Shared posts

08 Mar 09:48

The Kroog Vs. The Poverty Trap

by Zandar
Paul Krugman on GOP Rep. Paul Ryan's austerity budget, 2014 edition being a load of crap:

How so? Well, Ryan et al — conservatives in general — claim to care deeply about opportunity, about giving those not born into affluence the ability to rise. And they claim that their hostility to welfare-state programs reflects their assessment that these programs actually reduce opportunity, creating a poverty trap. As Ryan once put it,

"we don’t want to turn the safety net into a hammock that lulls able-bodied people to lives of dependency and complacency, that drains them of their will and their incentive to make the most of their lives."

OK, do you notice the assumption here? It is that reduced incentives to work mean reduced social mobility. Is there any reason to believe this as a general proposition?

The answer of course is "no".
 
In fact, the evidence suggests that welfare-state programs enhance social mobility, thanks to little things like children of the poor having adequate nutrition and medical care. And conversely,of course, when such programs are absent or inadequate, the poor find themselves in a trap they often can’t escape, not because they lack the incentive, but because they lack the resources.

I mean, think about it: Do you really believe that making conditions harsh enough that poor women must work while pregnant or while they still have young children actually makes it more likely that those children will succeed in life?

The answer to that is no as well, but that's why Republicans immediately jump from this national policy argument to individual shaming and blaming of the single mother in question and respond with some increasingly awful variation of "She's the one who doomed the child to a lack of social mobility.  Bitch should have either kept her legs closed or married the kid's father.  Why should the taxpayer pick up the tab for that bad decision?"

And then these moral beacons of caring nod and shrug and pat themselves on the back, because Tough Love.  We can never have a debate over the fallacy of "hard work = success" because we're too busy stuck in the fallacy of  "unmarried women having sex = cause of all social ills".

08 Mar 09:43

Clopping with the “Reignbow Pony Tail Plug”

by kittystryker

In case you weren’t aware, I’m a My Little Pony fan.

A massive My Little Pony fan.

I have a cutie mark tattooed on me that represents my personal passion- a Mont Blanc pen over Xena’s sword in an illustration I often say expresses that the pen may be mightier than the sword, but it’s good to know how to wield both.  I felt as cutie marks go, this most succinctly expressed who I am as a person, what drives me, what makes me tick. And with my love of multicoloured hair, it’s not much of a stretch to imagine me as a human My Little Pony!

I’ve giggled for a while about doing pony play as a My Little Pony, but hadn’t really investigated it because I would need to find custom pony tails. Most tails are black, with pony hoods and harnesses also being black and, maybe, red. Not really the candy-coloured fantasy of my childhood pony friends! For a while I just filed it away as something for clopfic (clopping being a brony term for wanking) rather than reality.

But then I found out about Crystal Delights and the Reignbow Pony Tail plugs they made and I got really excited. FINALLY beautiful flowing pony tails in pretty colours! They come in 4 colours with very MLP-inspired names – Cupcake Queen (baby pink), Periwinkle Princess (pastel blue), Sunny Sovereign (bright yellow) and Violet Virgin (soft lavender). These toys are incredibly refreshing for anyone who just wasn’t excited about a straight black haired pony tail.

They’re modeled by porn performer Tasha Reign and friends in a porn that’s been, I think, mislabeled as a My Little Pony porn parody when really it’s more of a Beauty series pony play  thing with a My Little Pony flavour (I’ll be reviewing this next week during my porn parody series “Think of the Children” so stay tuned).  They do have cutie marks though…

Yes, I’ve thought about this a lot.

Anyway, one of the things everyone agrees on is that these plugs are adorable. I can definitively say they are not only comfortable, but incredibly sexy! The plug is made in the same style as Crystal Delights other plugs, like the Minx tail I’ve reviewed before, or their delightful bunny tail.

And it just looks cute, with the tail having a bounce that’s perfect for any wannabe pony. I mean, look at it!

The tail is made with wig hair, and therefore can be taken care of like any plastic wig. There’s care instructions that come with the plug so you can keep it looking beautiful and brand new.

The plug, meanwhile, is made out of clear glass, and you can get them either regular clear glass… or, for a bit more, you can get dichroic glass, which looks like it has multiple colours at once depending on the angle. Mine is the regular glass, and it’s amaaaazing.

It’s about 2.8″ insertable length, and 1.3″ around, making it an excellent starting plug for anyone who’s wanted to try anal play. The glass starts off a bit cool to the touch, which I found pleasant but your mileage might vary. If you prefer to have your toy warmed, you can use warm water to heat the glass… or cold water for a totally different sensation! Just make sure that you’re inserting the toy or removing it using the plug itself and not the tail, or you might pull some of the hairs out and make it look less pretty.

I haven’t done much in the way of anal play for a couple of years. I find it hugely erotic in porn but it’s made me a bit nervous doing it with partners after a couple of less than fun experiences. But this plug was completely worth it, wasn’t intimidating and was incredibly fun!

My partner and I took it slowly, using some water soluble lube for easy cleanup (we really like this one). I found that using a hitachi while engaging in anal play made it a lot sexier for me, because I was able to relax. I was so relaxed, in fact, that when I came I ended up ejaculating like a faucet! I don’t normally squirt without my g-spot being stimulated so I think that speaks to the fabulousness of this anal toy.

I will say that when I tried to stand up to take photos, I found the plug hard to keep in, probably due to all the lube. While lying down the bulb to stem ratio was enough to keep it in, but I think it felt a bit heavier in part because of the tail. If you plan to wear this while engaging in pony play, I recommend a bit of practice to make sure it doesn’t pop out!

At some point I plan to do a photo shoot with this and my matching wig, along with my ears and horn. I love the Reignbow plug and will definitely be using it again.

Thank you Crystal Delights for sending me this plug in exchange for a honest and fair review!

08 Mar 09:40

Savages in Suits

by Maggie McNeill

This essay first appeared in Cliterati on February 2nd; I have modified it slightly to fit the format of this blog.

unfrozen caveman lawyerI find it fascinating (albeit in a sad and terrifying sort of way) to see how oblivious modern Westerners are to the fact that our “leaders” are nothing but tribal chieftains who hide their naked barbarism behind fine talk, fancy titles, ersatz philosophy and elaborate rituals.  The “rule of law” is absolutely meaningless when society supports a parasitic class whose only function is to make more laws, to interpret them in such a way as to inexorably increase their own power, and to hire thugs in order to inflict violence upon those whom they can (credibly or otherwise) accuse of having violated any of the tens of thousands of arcane, abstruse, vague, overbroad and complex laws to which they add new (and invariably worse) specimens every week.  And despite their modern “scientific” or “democratic” veneer, the vast bulk of those laws are based in superstitious concepts which any primitive would recognize:

…that plant matter or technological devices can be intrinsically evil; that certain words or images can be literally harmful to children or even to grown men and women; that the mere action of taking a photograph of a naked person (or in some cases, even a clothed child) is intrinsically inimical; that certain forms of human interaction can mystically harm the participants even if they freely choose to engage in the activity and suffer no physical damage; that magical vestments or talismans can grant power over other people or absolve the wearer of moral culpability for his actions; that official pronouncements from anointed leaders can make things vanish; and even that being given a spell-scroll of one variety can make a “dangerous” action into a beneficial one, while being given a different kind of rune-inscribed parchment can make an innocuous action evil…

The most astonishing part of all this is that Westerners can often recognize these principles for what they are when they are displayed by the “leaders” of a non-Western culture, while remaining willfully blind to the exact same behavior in our own.  Take, for example, this recent news item:  “A 20-year-old woman has been raped in public by as many as 12 men on the orders of tribal elders in a village in eastern India…as a punishment for an ‘unauthorised’ relationship with a man from another village…”  The rest of the article tries to fit this in with other gang rapes in recent years, but that’s nonsense; the latter are the actions of criminals, while this was the action of a group deputized by officially-recognized leaders.  The only reason the rapists and the officials were arrested is that a higher level of government disagreed with their actions.  But while comfortable middle-class Guardian readers tut-tut about how awful “those people” are, people in the UK, Europe and the US are harassed and punished by our own “village elders” for “unauthorized” relationships all the time.  Sex workers and our clients are humiliated in public, confined, assessed fines that are nothing but legalized robbery, and even punished by rape:

new Justice Department study shows that allegations of sex abuse in [American] prisons and jails are increasing — with correctional officers responsible for half of it  — but prosecution is still extremely rare…a growing proportion of the allegations have been dismissed by prison officials as “unfounded” or “unsubstantiated”…even in the rare cases where…[officials admit] sexual abuse occurred…fewer than half were referred for prosecution, and only 1 percent ultimately got convicted…

And as in India, the only time these officially-sanctioned rapists get in trouble is when a higher level of government decides (for whatever reason) to do something about it:

A Justice Department investigation accuses Alabama officials of…fostering an environment of rampant sexual abuse at the state’s Tutwiler Prison, where inmates “universally fear for their safety” and officers allegedly forced women to engage in sex acts just to obtain basic sanitary supplies…male officers openly watched women shower or use the toilet, staff helped organize a “strip show,” prisoners received a constant barrage of sexually offensive language, and prisoners who reported improper conduct were punished…“Officials have been on notice for over eighteen years of the risks to women prisoners and, for over eighteen years, have chosen to ignore them”…

Knight Fighting Woodwoses by Lucas Cranach the Younger (c 1550)We are all, every last one of us, intellectually indistinguishable from our ancestors who migrated to the far corners of the world over the past 30,000 years; the only thing which makes us different is the body of wisdom and learning we have accumulated over that time.  Basically, we don’t act like savages because we are taught from an early age not to.  But when society gives certain individuals – our “leaders” – explicit or implicit permission to ignore the constraints it places upon everyone else, we should not be terribly surprised when they take advantage of the offer.


