsessively like we do, you'll quickly notice something.

A handful of analysts speak English. But the vast majority don't.

Rather, they speak a language unique to the investment business.

This language consists of market phrases that sound intelligent but don't mean anything.

The phrases don't sound like they don't mean anything, of course. On the contrary, they sound like they mean a lot. In fact, they make the speaker sound as wise as Warren Buffett (who, to his great credit, never speaks this way). 

Most of these phrases have another key benefit, which is useful in the investment business: They never commit the speaker to any specific recommendation or prediction. In other words, no matter what happens, the analyst can always be "right" and never be "wrong" — because they didn't actually say anything.

So if you want to sound smart about investing without really saying anything, read on.

"The easy money has been made."

When to use it: Any time a market or stock has already gone up a lot.

Why it's smart-sounding: It implies wise, prudent caution. It implies that you bought or recommended the stock a long time ago, before the easy money was made (and are therefore smart). It suggests that there might be further upside, but that there might be future downside, because the stock is "due for a correction" (another smart-sounding meaningless phrase that you can use all the time). It does not commit you to any specific recommendation or prediction. It protects you from all possible outcomes: If the stock drops, you can say, "As I said ... " If the stock goes up, you can say "As I said ... "

Why it's meaningless: It's a statement about the obvious. It's a description of what has happened, not what will happen. It requires no special insight or power of analysis. It tells you nothing that you don't already know. Also, it's not true: The money that has been made was likely in no way "easy." Buying stocks that are rising steadily is a lot "easier" than buying stocks that the market has left for dead (because everyone thinks you're stupid to buy stocks that no one else wants to buy.)



"I'm cautiously optimistic."

A classic. Can be used in almost all circumstances and market conditions.

When to use it: Pretty much anytime.

Why it's smart-sounding: It implies wise, prudent caution, but also a sunny outlook, which most people like. (Nobody likes a bear, especially in a bull market.) It sounds more reasonable than saying, for example, "The stock is a screaming buy and will go straight up from here." It protects the speaker against all possible outcomes. If the market drops, the speaker can say, "As you know, I was cautious ... " If the market goes up, the speaker can say, "As you know, I was optimistic ... "

Why it's meaningless: It's too general to mean anything. It can accurately describe any market outcome in history, merely by adjusting the unspecified time frame. (If you were "cautiously optimistic" in 1929, you were "cautious," which was good, and you were also optimistic, which was also good. Eventually, the market recovered!)



"It's a stockpicker's market."

Another classic. Sounds smart but is completely meaningless.

When to use it: Especially useful in bear markets or flat markets, but can be used anytime.

Why it's smart-sounding: It suggests that the current market environment is different from other market environments and therefore requires special skill to navigate. It implies that the speaker has this skill. It suggests that, if you're talented enough to be a "stockpicker," you can coin money right now — while everyone else drifts sideways or loses their shirts. 

Why it's meaningless: If you pick stocks for a living (or for your personal account), all markets are "stockpickers' markets." In all markets, traders are trying to buy winners and sell dogs, and in all markets only half of these traders succeed. (It's a different half each time, of course — and most of the "winnings" of the winners are wiped out by transaction costs and taxes, but that's a different story). It is no easier (or harder) to win the stockpicking game in a flat or bear market than in a bull market, and if you try, you'll almost certainly do worse than if you had just bought an index fund.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider






28 Apr 16:15

The scientific reason why Barack Obama and Mark Zuckerberg wear the same outfit every day

by Drake Baer

zuckerberg obama

Barack Obama's days are packed with decisions that come from running the most powerful country on Earth. 

Mark Zuckerberg's days are packed with decisions that come from running the most powerful social network on Earth. 

They each wear basically the same thing every day: Obama a blue or gray suit, Zuckerberg a gray T-shirt. 

And they do it for the same reason: decisions. 

As in, they have to make tons of decisions all the time. And there's only so much mental energy in a given day, even if you're the leader of the free world or a wunderkind Harvard dropout. 

Psychologists call it decision fatigue

"Making decisions uses the very same willpower that you use to say no to doughnuts, drugs, or illicit sex," says Roy F. Baumeister, a psychologist who studies decision fatigue and a co-author of "Willpower: Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength."

"It's the same willpower that you use to be polite or to wait your turn or to drag yourself out of bed or to hold off going to the bathroom," Baumeister told the New York Times. "Your ability to make the right investment or hiring decision may be reduced simply because you expended some of your willpower earlier when you held your tongue in response to someone's offensive remark or when you exerted yourself to get to the meeting on time."

As Obama told Vanity Fair in 2012, managing your life as a president requires that you cut away the mundane, frustrating decisions like deciding what to wear — which people around the world fret over

"You'll see I wear only gray or blue suits," he said. "I'm trying to pare down decisions. I don't want to make decisions about what I'm eating or wearing. Because I have too many other decisions to make." 

Mark ZuckerbergZuckerberg said basically the same thing last November. 

"I really want to clear my life to make it so that I have to make as few decisions as possible about anything except how to best serve this community," he said, meaning he doesn't want to spend mental energy on deciding what to wear or what to eat for breakfast. 

"I'm in this really lucky position, where I get to wake up every day and help serve more than a billion people. And I feel like I'm not doing my job if I spend any of my energy on things that are silly or frivolous about my life," he said.

Zuckerberg said he drew the always-wear-the-same thing philosophy from Obama and a certain other tech executive, Steve Jobs. Jobs wore blue jeans and a black turtleneck nearly every single day. It provided him a signature style — and a daily convenience. 

But wearing the same thing every day doesn't mean you have to look like a Silicon Valley type. 