08 Mar 09:36

Out-FOX-ing FOX News

by Zandar
The Perpetual Right-Wing Outrage Machine has to always be running, and FOX News has apparently become too mainstream for some.  The fringe wants in on the billions, and that means a new cable network with maximum wingnut, headed by Newsmax's Chris Ruddy.

Newsmax, which had revenue of $104 million in 2013, up from $85 million the year before, is perhaps best known for its namesake, 200,000-circulation monthly magazine. A conservative reimagining of the traditional newsweekly, Newsmaxpublishes political stories such as “President Obama’s Outrageous Power Grab” and ads for gold coins and hearing aids. For conservative politicians, making aNewsmax cover is an important stamp of validation. Newsmax.com, launched in 1998, before the magazine, is the most trafficked conservative site on the Web, with more than 11.5 million visitors in January, according to ComScore (SCOR). On a recent morning, the featured posts on the home page were “Obama Intel Reforms Threaten US Security,” “GOP Poised to Retake Senate as Disillusioned Democrats Depart,” and “Bomb-Strapped Islamists Threaten ‘Present’ at Olympics.” Ruddy has amassed a 5 million-person e-mail list, one reason Republican presidential candidates stop in to see him.

What’s remarkable about Ruddy’s prominence in the Republican media establishment is that he isn’t even a Republican, and Newsmax isn’t a conventional media company. Ruddy has taken Newsmax’s boomer audience, average age 54.7, and figured out how to sell it far more than political news. Newsmax, the corporation, is a smorgasbord of political, health, and financial information, self-help books, and even vitamin supplements constantly pushed through the website and e-mail lists. This eclectic array of products—the company made $46 million in subscription revenue from its 17 newsletters and $6 million from vitamin supplements in 2013—makes Newsmax less of a news business and more of a strange hybrid of the Heritage Foundation and Amway. It was Amway founder Richard Devos who suggested to Ruddy that Newsmax could sell supplements to his middle-aged audience.

Here's the kicker:

Ruddy is registered as an Independent and is more moderate than the rhetoric typically espoused by his media properties. He has become friends with Bill and Hillary Clinton and won’t rule out supporting Hillary for president in 2016. All of which makes his latest ambition, to build a TV network that he believes will challenge the conservative news monopoly of Fox News, either a misguided fantasy or a cunningly disruptive business plan.

If you ever needed proof that politics is 100% about the money, Chris Ruddy is it.

And this guy is going to make a mint.

This June, Ruddy plans to launch NewsmaxTV, a 24-hour cable news channel that will be, he says, a kinder, gentler Fox. “Our goal is to be a little more boomer-oriented, more information-based rather than being vituperative and polarizing,” he says. Ruddy says he can make NewsmaxTV profitable entirely through advertising and selling Newsmax’s consumer products over the air. It’s the same business model that’s been successful for QVC, Home Shopping Network (HSNI), and numerous televangelists, but no one has tried it in cable news. He’s quick to add that he doesn’t need to beat Fox News, he just needs to shave off a little of its audience—particularly those conservatives who feel Fox has drifted too far to the right. “If we take 10 to 15 percent of the Fox audience,” he says, “and they are making $1 billion a year, then we are going to be hugely profitable.”

Yep.  And the suckers of the far left and far right will flock to these guys.
08 Mar 09:28

Friday Fuckitude – Military Rape Victims Fucked Again By the Senate

by syrbal-labrys

bMilbrD20130508_lowWell, the Senate just won’t disempower military commanders’ privilege to overturn convictions in their units.  Any crime punishable by more than one year of prison can be appealed to a commander, who may overturn the decision of military judges.  Nowhere has this been more divisive and devastating than in military sexual assault cases.

Sexual assault has never been such a problem as it has in this last pair of wars.  When in countries where women are generally unavailable, such as Iraq and Afghanistan, it seems there are many who think their military companions are fair game — generally the female ones, but not only the women.  This does not mean native women have not been raped… and murder of the victim AND family was one infamous result.

But for now, the effort to stop (mostly male) commanders from vacating convictions sometimes on little more than “boys will be boys; the ‘girls’ knew that when they joined up’ is still in force.  This, in spite of the sexual victimization routine going as high as general grade officers coercing female subordinates for sex and threatening them with death!  The officers in CHARGE of cutting sexual abuse in both the Air Force and the Army have actually been guilty OF sexual misconduct!

Pity hat-pins can’t come back into fashion for the military berets, ladies.  I imagine some inflated egos AND other things could be suitably punctured.


Filed under: Politics, PTSD Journals, War & No Peace, War on Women Tagged: asshattery, military life, military rape, patriarchy, politics, UCMJ
08 Mar 09:26

Plagiarist Paul Ryan is back to crush the poor and starve children

by Grung_e_Gene
Ah, P90X Ryan, the poster boy of everything wrong with the Republican Party is back to his Lyin' Ways.

While Representative Paul Ryan has been anointed the Republican Budget Whiz... because... just because... he's also still one of the young up and comers in the Party, even with that Big Loser Donut hung around his neck from the 2012 Presidential election.

If Ryan had managed to weasel his way into the White House the Romney/Ryan Plan would have raised taxes on millions of Americans and transferred the burden of supporting the government onto the backs of the middle class and poor.  From the Tax Policy Center Urban Institute and Brookings Institution August 1, 2012 Report
However, on average, after-tax income for taxpayers earning less than $200,000 would need to decrease by 1.2 percent, an effective tax increase of $500 per household.
95% of Americans, everyone who earned $200,000 or less, would have seen their taxes go up 1.2% under the Romney/Ryan Plan, but those Americans earning $1,000,000 or more (like R-Money himself) would have enjoyed an average tax break of $87,117.

But, what about the Top 0.1%? Ah! Those "earning" more than $3,000,000 in income would have seen $725,000 transferred to them from the increased tax dollars taken from the poor.

Thankfully, America was spared the a Romney/Ryan Presidency which would have accelerated the Plutocracy's Goals of eliminating the Middle Class and shackling the working class with the chains of Wage Slavery and Corporate Bondage.

But, election defeats does not mean Republicans give up the goals of their Moneyed Masters or the conservative principles of Oppression, Intolerance and Adulation of the Rich.

During CPAC 2014, that right-wing parade of mean-spirited charlatans, wild-eyed lunatics, and shifty grifters Paul Ryan let the audience know his party would be the Party of Ideas. But, turns out Paul Ryan, like all Republicans, is an intellectual property thief and the Chief Republican Idea appears to be thievery. Excerpts from Ryan's Speech;

"Take Obamacare", the estate of Henny Youngman the King of the One-Liners called for his check, please.

"What they're offering people is a full stomach and an empty soul."

This line was stolen from the Star Trek: The Next Generation episode Chain of Command II, a very famous episode because of the prescient way it anticipated the Bush/Cheney Regime ideas and use of Torture.

In the scene, Captain Jean-Luc Picard is being held as a terrorist by the Cardassians who have been  torturing him for military intelligence but, also for sadistic pleasure. Picard has been broken physically, but is still fighting his chief antagonist Gul Madred, the two debate on whether Militarization was good or bad for the Cardassian people,
Gul Madred: What do you know of Cardassian history? 
Picard:I know you were a peaceful people that you had a rich spiritual life --- 
Madred: And what did peace and spirituality get us? People starved by the millions. Bodies went unburied, disease was rampant. The suffering unimaginable... 
Picard: Since the military took over hundreds of thousands more have died --- 
Madred: BUT, we are feeding the people. We acquired territory during the wars. we developed new resources... we initiated a rebuilding program... we have mandated agricultural programs. That is what the military has done for Cardassia. Because of that my daughter will never have to worry about going hungry.
Picard: Her belly may be full, but her spirit will be empty.
But, the biggest theft happened to be Ryan's anecdotal story of Brown Bag Lunch Boy. 

"This reminds me of I story I heard from Eloise Anderson. She once met a young boy from a very poor family, and every day at school, he would get a free lunch from a government program. He told Eloise he didn’t want a free lunch. He wanted his own lunch, one in a brown-paper bag just like the other kids. He wanted one, he said, because he knew a kid with a brown-paper bag had someone who cared for him. This is what the left does not understand."