For three years, art director Matilda Kahl has worn the same stylish white silk top and black pants every day.

matilda kahl one outfit woman

SEE ALSO: 9 scientifically verified ways to appear more attractive

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Watch these giant container ships collide near the Suez Canal








28 Apr 06:06

You had 'one' job, BlackBerry — grammar gaffe appears in company's advertising

by Lara O'Reilly

"One" and "won" are homonyms — words that sound the same but have different meanings (and spellings, in this case).

To mix up the two is an unfortunate (but easy) mistake to make. It looks as if BlackBerry has learned about it the hard way Monday as this ad, seen on Variety's homepage, demonstrates.

blackberry has one

As the ad in question is "Sponsored Content," we don't know whether someone at BlackBerry or Variety made the gaffe. We've contacted BlackBerry and Variety for comment.

Nevertheless, congratulations for "oneing" that award, BlackBerry!

SEE ALSO: Vertu CEO explains typo in one of its ads

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 5 subliminal sex messages hidden in ads for wholesome brands








24 Apr 22:30

Apple was blocking some app updates because they said they worked with a rival to the Apple Watch (AAPL)

by Steve Kovach

Pebble Time smartwatch

Apple blocked updates to apps that said they are compatible with the Pebble, one of the biggest rivals to the Apple Watch, for a few days this week.

According to sources familiar with the issue, Apple wouldn't publish updates to apps if they said they were compatible with Pebble. It all started this week, and there was no issue before. In fact, Pebble's own app was updated just last week. The Apple Watch launched Friday.

An Apple spokesperson told Business Insider that apps won't be denied on the grounds that they work with Pebble .

Apple was denying the apps under rule 3.1 of the App Store developer rules, which says apps cannot work with rival mobile platforms, according to sources.

Here's what rule 3.1 says:

Apps or metadata that mentions the name of any other mobile platform will be rejected.

Technically, Apple didn't have a rival platform to Pebble until this week, which could explain why Apple's reviewers started blocking updates to Pebble-compatible apps.

A developer for the app SeaNav came forward this week and said Apple denied his app update on the grounds that it worked with Pebble. The update to Seanav is now live in the App Store.

Pebble is launching its new smartwatch, the Pebble Time, in a few weeks.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Kids settle the debate and tell us which is better: an Apple or Samsung phone








24 Apr 14:07

Microsoft Cloud Revenue is Really Growing Fast

by Gary Kim
It remains difficult to precisely estimate the amount of cloud service revenue Microsoft actually generates, as it once was difficult to determine the size of Amazon’s Amazon Web Services business.

Microsoft’s cloud revenue is spread across a couple of business units, and also is bundled with revenue from non-related products.   

IDC expects the overall cloud infrastructure market to top $32 billion in 2015, with public cloud claiming $21 billion of the market, roughly double its private cloud peer.

Until a day ago, it has been guesswork to determine how much of that public cloud market is owned by Amazon. As it turns out, analyst estimates were very close, estimating AWS revenue at roughly $5 billion in mid-2014.

Analyst Karl Keirstead at Deutsche Bank, had estimated current AWS annual revenue of about $6 billion. As it turns out, that is the current run rate.

Microsoft now is viewed as the number two provider, by revenue share, with a blistering sales growth rate. Some think Microsoft’s cloud revenue run rate (the most recent quarter, times four) is about $4 billion annually.  
24 Apr 03:38

Microsoft's two traditional cash cows, Windows and Office, are shrinking like crazy

by Matt Weinberger

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella

Microsoft may have beat Wall Street expectations on profit and revenue in its third quarter of fiscal year 2015, but that's no thanks to the good old PC. 

The good news for Microsoft is that its enterprise cloud has a projected run rate of $6.3 billion this year. That's up from $5.5 billion just three months ago

But the bad news is that Microsoft's old traditional business — licensing software like Windows and Office for use on new PCs — is shrinking like crazy, amid a tougher market for PCs in general.

Overall, Microsoft's Devices and Consumer Licensing business, the catch-all unit responsible for Microsoft Windows on new PCs, consumer versions of Microsoft Office, and Windows Phone on phones from other manufacturers, was down 24% from last year, a dip of about $1.1 billion.

Microsoft Windows licensing revenue for businesses fell 19%, and fell 26% for consumers, for an overall 22% dip in revenue. Microsoft blames this on the generally weak PC market, hard comparables with last year (when a deadline for the end of Windows XP support drove a lot of PC upgrades), and a general trend towards cheaper devices.

Meanwhile, Microsoft Office consumer revenue was down 41%, and Microsoft Office commercial revenue was down 16%. (Note that business versions of Office roll up into a different financial segment, Commercial Licensing.)

Microsoft cites this as a side-effect of huge growth in Microsoft Office 365, which has a subscription-based model. It also blamed slow PC sales — the fewer PCs sold, the fewer people and companies buy Office for them.

Also, Microsoft Office is pre-installed on a lot of new PCs in Japan, and the weak PC market there cuts into that business, Microsoft says. 

All of which adds up to a strange conclusion: The businesses and technologies that made Microsoft so successful in the first place are slowly fading in favor of the cloud.

That's going to cause some short-term pain, but at least Microsoft has prepared for the shift, and its cloud growth is a nice bright spot. Plus, it's always possible that Windows 10, expected out at the end of July, will drive growth in the PC market again, as Windows 8 failed to do.

Investors don't seem worried — the stock rose more than 3% after hours.

 

SEE ALSO: Microsoft is climbing after hours after it beats on profit and revenue

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Watch Microsoft's Insane Holographic Computer In Action








23 Apr 21:39

Eric Schmidt: Here are the three most important things Google is working on

by Matt Weinberger

Google Chairman Eric Schmidt

Google's self-driving cars and robots get a lot of press, but the company's real future is in machine learning, the technology that enables computers to get smarter and more personal, says Google Chairman Eric Schmidt.