Well, it turns out this "story" was stolen from Laurie Schroff's book An Invisible Thread, and apparently originated from a television interview with Maurice Mazcyk, a young homeless boy featured in book.

Meanwhile, while Ryan is pushing the Republican Goal of eliminating assistance for hungry children  it's fine for Ryan to be swilling $700 worth of free Pinot Noir while on a romantic dinner date with Hedge Fund Manager Clifford S. Asness because Ryan is one of the elected.

Every one of these anecdotal stories Republicans find which conveniently conform to their bigoted, intolerant, oppressive worldview always fall apart under the slightest investigation. It's a conservative axiom; If the evidence doesn't exist, Then just make it up.

So, we understand you and the Republican Party, Paul Ryan. You want the working class to work themselves to death. You hate when the Government does anything to aid the poor, the oppressed, the downtrodden. How stupid of Obamacare to offer Americans the chance to stay at home and raise their children or taking time from work to care for a loved one or elderly parent instead of working themselves to exhaustion for bare bones medical care.

So, we understand you Paul Ryan. The Republicans have nothing to offer 99% of Americans. Their ideas and goals are to further enrich the 1%, cement income inequality, and shackle the working class with the chains of unbreakable Corporate Bondage.
07 Mar 03:35

In Which Andrew Sullivan Joins My Cause

by driftglass

Mr. Sullivan has shrewdly chosen to jump on my "Jesus Spoon-Playing Christ, who keeps putting these assholes on teevee?" bandwagon, so good on him for that. His particular target: Senator John McCain:
A simple question: why does anyone still take [McCain] even faintly seriously? Why does David Gregory defer to him? Why does CNN have him on to discuss foreign affairs when he as demonstrated catastrophic judgment time and time again? McCain was on the Sunday morning shows 24 times in 2013 – far more than countless other Washington figures with far better records. The year before, he was invited on 21 times.
One of the many, many difference between Mr. Sullivan and myself is that, as a genuine, America-hating, cut-and-running Liberal Fifth Columnist, I spent the Bush Years like most Liberals spent the Bush Years: completely exiled from decent company and shunned and mocked by my own country's media. Nobody wanted to hear what a Liberal had to say. About anything. Ever. Which, come to think of it, was also pretty much the case during the Clinton Administration. And the Bush I Administration. And the Reagan Administration. 

Mr. Sullivan, on the other hand, cheerfully dwelt among the monsters.
Vice President Cheney's legacy
Former Vice President Dick Cheney opened up to Dr. Sanjay Gupta about his battle with heart disease. It started a new conversation about his legacy. Andrew Sullivan, who once considered himself a friend and supporter of Vice President Cheney explains why he now calls him a "man who made some of the worst decisions in American history."
He supped with them. Palled around with them. And helped them do their very dirty work.
“The son of one of Rumsfeld’s closest friends was a friend of mine,” Sullivan says. “We met in a gay bar. That’s how I came to have dinner with Rummy and stay at his house in Taos. He liked to rag me about the blog: ‘You’ve done this for years and made no money. When will you make money?’ And we fought about gays in the military. But when it came to war in Iraq, I was more bellicose than he was.”
Another very big difference between between Mr. Sullivan and the pariah Liberals he use to excoriate for fun and profit (and now mostly just pretends never existed at all) is that, while Liberals were (and are, and, presumably, will always remain) firmly parked in Beltway media Coventry, from his ringside seat as Conservatism's very own gay Vladimir Pozner, Mr. Sullivan was able to amass a very impressive media CV:
Sullivan started his blog, "The Daily Dish," in 2000. His articles have appeared in The New Republic, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The Washington Post and Esquire. He is a regular guest on "The Chris Matthews Show," "Charlie Rose," "Anderson Cooper 360°," "Meet The Press," "Face the Nation," Nightline," "NPR's Fresh Air" and "Larry King Live."
So my simple question for Mr. Sullivan is this: if you sincerely want to know why David Gregory, CNN, et al continue to fete and fawn over thoroughly discredited failures like John McCain...why on Earth aren't you on the phone with your colleagues right now, asking them that very question?  

Calling and asking them over and over again until you either get an answer or a flat refusal?

After which you could -- who knows! -- post what they had to say (or did not say) on your blog?

You know -- journalism.
driftglass
07 Mar 03:33

Mama Don’t ‘Low No Dreamers Round Here

by Bette Noir

image

Meet Rep. Diane Black (R-TN) who is livin’ the dream.  According to Black’s congressional bio she has risen from humble beginnings:

. . . the middle daughter of working-class, Great Depression era parents, Diane saw firsthand their efforts to create a better life for their children through their pursuit of the American Dream.

Diane was the first member of her family to graduate from college degree when she earned a nursing degree from Anne Arundel Community College in Maryland, in 1971.  She then married a doctor, David Black, who went on to build a drug-testing empire known as Aegis Services.

Diane Black worked as a nurse for a while, then decided to try her hand at legislating because . . . YOLO!  Mrs. Black got herself elected to the Tennessee House and served for 6 years, then became a state senator in 2004.

In 2010, Mrs. Black caught the TEA Party wave and surfed into Congress where she insists on being addressed as Congressman and just happens to be one of the wealthiest members of Congress.

How’s that for a success story?  Why, I’d go so far as to say that Diane Black personifies what the American Dream is all about.

Unfortunately, despite the nurturing career and the bootstrapping bio, Diane Black is one of those Ugly American Dreamers whose story concludes with a hearty “I got mine! while pulling the ladder up behind her.”

You see, for almost the entire time that Diane Black has been a US congressman, she has been obsessively battling to end the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) position of public advocate which she calls “an illegal alien lobbyist.”

In case you, like me, have never heard of this obscure little office within ICE, here’s their brief:

The public advocate position was announced two years ago in an attempt to improve relationships between ICE and immigrant communities, and to provide a specific point person for problems with immigration enforcement and detention. And Democrats say there are plenty of problems, including sexual abuse in detention centers, children split from parents and deportation proceedings on people who could be given deferred action under Obama policies.

Rep. Black sees this function as unnecessarily lavishing taxpayer dollars on undeserving “illegals.”  The Congressman thought she had slain this dragon by attaching a rider to a Homeland Security appropriations bill that eliminated funding for the position.  Unfortunately, that rider wasn’t written very well and the administration simply retained the employees, changed the name of the department and continued to advocate on behalf of ICE detainees.

Well, that really steamed Congressman Black’s dumplings so she is fighting back against the “rampant lawlessness” of the Obama administration with a more carefully worded piece of legislation that will ice the ICE public advocate for ever and ever. Amen!

As Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) said in opposition to Black’s bill:

There’s no question that if this bill became law and the Office of Custody Programs and Community Outreach was eliminated, U.S. citizens as well as immigrants and immigrant communities would suffer.  There would be one less check in the system to prevent rape or sexual assault. There would be one less check in the system to ensure that children are cared for even when their parents are taken into custody, and one less check to prevent American citizens from being unjustly detained and removed.

Nevertheless the House Judiciary Committee just gave it their blessing.  Now it’s on to the floor of the Do-Nothing Congress which is almost surely going to wake up and roll over for this one.

Meanwhile, for those of you pesky sceptics who are scratching their heads and asking “is immigration really that hot an issue in Tennessee?”  The answer is—yes and no.

Some of you might remember, last August, when a Tennessee sheriff name of Jimmy “J.J.” Jones was so outraged that the federal government wouldn’t train his local police deputies to get in on immigration enforcement that he threatened:

If need be, I will stack these violators like cordwood in the Knox County Jail until the appropriate federal agency responds.

A little hyperbolic, that, since we are talking Tennessee which is probably several logs shy of a cord in the undocumented immigrants department.  [The Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) estimates there are 120,000 “illegal immigrants” in Tennessee, so there are probably considerably fewer.]

Then there’s the time that state representative Curry Todd got himself into a hot mess when he engaged in this official exchange:

Todd asked a panel of prenatal health care officials if patients have to show proof of citizenship before getting state-funded help.

The official replied that unborn children automatically become American citizens after birth.
“There’s a technical guidance letter that states that, for covering the unborn child, we are not permitted to determine citizenship because the child, once born, is a U.S. citizen,” an official told him.

Todd then remarked: “They can go out there like rats and multiply, then.”

Todd followed up with this non-apology:

I am not going to try and be politically correct with everything I say.  If I offended them I am sorry. But the truth is the truth. A spade is a spade.

In this case, perception is everything, though.  Whether or not Tennessee has a big immigration problem or not, 60% of registered voters—Republicans and Democrats—there believe that they do and people like Diane Black can make political hay with the issue.  That number jumps to 75% for TEA Party members who are Diane Black’s base.

Speaking of which, Diane Black’s most recent statements on her new bill to root out public advocacy in ICE casts her in the rather comic role of Republican politician citing a federal labor leader to support her claims that the public advocate office is a waste of tax dollars.

On several occasions, including testimony given to the House Judiciary Committee, Black has quoted Chris Crane, president of the National ICE Council (an ICE Employees Union) as having said that the public advocate position is “nothing but waste, fraud, and abuse.”

That seemed like a peculiar enough statement, coming from an employee union representative, that I decided to take a closer look at Mr. Crane . . .

As it happens, Chris Crane is dead-set against immigration reform on the grounds that reform would endanger the safety of ICE agents because reform would constitute “special protections and legalization for violent criminals and gang members illegally in the United States.”

Given that Mr Crane seems to categorize immigrants as violent criminals, I was not terribly surprised to learn that:

In the last two years he has become an active player in the nativist movement, and has been particularly busy recently. In April, he attended FAIR’s annual conference, Hold Their Feet to the Fire. In May he used flawed data to back up his opposition to any reform proposal. In August, Crane spoke at a sparsely attended rally in Virginia, meant to kick off a “Stop Amnesty Tour.” The event was hosted by NumbersUSA, the Tea Party Patriots and the Eagle Forum.

In the previous year Crane used his position to obstruct the implementation of new immigration enforcement practices. He actively opposed agency-wide trainings on prosecutorial discretion. He was the lead plaintiff in a failed lawsuit designed to block an executive order on Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), which gives eligible undocumented youth temporary relief from deportation proceedings.

ICE officials frequently dispute Mr. Crane’s statements.  Crane is in a minority in the immigration agency. Nearly 9,000 investigating agents in ICE are represented by a different organization, the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, and they do not agree with his approach.

When asked about her constituents priorities, Congressman Black had to admit that she had not received any actual constituent complaints about the ICE public advocate rather, she said she took an interest in the program because it struck her as an improper use of public money.

Well damn!  If that’s your mission, Rep. Black, I’d say there’s bigger fish to fry, here.  For instance, maybe next time you won’t vote for a government shutdown that costs the taxpayers $24 billion dollars?

05 Mar 21:53

Time Constraints

by Library Vixen

I was on a time constraint, but I did not want to leave without one more orgasm to top off this orgasm filled weekend.

With you still in the other room I decide it best I get started without you.

From the bed the iPad within reach brings you to me, well as close as can be. The clip of you on your knees, there on the floor stroking that thick branch to cum, was exactly what I wanted. Your cock looks bigger than I remember, darker with the tip red and glossy from precum. My mind instantly goes there, I’m on the hardwood floor beneath you, watching like the eager cock slut I can be. Stroking and pulling so close to me, rubbing and sliding that hard meat against my face, lips, and open greedy mouth make me cum hungry. My mouth falls open quite naturally in want of a cock to fill it, to slide across my lips,  for you to spurt right on to my wagging tongue.

Intently watching the way  you caress and swoop under your balls with your fingers, looking at you getting thicker and darker. Sliding a finger between, I open myself just a little. It’s been a nice weekend of fucking and playing, and being wet and sloppy, so it is no surprise now that I am already creamy and cummy. I have sufficiently given myself foreplay! Right as you were a shooting on iPad screen, my cock came from the other room in to help finish me off.

Visions of the two of you encompass my brain, one on each side of me, servicing my needy pussy, while rubbing your cocks all over me. Watching the two of you grip and slide your hands around your trunks, the thought of being able to stroke you and him both is the fantasy playing in my mind, and is definitely making me want cum. In my fiction I have two cocks, in my reality I have one, and with a tease and twitch his sweet hardness finds my lips.

“Is this what you want, you need this cock in your mouth, you need two cocks in you face.”

Oh, you know just what to say. My mind flips and I am so wanting to swallow every bit of you. Hovering above me, you feed me your now very hard cock, my tongue licking and the entire length and back, my arms and hands feeling your strong thighs as you slide in and out past my lips. My own meaty cunt being is being massaged by your palm, making me even more of hungry cock slut. My mind is deep in the fantasy of the two of you hovering over me, one hard shaft in my hand, and your cock sliding in and out of mouth. The two of you have your hands all over me, filling me, finger fucking me, fucking me with any toy at hand.

tumblr_lpmxmiAFtm1qaao3vo1_500

Your fingers are replaced by the rabbit shaped Lelo, which works both the g and clit together.  My puffy pussy lips surround the little vibrating nub, the pressure and the massaging from your hand around the vibe makes me want to fuck. Bucking around the large portion of the toy that is deep in me, I squeeze and pull  it in tightly locking my muscles around the shaft of the toy while the strong vibe pulses my clit sending the familiar electric sparks to my brain. The urge to cum consumes me.

The more I want to cum, the more I want your cock in my mouth, on me, close to me, in my face. I want to taste the precum that continues to drip. I want you both. I want both cocks sliding in and out of my mouth. My feet are on fire, my the lights in my brain are turning black, the smell of your cock is heavy. I want to cum. I slip into my fiction one last time, thinking about you kneeling and coming, splattering me with that delicious clear prefluid that splashes out prior to the heavier white cum that fills my mouth up. My cunt clinches and my orgasm is nice an hard, my ass raises off the bed, my pussy  reaching closer to your mouth so I can pour my own girl cum on to your lips. When I do cum, it is solid with your face between my legs and your cock in my mouth, thinking about you watching us, watching me cum, watching his cock in my mouth adn anticipating the splatter of cum that is about to be released.

 

05 Mar 21:53

Ashes, Ashes — On A Rant-o-Ramic Wednesday

by syrbal-labrys

1attempting to give a fuckI’m  not Catholic.  But it is Ash Wednesday, so I am thinking about things that make me feel like my mouth is full OF ashes.  And yes, of some things about which I simply cannot afford to give a fuck about.

Right off the bat, I really don’t give a fuck who did what at the Oscars, or what celebrity did something stupid this year, ok?  I don’t really give a fuck about various ‘fandoms’ either because I am eyebrow deep in reality.

I also, somewhat heartlessly, don’t really give a fuck what Hamid Karzai thinks about how the war has gone for his country.  He is pissing at Obama; he should have not listened the the MadCowboy, maybe?  Yes, he has seen over 13,000 of his forces die and more civilians.  Hey — welcome to war; did you all forget the Russians, already?  Did you really think signing up with Bush & Co. was going to be sweetness and light?

I don’t really give a fuck if the UN thinks my state is wrong to legalize pot.  Because in the scope of things?  Whether someone gets high means less to me than whether some asshat somewhere can sell his daughter to pay debts or fuck his child-bride to death, so UN?  When you address REAL shit like that? Then you can come bitch at my state legalizing marijuana; till then?  Fuck off…I’m sure Amsterdam gives a similar lack of fuck on your opinion.

I am just about fucking sick of environmentally correct sorts telling me I am the “problem” for “living in the suburbs“, too.  It was NOT suburban when I moved here, but rural.  I couldn’t AFFORD to live in your vaunted goddamned cities, thank you….in 1987 when we bought this house (a wreck in need of work and with NO landscaping —hell, not even soil on the lot) for $70,000, a place in any city that was NOT in a drug-gang-infested neighborhood was TWICE that price.  We couldn’t afford it.  And later, as the suburbs grew into our rural?  We couldn’t afford to move, and now, facing retirement, still cannot.  So, Bite Me, Grist —it is frankly too late to tell Tacoma, Washington to “plan their city”.  I intend to waste not one more fuck OR minute being judged by the likes of you!  The 20/20 hind-sighters can kiss my hindquarters.

I also don’t give a fuck about bloggers asking me if I am “eating ethically” because restaurant servers and bus-boys are paid shit.  I eat out rarely and NO, there is NO PLACE in the state where a living wage is paid to food services folks, thanks.  Are you oh-so-fucking-ethical sorts telling me it’s more ethical to never eat out at all so restaurants close down and there is NO job?  Here in Washington, hardly anyone at any entry level job gets a livable wage. (Even STATE jobs pay $12 or less per hour.  That doesn’t pay rent, groceries,  health insurance (required now) transportation and gods’ forbid anything like child support at all.)  So telling me not to eat out is scarcely a solution for folks whose only money comes from minimum wage pay and the 20% or more tip that I leave.

I don’t care about other bloggers telling me to shop with glass mason jars so I don’t make trash.  Seriously?KissIt  Are you fucking kidding?  The scales at the registers don’t subtract the jar; I’d be paying double for the bulk foods I use to SAVE myself some bucks so I can cover ALL the needs of my family.  And that is if the grocery store even LET me put food in my own jars.  Also,  do you know how MUCH food in how MANY jars we would be talking about?  Do you know how heavy and breakable that bag of jars would be? I recycle, garden, go as green as I can afford, and do my best, but get real.  Shit like that is what makes people on the Right think that all of us to the Left are a bunch of fucking idiots and nutjobs.  An awful lot of folks are MUCH more invested in getting ENOUGH food to the home table, instead of being properly “organic”, cage-free or packaging free about it.  So that self righteous fanaticism about carrying bags of Mason jars into the grocery stores?  You go right on feeling oh-so-eco-edgy proper, ok; but as for telling ME to do the same or feel guilty?  Shove it where the sun doesn’t shine!