Schmidt's remarks came during a conversation with Box CEO Aaron Levie on stage at BoxDev 2015, the newly-public cloud storage company's developer event in San Francisco. 

During the conversation, Levie tried to steer the conversation towards Google's robotics projects. Schmidt chided him for focusing on what he called the company's "5%, 10% projects."  

"The core thing Google is working on is basically machine learning," Schmidt says. 

There are three technologies Google is working to rapidly improve, Schmidt says: 

  • Voice recognition, which Google did a lot of pioneering work on "even though Siri gets all the credit," Schmidt says. 
  • Image recognition, which lets Google place pictures into intelligent categories. 
  • Machine learning, which enables Google to learn more about its users over time and provide personal results. 

"Then we can begin to suggest things," says Schmidt.

As for those robots, Schmidt says that Google really believes self-driving cars are the future.

"A hundred years from now, people are going to laugh when they see a movie and people get in a car and drive in it," Schmidt says.

"Yeah, why didn't they just get an Uber," Levie joked in response. 

SEE ALSO: Google Chairman Eric Schmidt describes what the Internet is like in North Korea

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: NASA’s new robotic car makes Google's look lame








23 Apr 21:36

ALU Jumps Back into Enterprise Communications

By Eric Krapf
Just-announced Rapport platform offers cloud-based, next-gen architecture for large enterprises.
23 Apr 21:32

Amazon just revealed that it has a profitable, $6 billion beast of a business (AMZN, MSFT, IBM, GOOG)

by Julie Bort

andy jassy aws

At long last, Amazon has finally revealed numbers for its cloud computing service, Amazon Web Services. $1.57 billion in the first quarter. This was around what most analysts had predicted — about $6 billion per year.

It's also profitable. It earned $265 million this quarter, putting it on track for $1 billion a year in profits.

This also gave concrete proof to what nearly everyone in the industry expected: Amazon is, by at least one measure, the biggest cloud computing infrastructure player of them all.

IBM wants to dispute that. Last week it told us, when you combine all the things it calls a cloud: on a trailing twelve-month basis its cloud revenue was $7.7 billion.

But it also clarified that its the things that it is selling "as-a-Service" is on track to do $3.8 billion. That's a more apples-to-apples comparison to the kind of cloud that Amazon sells.

IBM is well known for selling something called the hybrid cloud, which is when companies buy hardware and software the old-fashioned way, and install it in their data centers but set it up so that it can tap into IBM's cloud (hosted elsewhere) if they need more storage, or compute power or what-have-you.

IBM also does well in "private cloud" which is when companies remodel their data centers with hardware and software to mimic the big internet companies, which are are fast and efficient.

Microsoft's cloud services are at $6.3 billion a year. Microsoft on Thursday also revealed its latest cloud computing numbers — its cloud computing business is on track to pull revenues of $6.3 billion this year.

But this also isn't quite apples to apples. Microsoft includes its software-as-a-service apps, Office 365 and Dynamics CRM (a Salesforce competitor) in its cloud revenue. Its cloud infrastructure service, Azure, competes most directly against AWS. And it's some smaller portion of that $6.3 billion total. One person has told Business Insider that Azure revenue is at $1 billion lifetime since its debut in 2011, but is accelerating quickly.

Google earns about $7 billion a year from all non-advertising businesses. Google is thought to be behind Amazon, Microsoft and IBM in this race (but catching up fast). Google also released earnings this afternoon, and it said that its "Other" segment, which includes all its enterprise apps and its nascent cloud computing business, had revenues of $1.75 billion this quarter, or $7 billion a year.

But once again, this includes all businesses at Google outside of advertising, so there's a lot more than cloud computing in there. 

At stake is hundreds of billions of dollars in future revenue as companies stop buying all their own tech and start renting more of it from cloud providers.

 

SEE ALSO: Amazon beats, stock jumps, and its cloud business is quite profitable

Join the conversation about this story »








21 Apr 23:38

Hackers can easily use Wifi to crash your entire phone, and there's nothing you can do to avoid it

by Cale Guthrie Weissman

Business Men Using Phones

Many people think denial of service (DoS) attacks only happen to company websites and their servers.

DoS attacks occur when hackers send endless traffic to one source, which causes it to crash. Github was recently a victim of this. 

But DoS attacks are not merely relegated to websites. In fact, researchers have proven it's possible to attack iOS devices, crashing either individual apps or entire mobile phones.

Mobile security firm Skycure unveiled its latest research at the RSA security conference in San Francisco on Tuesday. The firm showed how attackers can create malicious Wi-Fi networks to crash mobile devices with incredible accuracy. 

Skycure's CEO Adi Sharabani told Business Insider most people think of app crashes as fleeting technical issues than cyber attacks. 

"When people see a crash, they think of it from the perspective of a bug," he said.  

But his company decided to research crashes from an offensive perspective: Is it possible to set up a program that, when deployed, can crash a phone? It turns out — at least for iOS devices — it is.

All the hacker has to do is create a wireless network for phones to join. Once the device is linked up to the network, the attacker can launch a script which can cause the phone to crash.

At the heart of this research is an older problem with iOS devices, dubbed WiFiGate. In 2013, Skycure proved it is possible for attackers to create a network and have mobile devices automatically join it, as long as the phone has already connected to another Wifi with the same name (for example, "Free Public WiFi").

Putting these two facts together, Sharabani explained that large targeted attacks could happen in highly populated areas. For instance, someone could go to Times Square and make a network called "AT&T Wi-Fi" and thousands of phones would automatically be connected. Then the attackers could easily shut down all of these phones by launching a DoS attack script.

In some cases, Skycure was able to cause a phone to constantly reboot then crash again, reverting it back to the useless piece of metal it once was.  

"There's nothing you can do to avoid [this type of] attack," said the CEO. 

Skycure's blog explains that it's best to avoid the free networks people find in the street providing public internet access. 