I DO give a fuck about a lot of the human misery I see in the world…in Africa, in the Ukraine, in Venezuela.  But I don’t really give a fuck about signing too many petitions and that is because the people in those countries don’t give fuck about reading petitions.  They are very much the “power comes from the end of a gun” sorts, you see?  And that is the OTHER thing I give a fuck about — not sending more Americans every-fucking-where to try solving problems with guns because that is never the real solution.  And also, because just like on airplanes when the oxygen masks come down?  Get yourself out of anoxia FIRST — and America, if you think we are not in “that” trouble yet?  Stop watching Fox News, ok?

guns _ womenAfter all, IF guns were a real solution, America would have NO problems, because we have a fucking lot of guns and all we have to show for it is a lot of dead people who died too young.  But no, guns are COOL — just like dead bodies.  The real problem is obviously women not having enough babies to prove that every sperm is sacred right?

I give a fuck about things propelling my country off a cliff.   I give a fuck about corporate thugs making money exporting jobs and politicians and preachers making money by keeping the desperate workers from strangling all of them with their own guts.

I give a fuck about people being “branded” in ways that allow them to be increasingly marginalized.  But there doesn’t seem to be much I can do about it.  For instance, DSHS doesn’t care if a man is disabled and thus cannot do his former job to pay child support.  And if he, or I, cry foul — some feminist will climb up our asses for asking about men’s rights — by the way, many of those are HUMAN rights — thank you very much.   I’ve had the bizarre experience of arguing for men’s rights to fairness under law and been called names, and simultaneously told I was a bad feminist for NOT supporting Moslem women wearing veils.  Because, right, a religious rule they accept that keeps women in subjection is ok; but asking for legal rights for ALL is wrong?  So, no, I don’t rightly give a fuck about feminists who have become ideologues who cannot even consider listening to people talking about human rights for BOTH men and women.

Ok, that last bit was a lie.  I do give a fuck.  1dont judgeThat is precisely what I give.  A fuck-them.  Because if it was wrong for the male half of the species to fuck over the female half for the last five or six thousand years; why is it suddenly ok for the female half to return that ‘favor’ for as long as they can get away with it?  So, sure, by now you readers, especially feminists, are saying “Well, she is just melting down, isn’t she?”

Well, yes, I fucking well am.  Because when the once “rebel” becomes the very thing that was rebelled against?  There is a problem. And because I am one of the fortunate ones in my society — not  rich, but keeping heads above water and wolves from our door.  Thus far, anyhow.  And yet, I see both men and women all around me sinking — regardless of gender, sexual orientation, political affiliation, religion, or race.  And when you call for a referee, you get a bureaucratic “Fuck off!” from virtually everyone; there is no help.  All there is now in America is valuation by MONEY.

So, the saying now cannot be “Do you feel lucky?”  Everything is for sale, nothing is free by dint of being American — not even privacy.  The question now is, “Do you feel rich enough?”  And for 99% of us, the answer is NO.  The one percent?  They need more, because eventually, they will need to be able to outrun, outfly the reach of the increasingly dispossessed, so their answer is “Hell, no!” and they will keep taking more and more money out of the system that is supposedly there for everyone.

So yes, like the nursery rhyme, sooner or later, we are all going to fall down…..in ashes of the American Dream.  I can taste the ashes already.


Filed under: Life, Media Morons, Politics, Religious Nuts & Bolts, War & No Peace, War on Women Tagged: death, environmental-wtf, guns, mass shootings
05 Mar 21:48

About the Human Hymen (Disambiguation)

by Emma Bolden

When my gynecologist told me that he had broken my hymen, I was focused very intently on ice. This was because I was chewing ice. I was in the recovery room of the Women’s Medical Center and trying not to think about my body, which would mean thinking about the pain inside of my body, so I kept chewing ice and thinking about ice. It was the perfect kind of ice, frozen not into cubes but into ovals the size and shape of pinky fingernails. When I bit down, I felt a strangely electric but nonetheless perfect jolt. The ice was packed densely into a paper cup and covered with Diet Coke, which the nurses said would help with my nausea. It did not help with my nausea. I held the cup with its Diet Coke and perfect pinky-nail ice up at the level of my chin and I kept falling asleep, just like that, with the cup raised up just like that, an ice cube between my teeth. And because I had all of that ice to think about, it was difficult to understand what my gynecologist was saying about what he had just done inside of my body.

I did understand the general idea of what had just happened inside of my body. I knew that my gynecologist had used several sharp instruments, guided by a camera, to cut into, inflate, and explore my lower abdomen. I knew this because he had explained the process after a pelvic examination and Pap smear, during which he wore latex gloves and told me that I would feel a little pressure. I felt a lot of pressure. He looked up at the ceiling and the fluorescent lights that decorated it. His eyebrows pushed against each other and I felt very cold and afraid and so I looked up at the ceiling and its lights, too. After the exam was over, he told me in his whisper-voice to get dressed and meet him in his office along with my mother, who had to be present during my appointments because I was a minor. His nurse smiled and blinked her eyes a few times, then reminded me in her own whisper-voice that his office was the first room on the left. And then I was standing in the middle of the exam room, alone, in a paper gown and with no panties on. I was just standing, in a moment of impossible quiet, until panic keened in my ears.

 ***

The Mayo Clinic’s website recommends that women receive a pelvic examination and Pap smear when they meet one or both of the following criteria: a.) when they are twenty-one years old, and/or b.) when they have been sexually active for three years. Because I experienced extreme pain and bleeding during my menstrual cycle, I received my first pelvic examination and Pap smear when I was twelve years old. I had not been sexually active. At the time of the pelvic examination and Pap smear that left me just standing, in a moment of impossible quiet, I was seventeen years old. I had not been sexually active, though I had received many pelvic examinations, which, according to the Mayo Clinic’s experts, did not make me any less of a virgin.

***

In the center of my gynecologist’s office sat a huge oak desk, like a giant freighter anchored on the navy blue carpet. Both he and my mother looked at me with expectant and worried faces. There were stands set up on his desktop for drawings of women who stood to the front and then to the side, their skin peeled off to show the amorphous pink shapes inside them. I was grateful for my clothes.

“Well,” my gynecologist said, “there’s an area behind your uterus called the cul-de-sac.”

“The cul-de-sac?” I asked. “Like the circle down the street that everyone turns their cars around in?” My mother dipped her head to the side a little and said “Emily” in her own whisper-voice, the one with the italics, which meant that this was not a time for joking. And so I stopped joking. My gynecologist pointed his pen towards one of the side-facing women. Inside of her body were three elongated pink ovals stacked on top of each other.

“This is the uterus,” he said and pointed, “and this is the rectum. And here”—he moved his pen back and forth—“is the cul-de-sac, right in between them. See?” I leaned forward and nodded to let him know I had seen. I was afraid to speak out loud. I was afraid to say yes. “I felt several spots of endometriosis there,” he said, “which explains a lot of the problems you are having.” My foot tapped itself against the floor, so my mother put her hand on my knee. Her hand was warm and I realized that I still felt very cold.

Endometriosis, my gynecologist explained, was a condition in which uterine tissue grew outside of the uterus, like very aggressive and insistent weeds. He couldn’t explain why this happened, or what caused it to happen, or what would make it stop happening. No one could. No one knew. He couldn’t explain why no one knew. He could explain that this could possibly explain why my last period had lasted almost an entire year, and the pass-out pain, and the blood and the blood and the blood. It meant I would probably have a difficult time getting pregnant. It meant that sex would probably be very painful. “Do you understand what I mean?” he asked. I nodded. I had not even had my first kiss. I was afraid to say yes.

***

In the recovery room, I kept chewing ice as my gynecologist listed all of the places he had found endometriosis—in the cul-de-sac, as he’d predicted, and under my right ovary, and on my right ovary, and inside my right ovary—during which I heard mostly crunch crunch crunch. I was getting into a rhythm with it, a strange little song of sorts, when he told me that he had broken my hymen. I kept chewing. He told me not to worry, that he had sewn my hymen up again. I stopped chewing. The hand holding up my cup of ice fell and my mother grabbed the cup before it fell, too. “Whoopsie,” she said.

“What?” I said, my voice thick with drugs and cold.

“I repaired it,” my gynecologist said. He was smiling broadly. “I sewed it up, so don’t worry.”

“What do you mean, you sewed it up?”

“Just that,” he said. “I repaired it.”

“I didn’t even think that was possible?” My voice made an up-turn at the end, so it became a question. My gynecologist nodded in assent. He smiled even more broadly. He looked so proud of himself. I didn’t want to disappoint him. He moved on to talk about how and when and where I could shower. I was still holding my hand in a C-shape right below my chin, so my mother put the cup of ice back in my hand. I nodded my thanks and started chewing ice again, so I could at least hear something that made some sense.

***

In ancient Greece, Hymen was a male, though not a male human being. He was a male god, whose duties included attending every wedding ceremony, so he was very busy. In sculptures and paintings and other artistic representations, he’s shown wearing a garland of flowers and carrying a torch.