Skycure has contacted Apple about this issue, but it's not clear whether it has issued a complete fix or not. 

SEE ALSO: A cheap device you can buy on Amazon or Craigslist may be what's causing a huge uptick in car burglaries

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Kids settle the debate and tell us which is better: an Apple or Samsung phone








21 Apr 16:53

Checking In on Hospitality

By Dave Michels
Analog phones may still be prevalent in this vertical, but innovative UC examples are starting to pop up around the globe.
21 Apr 16:53

India Tech Startups: Seven Things That Blew My Mind

by Jason Del Rey
WhatsApp's influence, super-cheap Uber rides and fear of the b-word.
18 Apr 16:09

How Steve Jobs became the greatest businessman the world has ever known (AAPL)

by Jay Yarow

Laurene Powell Steve Jobs

A vegan college dropout who took acid and traveled to India for spiritual enlightenment, Steve Jobs was the greatest businessman in history.

But Jobs' ascent was neither simple nor straightforward.

Jobs' life story is well known to many, but as a quick reminder: Jobs was kicked out of Apple, a company he founded, in the 1980s, returned to it in the late '90s, and eventually turned Apple into the world's most valuable company before he died of cancer in 2011.

In addition to his success at Apple, he was the CEO of Pixar, one of the most successful animation studios ever.

Jobs bought Pixar from George Lucas for $5 million in 1985 and sold it to Disney for $7.4 billion in 2006. For anyone else, Pixar would be in the lead paragraph of a story about one's talents as a businessman. For Jobs, it's the fourth paragraph.

As with any great success in the world, people want to know how Jobs did it. How did Steve Jobs become so successful?

Jobs' story is intriguing, because early in his career it seemed as if he couldn't get out of his own way. Sure, he launched the Apple I computer, the Apple II computer, and the Macintosh, but he was a rough boss.

He was exacting on employees, and sometimes insulting. It was a mistake that he was pushed out of Apple. But it wasn't necessarily a surprise. He was a difficult person to deal with.

How did Jobs go from brilliant but flawed visionary to the greatest businessman in history? Brent Schlender and Rick Tetzeli tackle this question in a 412-page look at Jobs' career, "Becoming Steve Jobs: The Evolution of a Reckless Upstart into a Visionary Leader."

Their book relies heavily on Schlender's relationship with Jobs, which started in April 1986 when he visited Jobs at his then new company, NeXT, for The Wall Street Journal. Over the decades to come, the two developed a friendship of sorts, though Schlender says it was always a professional relationship in which he saw Jobs as a source. (Jobs used to dish Schlender gossip about what was happening at Apple after Jobs was booted from the company.)

"Becoming Steve Jobs" got full participation, and tacit endorsement, from Apple. The authors had access to Jobs' closest coworkers during the end of his time at Apple. CEO Tim Cook, SVP Eddy Cue, SVP Jony Ive, and former head of PR Katie Cotton spoke on the record for the book. There are interviews with other former Apple executives. They also spoke to Jobs' widow, Laurene Powell Jobs.

Apple's participation seems to be a concerted effort to take control of Jobs' legacy.

Before he died, Jobs gave unprecedented access to Walter Isaacson for an authorized biography. While that book has become the definitive tome on Jobs thanks to the access, Jobs' closest friends and family have a dim view of it.

Ive, Apple's head of design and Jobs' closest professional partner, recently said of the book, "My regard couldn't be any lower." He felt the book was riddled with inaccuracies.

Cook told the authors of "Becoming Steve Jobs":

I thought the Isaacson book did him a tremendous disservice. It was just a rehash of a bunch of stuff that had already been written, and focused on small parts of his personality. You get the feeling that [Steve’s] a greedy, selfish egomaniac. It didn’t capture the person. The person I read about there is somebody I would never have wanted to work with over all this time.

It's been years since I read Isaacson's book, but I remember thinking the book felt flawed. After reading it I was left with two questions: Why did anyone want to work with Jobs? He seemed like an unbearable tyrant. And how did Jobs flip from being a petulant jerk in the 1980s to a brilliant CEO in the 2000s?

tim cook

Therefore I was excited to read "Becoming Steve Jobs." Alas, the book doesn't live up to the lofty expectations created by getting Apple's endorsement. That doesn't mean it's not a good book. If you have interest in Apple and Jobs, it's well worth the read. But it doesn't have a strong narrative, which makes it a somewhat slow read for a broader audience. It's like a 412-page magazine article on Jobs packed with great anecdotes and nuggets of news.

Having read the book, I have some theories on how Jobs transformed himself (I'll get to them in a bit). But Bill Gates has the best advice for anyone trying to figure out how to emulate Jobs' success.

"Maybe you should call your book Don't Try This at Home," Gates told the authors. "So many of the people who want to be like Steve have the asshole side down. What they're missing is the genius part."

This is the simple truth. Jobs' success was singular. Any attempt to re-create it will fall flat. If it were as easy as studying what he did and replicating it, we'd all be famous billionaires.

But that doesn't mean we can't learn more about Jobs from this book. After reading the book, here are three things that I think made him a monster success.

1. Jobs was supernaturally articulate.

This is a theme of the book.

Pixar president Ed Catmull said that whenever there was a problem with a film, he'd call Jobs and say, "Steve, I think we've got a problem." He wouldn't say anything else. Jobs would drive up to Pixar's offices. He would watch a film in a screening room with everyone. Then he offered his own take on what was wrong with the film.

"Steve never said anything that hadn't already been said by one of the other brain trust members. But there is something about his presence, and he was so articulate, that he could take the same thing said by somebody else and just cut right through it. Steve would preface it by saying, 'I'm not a filmmaker, you can ignore everything I say.' He literally said that every time. He would then just say what he thought the problem was. Right? Only, the fact that it was articulate was the gut punch. He didn't tell them to do anything, he just told them what he thought."