The Wikipedia page for Hymen (god) offers a link to Hymen (disambiguation) and a photograph of George Rennie’s sculpture entitled “Cupid Rekindling the Torch of Hymen.” In Rennie’s sculpture, Hymen indeed wears a garland of flowers, along with a penis, which indicates that he is a.) a male and b.) a male who is comfortable with his sexuality. He also indeed carries a torch, though it doesn’t look like a torch. It looks like a vibrator. It looks so much like a vibrator that upon seeing the photograph of the sculpture, I said out loud to myself and my cats, “Is that a vibrator?”

Neither myself nor my cats answered.

***

Approximately four months after my first operation, I sat in my gynecologist’s office, again, looking at his giant freighter of an oak desk while my foot tapped itself against the navy blue carpet. My mother sat beside me. She did not put her hand on my knee to make my foot stop tapping itself. Instead, she was asking my gynecologist why all of this pain I had never seemed to stop. She was no longer using her whisper-voice. My gynecologist explained that my endometriosis had grown back. He used the word “aggressive.” Neither he nor any other doctor could explain exactly why my endometriosis had grown back, and aggressively. Neither he nor any other doctor knew why anyone’s endometriosis grew back, and aggressively. This is because neither he nor any other doctor knew why anyone’s endometriosis grew in the first place.

My gynecologist said it was time for more aggressive measures. It was time for more aggressive surgery. It was time for more aggressive hormone treatments after surgery. Endometriosis, he and other doctors theorized, grew and aggressively because of estrogen. Likewise, they theorized, it would stop growing and aggressively if estrogen levels were lower. After my next surgery, I was to start receiving shots that prevented my body from producing estrogen. I would at that point enter a medically-induced menopausal state. “Do you understand?” my gynecologist asked. I nodded. He handed me a pamphlet about the drug’s side effects. He handed me another pamphlet about menopausal symptoms. I had just turned eighteen. In a few weeks, I would be a freshman in college. I would pack my Birkenstocks, my love bead necklaces, my cat’s eye ring, my favorite sweaters, my Tori Amos poster, my hormone injections, my hormone pills, my pain pills, and an ice pack for when the hot flashes got too bad.

***

After my first three months of college, I came home for Thanksgiving and another doctor’s appointment. My endometriosis had grown back, again, and aggressively. I was no longer a minor and because we both already knew what we would all say, my mother stayed in the waiting room while I sat in my gynecologist’s office, my head bobbing on the waves of the pain medication I had to take to walk.

My college friends all seemed to spend a great deal of their time doing three things: 1.) talking about how badly they needed to get laid, 2.) getting laid, and 3.) talking about how badly they needed to get laid again. I didn’t spend any of my time doing any of those three things, and because all of the pamphlets about my hormones’ side effects and menopause said I should discuss a decreased sex drive with my doctor, I decided to discuss my absent sex drive with my doctor. I said, “I’m just a little worried because I don’t want to have sex.” My gynecologist said, “Do you mean that you’re not sexually attracted to men?” I said, “No, I mean that I’m not sexually attracted to anyone.” My gynecologist said, “Hm.” It was the kind of “hm” that indicated that he did not believe that I didn’t mean that I wasn’t sexually attracted to men, which therefore indicated that he believed I was sexually attracted to women and was ashamed of it.

***

sexualbehaviorAccording to Alfred Kinsey’s Sexual Behavior in the Human Female, 28% of females reported that they experienced sexual attraction to other females. Nineteen percent had engaged in some kind of sexual contact with other females. Most of these women had engaged in some kind of sexual contact with other females ten or less times. I engaged in sexual contact with another female zero times, unless you count very awkward kissing during two very awkward games of spin-the-bottle in my Resident Advisor’s dorm room.

Alfred Kinsey’s report makes no mention of games of spin-the-bottle, awkward or otherwise.

***

My college friends often used baseball metaphors to describe their sexual activities. These metaphors ranged from a strikeout, which involved no sexual activity, to a home run, which involved actual sexual intercourse. Because I was not familiar with either baseball or sexual activity, I often felt very confused when my friends discussed their sexual activities by referring to the bases, to strikeouts, and to home runs.

***

After a while my gynecologist was either a.) convinced that I did not, in fact, mean that I was attracted to women instead of men or b.) convinced that if I was attracted to women instead of men, I was not going to tell him about it, even if my mother was not present. And so he said, “Think about it this way,” and I said, “Okay.” I prepared to think about it this way. I wanted to be a good patient. “Imagine you are drowning,” my doctor said, and so I began to imagine that I was drowning. This wasn’t very difficult for me to imagine because I actually had, at age four, almost drowned. I was actually just remembering drowning instead of imagining drowning. My doctor kept talking: “as you drown, your systems go, one by one, according to what the body needs most. Your digestion stops, your breathing stops, and then your heart stops, and your brain stops last, because that’s what your body needs most.” I imagined my digestion and my breathing stopping, one by one, until I was just a heart and a brain, and then just a brain. “Right now,” my doctor said, “you are drowning.” I didn’t argue. “What does your body need least? Sex. So your sex drive has shut down.” So I had never actually stopped drowning. I’d been walking around all of this time, drowning, and no one who is drowning is also thinking, Perhaps this is the right time for me to engage in sexual intercourse. It made a lot of sense, so I said, “That makes a lot of sense.”

What I did not say to my doctor was that actual drowning was a lot better than the metaphorical drowning I had experienced, all of this time, walking around. Actual drowning was actually kind of pleasant. Everything was soft and blue, even the light, and I felt very peaceful.

***

Wikipedia notes that even if a drowning person tries to hold her breath, her body will try to breathe, despite herself, as a reflex. When I was a drowning person, I did not hold my breath. I also did not note that my body tried to breathe, despite myself. In fact, I noted that I didn’t feel like I needed to breathe, which was a relief. While metaphorically drowning—which is what I had been doing, apparently, and all of this time—I always needed to breathe, which was very unpleasant, because even breathing hurt. So I walked around in my Birkenstocks and ordered egg sandwiches and talked about The History of the Peloponnesian War and drowned metaphorically. Sometimes I stopped and reminded myself to breathe. Then I would breathe in shallow, rhythmic melodies. Sometimes I wished that my breathing would do its own thing and just stop, by its own volition. Sometimes I wanted nothing more than to have my own breathing just stop. When I actually drowned, things were much nicer. I just hung there, in the water, which was very warm, feeling very warm and relaxed and like I didn’t even have to breathe. It was that easy, drowning. It was that easy.

***

In The History of the Peloponnesian War, Thucydides never explicitly mentions the gods or any god’s—including Hymen’s—involvement in human affairs. By his explicit not-mentioning, he is making an explicit point. Instead of using human beings to meet their needs, in Thucydides, the gods exist because human beings use them to meet their needs.

There is no evidence to suggest that Hymen did or did not attend any wedding attended by Thucydides.

***

When I almost drowned, it was in my aunt’s above-ground pool. For a while, I floated around on the surface with the help of an inflatable inner tube. Then the inflatable inner tube stopped helping me, and then I wasn’t floating around on the surface anymore. I was inside of the water instead. I didn’t know how to swim, so I didn’t. I just hung there, with myself and the light and time and everything, everything suspended.

***

drowningaWikipedia notes that there are two kinds of drowning: active drowning and passive drowning. Passive drowning involves “people who suddenly sink or have sunk due to a change in their circumstances.” An example would be the circumstances occurring when an inflatable inner tube no longer helps a person float. Active drowning involves “people such as non-swimmers and the exhausted or hypothermic at the surface, who are unable to hold their mouth above water and are suffocating due to lack of air,” such as a person who has not yet learned how to swim when her/his inflatable inner tube refuses to help her/him float and leaves her/him, instead, hanging in the water with everything, everything suspended.

I could not then, nor can I now, identify which type of drowning I metaphorically walked around in, all that time.

***

In Chapter IX of Book Three of The History of the Peloponnesian War, Thucydides focuses on the sentinels who missed the initial approach of the Plataeans. The sentinels “did not see them in the darkness, or hear them, as the wind drowned with its roar the noise of their approach.” This sentence could also, and accurately, describe why, while I was walking around in my metaphorical drowning, I was not sexually attracted to any of the male or female human beings around me.

***

According to Wikipedia, the tendency to discuss human sexual activity with baseball metaphors first emerged after the Second World War, which ended in 1945. In 1948, Alfred Kinsey published Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, which discussed the human male’s sexual activities from strikeouts to home runs. There is no discussion of baseball, as a sport or as a metaphor for human sexual activities, in The History of the Peloponnesian War.

***

I wasn’t positive that Alfred Kinsey never mentioned games of spin-the-bottle, awkward or otherwise, so I Googled “Alfred Kinsey spin-the-bottle,” only without the quotation marks. Five out of the first six results regarded Wicked Blaze: WWW.Girl-Gear, a novel by Alison Kent published by Harlequin Blaze, which is an imprint specializing in books geared to female human beings who like to read about other females engaging in sexual intercourse with male human beings.