Ive, Jobs' closest partner at Apple, said something similar:

"He could refine and describe ideas so much better than anyone else could. I think very quickly he understood that I had a specific proficiency in terms of having good taste and understanding aesthetics and form. But one of my problems is that I'm not always as articulate as I would like to be. I can feel things intuitively, and Steve could sense the full meaning of what I was getting at. So I didn't have to justify it explicitly. And then what would happen was I would then see him articulate those ideas but in a way that I was completely incapable of doing. And that's what was so amazing. I learned, I got better at it, but obviously was never ever in his league."

Previously, Jobs' powers of persuasion were derided as a "reality-distortion field." But, really, this was one of Jobs' greatest strengths as a leader. The ability to clearly lay out what he wanted made Apple and Pixar stronger companies. A clear mind leads to great products. If CEOs can't express themselves, how are employees going to know what to do?

Jobs ability to articulate ideas wasn't exactly a state secret. He was smart in just about every interview he did. Here's a good example:

2. Jobs hired the right people and trusted them to do their jobs.

One theory from the book on why Jobs struggled in his first run at Apple is that he had the wrong people around him.

Today, technology companies have figured out how to let a founder run his company with proper guidance. Larry Page and Sergey Brin hired Eric Schmidt to be "adult supervision" as they built Google. Mark Zuckerberg had Sheryl Sandberg to help him build Facebook's business.

In 1976, Jobs didn't have the right adult supervision.

The authors say that Apple's first CEO, Michael Scott, was "not a great CEO." "He had the skills and personality of a COO — a chief operating officer," they write. He was "frazzled" by the lack of stability at Apple as it tackled the personal-computing market.

Apple's next CEO, John Sculley, turned out to be "the wrong guy" for the job, according to Jobs. Sculley forced Jobs out of the company, which Sculley later admitted was a mistake.

John Sculley Apple ComputerBy the time Jobs came back to Apple, in 1997, he was the boss. And he installed a team of executives he trusted. He let those people do their jobs, interfering only when it made sense to do so.

Ron Johnson, who led retail for Apple, said when he first started at Apple, in 2000, Jobs mostly talked to him about personal matters. Johnson says Jobs told him early on, "I want to be good friends, because once you know how I think we only have to talk once or twice a week. Then when you want to do something you can do it and not feel that you have to ask permission."

This cuts counter to the idea that Jobs was a domineering micromanager. Jobs jumped in on certain projects, but he felt comfortable enough with his executive team to let them do their jobs.

3. Jobs stopped chasing the revolutionary and started accepting the evolutionary.

Steve Jobs

As I said earlier, there's no single answer to the question of how Steve Jobs became Steve Jobs. But this might be the closest we get.

When Jobs was at Apple in the '80s, he was obsessed with creating world-changing products. This was good for the world but came at a cost for Apple.

The best example of this was the original Macintosh. Jobs was pulled from working on the Lisa computer in 1980. He was shifted to working on the Macintosh, which was supposed to be a $1,000 personal computer. Jobs quickly decided that he didn't want to make a $1,000 computer. He ousted the person who had been leading the project. He spent $1 million, installed the Mac team in its own building, and hoisted a pirate flag in front of it. Four years later, he released a $1,995 computer.

While the Mac is celebrated as a landmark achievement, the authors of "Becoming Steve Jobs" say it was flawed. They say the computer was underpowered. Sales tanked in the second half of 1984, and the Apple II still accounted for 70% of Apple's sales. At the same time IBM's PC sales took off, and that led to Windows dominating the PC market.

When Jobs returned to Apple, his first move was to simplify the product line focusing on four products: a consumer laptop, a professional laptop, a consumer desktop, and a professional desktop computer. He didn't come back and say "We need to reinvent the wheel." He just wanted to refine the products that existed.

After those products were stable, in 2001, Apple released the iPod, which took time to become a blockbuster.

The book makes it sound as if in the early years Jobs was impatient. He wanted product hit after hit. Later in his career, he was happy to refine his hit products, which is what he did with the iPod and the iPhone.

4. Bonus: the real reason.

Steve Jobs MacBook AirWhile all of these explanations provide some insight into how Jobs became Jobs, really the world caught up to him.

Look at the authors' description of the original Macintosh:

Truth is, the Mac that Steve had delivered was deeply flawed. It was a brilliant piece of engineering and a gorgeous vision of where computing could go, but it was far too underpowered to be useful. Trying to hold the Mac to a $1,995 retail price, he had refused to include more than 128K of memory — about a tenth of what came with the higher-priced Lisa. The Mac's bitmapping technology soaked up the power. The lines and characters that appeared on its screen were pretty, but they sometimes took forever to show up. In fact, the original Mac did just about everything at a glacial pace. It came with a floppy disk drive rather than a hard drive, so copying files from one floppy disk to another was an arduous process in which the user had to pop the two floppies in and out of the computer multiple times. Adding to the machine's woes: the Mac launched with hardly any software, because the operating system was still being tweaked right up to the day of the launch. No wonder sales dried up. In his effort to realize a vision, Steve had slighted the machine's utility.

That sounds pretty damning. And yet it could apply to just about every single Apple product launched by Jobs in his second run at Apple.

The first iPod held only 1,000 songs. It cost $399, versus $100 for a CD player at the time. But very quickly its storage expanded. The product got cheaper. Everything about it improved.

The first iPhone was missing a lot of key features. The original MacBook Air was an expensive, underpowered computer. Even today, the Apple Watch is limited. As is the new MacBook.

That's how it works in technology. The first product won't be perfect. It's a glimpse of the future. Apple refines its idea over years, and eventually the technology catches up and it becomes the defining product in its category.