***

In the year that I turned eighteen, I had a total of three laparoscopic surgeries for the express purpose of seeking out and removing growths of endometrial tissue in my abdomen. Prior to the first and second laparoscopic surgeries, I had not yet had my first kiss. Prior to the first, second, and third laparoscopic surgeries, I had not engaged in sexual intercourse of any kind, so even though I had had many Pap smears and very many pelvic exams, according to the Mayo Clinic, I was still a virgin. During the first and second laparoscopic surgery, my surgeon tore my hymen membrane, which he then repaired with small sutures in a procedure known as a hymenorrhaphy. Prior to neither procedure did I give my express consent or express a wish that, should my hymen be torn, it should be sewn back up.

The Mayo Clinic’s experts, unlike my college friends, do not classify virginity as a disease, condition, illness, or syndrome.

***

Many male and female human beings assume that if a female human being’s hymen is not intact, that female human being is no longer a virgin. According to Wikipedia, many heterosexual human beings consider themselves virgins until they have engaged in sexual intercourse that involves penile-vaginal penetration; in other words, many heterosexual human beings consider themselves virgins until they have made it through all of the bases and achieved a home run. The act of sliding into home presumably pierces the hymen membrane, which causes minimal pain and bleeding. However, Wikipedia notes that only 43% of women experience this minimal bleeding the first time that they engage in sexual intercourse, which indicates that their hymen membranes were not intact before they engaged in sexual intercourse. The hymen membrane may not have been present in the female human being’s body from birth; it may have been broken in the act of physical exercise, such as a softball or baseball game. Wikipedia offers no information on baseball metaphors that describe a home run that doesn’t result in bleeding, though “a stolen base” would work nicely.

When my twice-repaired hymen did break, it was not in the process of penile-vaginal penetration, or a home run, but instead on second base. I was twenty-four years old. The pain and bleeding was not minimal, either, but extreme and also humiliating, and therefore play stopped before any other bases were reached. In baseball terms, this experience was roughly equivalent to a force out.

***

Of the hymen, Alfred Kinsey wrote: “I think any creator who claims that he had a purpose in creating the hymen certainly shows himself incapable of having done a good job.” Not only did my hymen not break in the process of penile-vaginal penetration, but the associated pain and bleeding were so extreme and also humiliating that I did not get any closer to penile-vaginal penetration for quite some time. It is unclear if this proves or disproves Kinsey’s remark about any creator’s purpose in creating the hymen, or my gynecologist’s purpose in twice-repairing my hymen.

***

Despite Wikipedia’s insistence, there is no way to disambiguate the hymen.

***

I never told my gynecologist that I was angry with him for performing two hymenorrhaphies without my express consent. I also never told him that I blamed the two hymenorrhaphies, and therefore him, for the extreme and embarrassing pain and bleeding I experienced when my hymen broke. I wanted to be a good patient. I was angry, though. I was angry as I washed the blood off my legs, my arms, my hands. I was angry as I pulled the bloody sheets off of my bed and when I saw the blood seeped into the mattress. I was angry as I folded them before I put them in a trash bag. I was angry as I pulled the pillow out of the bloody-hand-printed pillowcase. I was angry as I saw bloody handprints on the pillow, too, and I was angry as I put both the pillow and the pillowcase into the trash bag. I was angry as I walked to the dumpster, as I clenched my teeth and said don’t cry don’t cry to myself in my head, as I held my nose and slid the metal door open and put the trash bag in the dumpster, as I walked back, as clenching my teeth stopped working, as I started crying, still saying to myself in my head don’t cry don’t cry. I was angry as I drove to Target and as I stood in the check-out line with a cart full of new sheets, a new pillow, Clorox bleach, overnight Kotex, and a bottle of red wine. I was angry. I was angry.

***

Featured image and third image credit

Related Posts:

05 Mar 01:36

ozziescribbler: daniellemertina: sancty: I just had a very...



ozziescribbler:

daniellemertina:

sancty:

I just had a very odd chat on omegle, I put my interest as “feminism”. Here’s one section I found slightly disturbing. It went on for a while, maybe I’ll add the whole chat to a “Read More” post.
I mean he’s actually trying to compare MURDER AND RAPE to “killing a man’s heart”. 

I’d laugh if this wasn’t so terrifying.

I’m scared.

What’s also frightening about this is that he’s not even saying that “men get raped and murdered because of the friendzone”, he’s saying “men rape and murder women because of the friendzone”.  He says “the friendzone is as bad to men as being raped and murdered is to women” And the other person goes “how so?”  And they respond with “Women can get raped and murdered by men who have been friendzoned.”

So let’s see.  According to this guy: men rape and kill women.  Women friendzone men.  Men rape and kill women more.

Yes.  What a deadly and powerful weapon women have to threaten men with.

I also love how he uses male violence against women as proof of how badly men are hurt.  So many rapists and abusers have this justification used to defend them.  They would NEVER abuse or rape if their victim didn’t MAKE them, if their victim didn’t ANGER them, if their victim didn’t LEAD THEM ON. -_-  That they did such a horrible thing is PROOF that their victim did an even more horrible thing to them!

05 Mar 01:35

Folk Talk: Dear Author

by Shelagh Power-Chopra
04 Mar 23:48

Windstreams

by syrbal-labrys

1living in povertyBullshit is blowing in the wind again.  What?  Oh, yes, Obama wants new fuel standards for America so there will be less pollution to afflict tender-lunged sorts like me.  Well, there is something SO effective it blows my liberal skirts RIGHT up, eh?  Right.  Not.  Here is the thing, though, Barry — I live on the West Coast, kind of the left-upper-edge actually.  And we get pollution from China here — some would say that is poetic justice, since it comes from their manufacture of products made there instead of here.  You know, across the ocean where American jobs went? So your fuel standards for pollution do not impress — we are adrift in windstreams of worse content than what makes me cough.

We are sinking into a haze made of much more than smog…and my family is one of the lucky ones; my husband’s income is keeping our heads above the muck.  I know other families still supporting grown children — not even veterans, and raising grandchildren on shrinking incomes.  And we are told the pay cannot be raised or there will be fewer jobs.  Because, sure, American corporations have learned to extract the work of four people from EACH worker.  So, pay at the top soars and pay at the bottom reduces the average worker to serfdom.

Gas is expensive here, and wages are low (though higher than much of the country — but our prices are VERY high, too).  My disabled veteran son gave up the only job he found since college — a state job, too.  It paid less than $12 per hour and his commute was 40 minutes ONE way.  And there is no public transport he could use.  The only bus service within six miles of my home was discontinued last year.  So high gas prices it is, and good thing we had a car to let him use, cause he can’t afford one.  By the time he paid child support and a portion for the arrears created by no job and his disability taking out the jobs he used to do, and health insurance (supposedly a shared expense — but they won’t tell us if the mother is  paying half, so he paid a FULL amount)for his daughter he hasn’t seen since 2006 (because of interference from her drunken mother, which the state will NOT investigate because she is the custodial parent and thus above suspicion), he had about $300 left to live on for a pay period.  If he was lucky.  That covered his gas to drive to work, but not car insurance.  And finally, the stress of the job and a repetitive strain injury ended his hope of getting to move up to something better — for a whole $1 more per hour, wheehah!  He was working and further injuring himself for a wage that he couldn’t live on at all.

Nor would he have been able to even buy his own groceries, much less pay rent. Does it do any good to say that to anyone, like the folks who take child support off the top and don’t apparently care if HE can afford to live and eat?  No.  Do they care that he wouldn’t have a place to live if we couldn’t maintain him?  No.  Do they care that his daughter, whom he can’t see, lives with a family of drunks and a possible pedophile grandfather?  No.  Because he is non-custodial and a “dead beat” he has nothing to say about it.  He is presumed to be a liar because he is  POOR and male.  

He is told if he disagrees with the custody agreement or amount, to hire a lawyer.  Right, did they miss the part about POOR, jobless, disabled?  He is not allowed to know if his ex-wife works, what money she makes, where she and his daughter live — because even though he is required to report all his income and any address change to DSHS, we don’t even know if our grand-daughter is in the state.  Mind you, she allegedly has to report to my son if she moves from the state — but there is NO enforcement of this.  Not without hiring a lawyer and dragging her to court.  Last time that was done?  She didn’t show up at all.  And there was no penalty for that for her.  Is it any wonder so many men think this is what “feminism” has done — gutted them because of the presumption that ONLY women/mothers merit protection.

Nice way to treat a disabled  veteran with a college degree, eh?  My oh-so-liberal state has branded him; he can’t go abroad to search for work because he won’t be granted a passport because he is in arrears in child support DUE TO BEING DISABLED IN SERVICE OF HIS COUNTRY; and if he doesn’t find a few bucks to throw at them monthly even though unemployed, they will take his driver’s license, too.  He is the child of mine who did everything “right” and “by the book” and this is his reward?  We can feed and house him, but I cannot afford to pay over $500 a month for his one child — mothered by a woman who had been in college for TEN years the last time I saw her.