In 1985, Apple's board, and the world, didn't see that. By 1997, when Jobs returned, the world was finally ready for him. And Jobs was ready for the world. He was older and wiser. He had a family, which made him more mellow. Add it all up, and we start to get a sense of how Jobs became Jobs. It's not the most satisfying answer, but it's closest to the truth.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Kids settle the debate and tell us which is better: an Apple or Samsung phone








17 Apr 18:45

We just got a closer look at Microsoft Office 2016, and here are the features we're most excited about (MSFT)

by Lisa Eadicicco

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella Windows 10 event

Microsoft just announced that it's bringing its new version of Office that's optimized for tablets and phones to the Windows 10 Technical Preview for Windows Phone.

This means you'll be able to see exactly how Office 2016 will work on Microsoft's mobile devices by the end of the month.

And, at the same time, we're getting a more in-depth look at all of the new features in Office 2016 that will span across phones, tablets, and desktop/laptop computers, too.

The Technical Preview is a very early version of Windows 10 that gives Microsoft's commercial clients and businesses the chance to try out the new software. The Technical Preview usually precedes the Consumer Preview, which launches more closely to the software's final release. 

Microsoft is calling these new mobile apps "universal apps" because they work the same on both smartphones and tablets. 

After seeing a detailed demo of Office 2016 and trying it ourselves, here are some of the most interesting things we found:

  • The version of Microsoft Word that's optimized for phones and tablets is much easier to use on smaller screens. Microsoft has moved the blue ribbon that includes all of the menu options to the bottom of the screen instead of the top, so that you can easily reach it with your thumb. This will probably make it easier to read and edit documents while using your phone with one hand.OfficeWord2016.JPG
  • One of my favorite new features in the mobile version of Excel is that the Functions menu looks much cleaner. As soon as you tap the Functions field, an easy-to-read drop-down menu with all of the available functions appears.
  • The new "Tell Me" feature in Word for the desktop also seems really useful. It's not just a help feature — it actually performs actions for you, instead of just telling you how to do them. So, for example, if you want to add a strikethrough to a specific word or phrase but don't know how to do it, you could just highlight the word and type "strikethrough" in the Tell Me field and it will take care of it for you. 
  • Attaching files to emails also seems much easier in the new version of Outlook. When you add an attachment, it will automatically pull up the most recent files you've worked on across any Office app regardless of where it resides on your computer. OfficeInsights
  • The new "Insights" engine in the desktop version of Word 2016 helps you look up information on the web more quickly. All you need to do is highlight a word, and the Insights engine will fetch information and resources about that particular subject from the Internet. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 6 shortcuts in Excel that will save you a ton of time








17 Apr 02:30

Nokia to acquire Alcatel-Lucent

Two major European telecom equipment makers are set to merge in a multi-billion dollar deal: Nokia, based in Finland, and Alcatel-Lucent, headquartered in France. These companies have been through a lot in the highly competitive market…

Nokia mobile phones used to be the greatest thing in telecom. I had one that survived being dropped on concrete pavement and driven over by a car. I also have fond memories of its Symbian smartphones, like the E71. Nokia used to have the largest market share of mobile phones, but that business vaporized as it couldn’t keep up with the onslaught of Android and iOS devices. It got so bad that the company had to unload its mobile phone business to Microsoft whose Windows Phone market share remains a distant third place. Microsoft got the assets for relatively cheap, and Nokia got the cash it needed. Now the Finnish company focuses on telecom equipment and infrastructure.

Alcatel-Lucent, on the other hand, started being an equipment manufacturer, merged with the famed Bell Labs, then expanded into the mobile phone business among others (readers will remember it owning then selling Genesys). Its business has seen an upturn in recent years, and its global customer footprint will nicely complement Nokia’s. The long-term benefit to come out of this merger, however, likely resides in the companies’ R&D prowess.

The greatest challenge? Besides the fact that these are two corporate behemoths, the merger deal will be scrutinized by the governments, especially with stricter European labor laws and regulations.

16 Apr 21:58

TSA's Investigation Into Groping Agents Ensured They Wouldn't Be Prosecuted

by Mike Masnick
By now, you may have heard the story about how two TSA agents at Denver International Airport were fired recently after it was revealed that they had worked out a scam by which one agent was able to grope and fondle the genitals of male passengers he found attractive. The plan involved him signalling to a colleague who was working the scanning computer. That agent would tell the computer that the individual being scanned was female, which apparently would set off an "anomaly" alert for the groin area, allowing the male TSA agent to conduct a "pat down" of that area. Leaving aside the fact that these computers even have "male" and "female" settings and it can determine an "anomaly in the genital area" if they don't match -- this kind of thing was exactly what many insisted was going to happen when the TSA put in place these advanced screening procedures. And if you think that this is the only case of it happening, well, then, you probably think the TSA doesn't rifle through and steal stuff from your luggage as well.

Now here's the thing: this only came out because the TSA agent blabbed about it to a colleague, who then reported it, leading to an investigation. Many people find it odd that the two TSA agents (who are still unnamed) merely lost their jobs, rather than got arrested for this activity. Chris Bray, over at TSA News (found via Amy Alkon -- herself no stranger to intrusive TSA searches), went and grabbed the actual Denver police report on the incident, revealing that it appears that the TSA set up its "investigation" in a manner to almost guarantee no criminal charges and that the names of the TSA agents would remain secret.

Specifically, the TSA was first told about this scheme on November 18th of 2014. First, it took nearly two months for the TSA to do anything about it, and it did not contact the police during this time. Instead, on Feburary 9th, TSA investigator Chris Higgins observed the screening area and saw the signal/button push/grope of the genitals. Higgins made no attempt to speak with or identify the victim of this assault (this is important). Instead, he just spoke with the two TSA agents who were terminated at some later time (exact date not clearly indicated). The Denver police were not told about any of this until over a month later, on March 19th, 2015, at which point they noted that without a named "victim" there wasn't much they could do.

On that same day, the inspector, Higgins, told the Denver police that he had also spoken with a deputy district attorney who had told him that without a victim, it was unlikely they could prosecute a case. It's unclear when that conversation took place, but it appears that the TSA had plenty of time to fire the TSA agents and make it basically impossible for the police to file a case before then telling the police what happened. As Bray notes, this all seems rather suspicious, as if the TSA's "investigation" was much more about covering up the TSA's misdeeds, rather than holding the agents responsible:

So in November of 2014, the TSA was warned that two of its officers were currently, actively conspiring to commit sexual assault. But the TSA did not notify the police about that anonymous tip. The Denver Police Department is the agency that regularly polices Denver International Airport; the DIA Bureau is listed on this directory.

If the TSA had notified the police about the tip in November, the police could have been watching the checkpoint to observe the groping incident that was instead witnessed by a TSA employee. But the police didn’t know about an allegation of active, current, ongoing sexual assault, because the TSA didn’t tell them.

And so an act of sexual assault occurred right in front of a TSA investigator — and the investigator let the victim walk away without approaching him and identifying him.

Then, in March 2015, the TSA informed the police of the allegation, and of the evidence of the event that a TSA investigator had personally witnessed more than a month before. But the TSA didn’t notify the police until both employees had been fired — in other words, until both participants in a scheme to commit sexual assault had been removed from the place in which they allegedly committed it.

It’s as if someone called the fire department to report a pile of cold ashes. The TSA waited to call the police until the passengers were long gone, the TSA officers alleged to have committed the crime were long gone, and the crime witnessed by a TSA investigator was more than a month old.

Isn't that convenient?

Bray asked the TSA why it didn't contact the police earlier, and received a boiler plate response about how "intolerable" the actions were, but no substantive response to Bray's actual questions.

Yes, the groping scheme is a scandal, but it seems like a much bigger scandal is how the TSA handled the case -- first allowing the criminal activities to go on for two months without notifying police, and then making sure that no one could be actually charged with a crime.

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story







16 Apr 21:15

Bitcoin is the world’s most dangerous idea

by Sander Duivestein
bitcoin
This research is courtesy of Sander Duivestein, professional speaker and trendwatcher at VINT, the International Research Institute of Sogeti A symbol for ‘nothing’ doesn’t seem to mean very much, but the biography of the number ‘zero’ shows what a dangerous idea it has been since its very first creation. The Sumerians of ancient Babylon invented it about 5,000 years ago, the Greeks banned it, the Hindus worshiped it, and the Church branded it as demonic figure that implied the negation of God. Rehabilitation started in northern Italy in the 13th century. Zero became the most important tool in mathematics. It enabled…

This story continues at The Next Web
16 Apr 20:49

WikiLeaks just published 30,000 documents from the Sony hack

by Ryan Gorman and Matt Johnston

Julian Assange

WikiLeaks has put the documents and emails obtained by hackers from Sony Pictures Entertainment in a searchable online database, the group announced on Thursday.

All 173,132 emails and 30,287 documents stolen from the movie studio late last year are now available for anyone to search, browse and view, founder Julian Assange said in a press release.

"This archive shows the inner workings of an influential multinational corporation," Assange said. "It is newsworthy and at the centre of a geo-political conflict. It belongs in the public domain ... WikiLeaks will ensure it stays there."

The reaction of Sony Pictures was fast and furious. The studio released a statement, according to the Los Angeles Times, condemning the act:

The attackers used the dissemination of stolen information to try to harm SPE and its employees, and now WikiLeaks regrettably is assisting them in that effort," said a Sony Pictures spokesperson in a statement. "We vehemently disagree with WikiLeaks’ assertion that this material belongs in the public domain and will continue to fight for the safety, security, and privacy of our company and its more than 6,000 employees.

The treasure trove of data shows the inner workings of one of Hollywood's biggest movie studios.

Information made public in the document dump ranges from political donations to President Barack Obama and New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and discussions about the studio's lawsuit against pirating site Megaupload to Sony's stable of movie stars and how it even spied on rival studios.

"Documents in the archive reveal the budget breakdown for Oliver Stone's rival picture Snowden, which is currently in production," said WikiLeaks.

The archive also reveals how many government officials were in regular contact with SPE, about 100 .gov email addresses can be found, which also included "connections to the US military-industrial complex," per WikiLeaks.

Details on lobbying efforts through various trade groups are also made public in the documents.

The emails and documents were initially stolen last year by hackers who call themselves the "Guardians of Peace," (GOP) a group that U.S. officials have said are affiliated with North Korea.

GOP scorched-earth campaign seemed to center around the impending Christmas Day release of "The Interview," which satirized the assassination of North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un.

The group made numerous threats including to blow up theaters showing the Seth Rogan-James Franco comedy which never materialized after all major cinema chains pulled the film from their screens and it was left to indie cinemas and streaming services.

In the days leading up the almost-cancellation of the movie's premier, GOP released documents and emails showing personal documents from several movie stars and also SPE executives' criticisms of Adam Sandler.

All computers and cell phones were abandoned in favor of fax machines and hand-written notes. A Slate report likened it to working in the Stone Age after it was revealed Sony Pictures' entire infrastructure was compromised.

The actions brought the movie studio to its knees.

Sony Pictures has since limped back to life and most people have forgotten about "The Interview." It appeared the scandal was finally in the rear-view mirror.

Until today. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is what happens to your brain and body when you check your phone before bed








16 Apr 19:44

Slack, a year-old group-messaging platform, is now officially a $2.8 billion company

by Lisa Eadicicco

Slack CEO Stewart Butterfield

Slack, the workplace chatting app, has raised a $160 million round at a $2.8 billion valuation, a company representative confirmed in an email to Business Insider.

The company rose from the ashes of a failed startup and launched its enterprise communications platform in early 2014. It now has 750,000 daily active users with 200,000 paid seats (users), which is more than double the number Slack had at the beginning of 2015.

The round includes Horizons Ventures, Digital Sky Technologies (DST Global), Index Ventures, Spark Capital, and Institutional Venture Partners (IVP) with the participation of past Slack investors including Accel Partners, Andreessen Horowitz, The Social+Capital Partnership, Google Ventures, and Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers.

News of the fundraising broke last month.

Slack has more than doubled its valuation over the past six months. In October, the company raised $120 million, valuing the company at $1.12 billion. This also comes less than two years after the app officially launched, in August 2013.

Social+Capital Partnership's Chamath Palihapitiya explained in a message on Twitter why his firm was excited about Slack's opportunity.

"We are starting to finally chip away at the company-wide monopoly Microsoft Outlook and Exchange have had around collaboration and communication," Palihapitiya wrote. "There are many tools that are good with small groups or departments, but Slack is the first product that has utility for the entire company."

He added: "It will be interesting to see what happens at Outlook, Exchange (and others) in a mobile-only world where messaging within and across companies becomes as easy as emailing does."

slack channel page

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: These Microsoft Excel Keyboard Shortcuts Will Save You Tons Of Time Where It Counts








16 Apr 18:28

Need Customer Service? Call? Email? Text? Carrier Pigeon?

By Martha Buyer
Try as they might, companies often miss the mark in trying to deliver a great call center experience.
16 Apr 18:23

Netflix Doesn’t Want to Kill HBO. It Wants to Kill TV.

by Peter Kafka
Reed Hastings has been saying it for years. But if you needed a reminder, he was happy to spell it out yesterday.
16 Apr 15:46

This chrome shower head sprays water and plays music at the same time [77% off]

by Insider Picks

Screen Shot 2015 04 15 at 1.35.02 PM

This shower head could completely shake up your daily routine.

The Rain Shower Speaker is a shower head that comes equipped with a wireless Bluetooth speaker.

The shower head itself is powerful, with three times more spray power than the standard showerhead.

The speaker can play music by connecting to any Bluetooth enabled device. It also lets you answer calls while you shower.

The magnetic speaker rests insider the shower head. It can be removed and used outside the shower, too.

"I have been thrilled with this shower head. The shower itself is very powerful, and the speaker is very clean and fun to listen to," one reviewer wrote.

H2oVibe rain shower speaker: $179.99 $41.9 [77% off]

Screen Shot 2015 04 15 at 1.35.23 PM

SEE ALSO: These 6 luxury headphone sets are up to 73% off right now

SEE ALSO: The 7 best headphones you can get this week for under $20

SEE ALSO: Master Excel and more with this course bundle to land your dream job [96% off]

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's what it takes to be President Obama's right-hand man








15 Apr 20:04

What's Going to Replace Email?

By Eric Krapf
Email, with its standard envelope icon, doesn't exactly evoke the future of communications.
14 Apr 19:47

This one chart shows the PC’s best days might be behind it

by Eugene Kim

For years, we’ve been hearing about the death of the PC, and the latest data paints a clearly shrinking market.

Worldwide PC shipments have continued to show negative growth in the past three years, according to data from the IDC and Gartner charted for us by BI Intelligence.  It seemed to recover a bit in the last couple of years, but dipped back to under negative-5% growth in the latest quarter.

IDC says PC shipments totaled 68.5 million units in the first quarter of 2015, down 6.7% from a year ago. Gartner had slightly better numbers at 71.7 million units shipped, but still down 5.2% from the previous year.

Yet, Gartner still predicted a slow and consistent growth in the long term, saying that mobile PCs such as notebooks, laptop-tablet hybrids, and Windows tablets will continue to make way into the market over the next five years.

bii sai cotd global pc shipments growth

SEE ALSO: This one chart shows how Facebook dominates online communication

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Apple sneaked in an annoying new feature in its latest iPhone iOS update — but there's also an upside








14 Apr 17:24

Tech stocks just blew through yet another bubble warning sign

by Jim Edwards

stop sign warning red light

The percentage of tech companies that are unprofitable when they file for IPOs has hit a new low, surpassing the previous low during the 2000 dotcom bubble, according to data from Jay R. Ritter, a professor of finance at the University of Florida.

The milestone will cause tech veterans to take a deep breath even as they enjoy close-to-zero unemployment, and hiring salaries start in the high five- and low six-figure range for coding/engineering skills. There are now 82 venture-backed "unicorn" companies valued at more than $1 billion, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Seeing unicorns all over the place is not in itself a sign of a bubble. But the fact that most companies are selling stock to the public before they're able to make profits is worrying.

Lack of profits does not mean a company is dysfunctional. Plenty of companies plough all their revenues, and investor capital, back into their businesses in hopes of growing. In fact, an extended period of non-profitability is more common than not in early stage tech companies.

Nonetheless, the fact that only 11% of 127 companies going public in 2014 were actually able to make money at the time suggests that investors have become forgiving when it comes to new companies with business models that are not yet fully proven out.

A large appetite for risk, of course, is a sign of a bubble.

Here is Ritter's data, as presented rather beautifully by The Information, where we saw it first. Go directly to The Information if you want an interactive version with the granular detail.

tech bubble

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How to supercharge your iPhone in only 5 minutes








14 Apr 16:44

Twilio adds video services

Twilio said it will support up to 4-way peer-to-peer calling, unlimited video connections, low latency relay and a mobile stack to deploy video on mobile platforms.






13 Apr 15:49

Thinking Back on Interoperability and EC15

By Andrew Prokop
Nine interoperability-related takeaways worth noting from Enterprise Connect Orlando.