Yeah, thanks for “fuel standards” to help us breathe, Mr. President.  Never mind that half the young educated class of Americans — veterans for whom everyone waves magnetic yellow ribbons — can’t afford to eat, or live.  But the VA has checked the boxes “education” and “pain pills” — so surely that is sufficient, right?  The American Dream is blowing in the wind, Mr. President…blowing the fuck away on rhetoric and box-checking bureaucracy that protects only those with money, or an assumed superiority  of “custodial rights” that exempts  them from all suspicion.  Compared to that?  A little Chinese pollution hardly seems worth mentioning, eh?  So, sure improving “fuel standards” does SO very fucking much for us, Mr. President.  But hey….you did have that little talk last week about “absent fathers” right?  Well, hey, now you know why some of them are absent.

Because they are given no right  to be PRESENT!


Filed under: Life, Politics, PTSD Journals, Snark Tagged: bullshit, divorce, ecology, economy, education, jobs, oil, veterans
04 Mar 23:42

The Return Of The Granny Starver

by Zandar
If you have any doubt what GOP control of the Senate would mean in 2015, it would entail the GOP putting Paul Ryan's budget on President Obama's desk and saying "sign it or else".  Robert Costa pulls no punches:

Ryan and his aides are unsparing in how they take the hammer to current federal policies. On page after page, the report casts a critical eye on how the government administers money to the poor and related bureaucracies, using a bevy of academic literature and federal studies as evidence.

Ryan said the crux of the report is the conclusion that federal programs need to be entirely reimagined, with more than tweaks or axed appropriations, and that legislation this year should move toward broader solutions that solve what he thinks are structural weaknesses in how the government supports the poor.

“Because these programs are means-tested — meaning that benefits decline as recipients make more money — poor families face very high implicit marginal tax rates,” the report says. “The federal government effectively discourages them from making more money.”

During the Clinton years Republicans demanded that programs had to be means tested to make sure that Cadillac-driving welfare queens weren't magically buying T-bone steaks on Uncle Sugar's dime and getting rich.

Now in the Obama years, means-testing means the welfare queens are poor and staying poor because it "discourages them from working".  So now "reforming" these programs means scrapping them entirely.

According to the report, Head Start, a federal program for early-childhood education and nutrition, is “failing to prepare children for school,” and “a consolidated, well-funded system would be better.

Medicaid, which provides health coverage to low-income families, is the object of a sharply worded review. “Medicaid coverage has little effect on patients’ health,” the report says, adding that it imposes an “implicit tax on beneficiaries,” “crowds out private insurance” and “increases the likelihood of receiving welfare benefits.”

Head Start and Medicaid have to go.  Time for block grants, which means states can use the money however they want to, and that of course means "not for the poor".

Ryan also huddled with Iain Duncan Smith, a former leader of Britain’s Conservative Party. Smith is well known in the United Kingdom for his attempts to better connect conservatives with the poor.

“We’ve been paying very close attention to the Tories and their think tanks,” Ryan said. “They’ve done a lot of work already, and we can learn from their experience, both their mistakes and their successes, so we can rework our welfare system and get people out of poverty and onto lives of self-sufficiency and dignity.”

Remember, what Republicans mean by "self-sufficiency and dignity" is "working more than 40 hours a week, with no minimum wage, with overtime pay replaced by 'comp time' that your employer never has to actually let you have, for an employer who can fire you for any reason without recourse, for a rent payment that takes up the vast majority of your income."

And if the GOP wins control of the Senate, the Ryan Austerity plan becomes the budget.



03 Mar 22:14

There is no BDSM diploma

by stabbity

Every so often on sites like Fetlife I’ll see people asking how much training/education/direct personal instruction they need before it’s ‘okay’ for them to have a sub of their own. I understand being concerned about being a responsible dom and taking reasonable precautions to avoid harming anyone you might play with or start a d/s relationship with, but I just don’t understand where people get the idea that there’s some sort of standardized dominant certification process.

If you’re going to get involved in something as potentially dangerous as BDSM, you’re going to need some critical thinking skills. Not only is there a lot of terrible advice out there, but there is also plenty of reasonable, well-intentioned advice that simply won’t work for your personality and situation. You’ll save yourself and any partner/s you might have a lot of time if you think things through.

So, let’s work this ‘standard amount of training/instruction before you can be a dom’ thing out. First of all, if there were some sort of rule that you need x years of experience before you’re allowed to have a sub of your own, who on earth would be the one to decide how much experience is necessary? Or  the one to administer the dom test and declare that you’re ready to start looking for a sub?

There is simply no answer to either of those questions that makes any sense. There is no national governing body for kinky people, and given that trying to get us all to agree on anything is like herding cats, there never will be. Your local kink group might have some guidelines that suit you and the way you play, but then again, you might have the sheer bad luck for your style not to mesh well with the general style of most people in your area. For example, my local community is generally very low protocol. Our standard (very broadly speaking) of being ready to play with someone is knowing not to flog the kidneys. If you were interested in high protocol master/slave relationships, that wouldn’t help you very much.

And that’s if your community is run by well-meaning people whose style simply differs from yours. There’s always the possibility that your community is run by assholes who don’t want any competition for the hot young submissives. If someone tells you that you need months of intensive study before you can even think of picking up a paddle while they gleefully pounce on every new person who wanders into the community, they just might have an ulterior motive.

Even  if there were a standard amount of training everyone needed before being set loose to find a sub (which will happen around the time soaring flocks of pigs become a menace to air traffic), there would still be the problem of who provides that training. What if you go to Mistress A and I go to Master B and they disagree about whether punishment is useful in a d/s relationship? What if you start your training in City Q, then move to Town K before you’re ‘finished’?

Aside from the numerous and glaring logistics problems with any sort of standardization, there’s one core problem. Namely, why the fuck should I care how much education some random thinks I ought to have? If you want to be someone’s top/dominant/master, there’s precisely one person whose opinion matters: your prospective bottom/sub/slave. If the two of you are happy and healthy*, everyone else can fuck right off.

*On the subject of healthy relationships, an agreement to have a certain type of relationship does not magically make it healthy for anyone involved. People technically ‘agree’ to work for terrible companies under abusive conditions because making some money is less awful than making none at all, that absolutely does not mean that said terrible job was actually freely chosen. People may also technically ‘agree’ to abusive relationship dynamics (for example: “You can say no to me whenever you like, but that will end our relationship.”) because they are afraid that relationship is the only chance they have to get their kinky needs met. If anyone in the relationship cannot freely say “No” or “Hey, can we talk about this?” at any time with no fear of consequences, something is horribly wrong.

No matter how experienced you are, it couldn’t hurt to read some of the enormous amount of advice available or to find someone in your community who you personally respect and ask them questions, but when it comes to relationships (high risk kinks are a separate issue and you really should get plenty of one-on-one instruction if you’re going to do something that might seriously harm someone) there’s a limited amount other people can tell you that you can’t figure out with good communication skills and a willingness to try things out and see if they work.

Above all, no amount of education is going to keep you safe if you’re unwilling or unable to think for five minutes and sort the maybe useful from the obvious bullshit. If you can’t put on your grownup pants and think things through for yourself, you should probably forget the whole kink thing until you’re ready to run your own life without Mommy and Daddy telling you what to do.

03 Mar 22:13

Sex Worker Rights Day

by Maggie McNeill

A slave is one who waits for someone else to free him.  -  Rosellen Brown

Save Us from SaviorsAsian sex worker activists are my heroes; they are everything I wish American sex worker activists could be.  Here in the US, we let the media run so absolutely wild in spreading the prohibitionists’ poisonous lies that the few of us who do speak up almost seem like proof of the prohibitionist myth that we are “unrepresentative”.  But when they use that same asinine strategy on Asian sex workers, it merely makes them look foolish: consider, for example, Nicholas Kristof’s claim that all 65,000 members of DMSC are “pimps”; it made him look like a clown rather than a savior, and has not exactly entered into the prohibitionist arsenal of slurs as he might have liked.  Read that number again:  sixty-five thousand.  And Durbar is only one of many such organizations in India:  SANGRAM, VAMP and others are so numerous and so influential that if it were not for the vast resources pumped into the country by American prohibitionists I have no doubt they would have achieved decriminalization long ago.  Sex worker organizations in Thailand, Cambodia and South Korea are equally formidable, and like India wouldn’t suffer nearly the level of criminalization and police abuse that they do were it not for the flood of American money and busybodies pouring into them via both governmental and non-governmental channels.  Yet unlike sex workers in the US, they refuse to take this abuse lying down, crawling into the shadows to cry like whipped dogs; on the contrary, they band together to fight all the harder, holding massive demonstrations and press conferences, doing their own studies to counter rescue industry mythmaking, and otherwise acting in their own defense instead of waiting for someone else to “save” them as all too many American sex workers are wont to do.  It’s terribly ironic: the people whom prohibitionists characterize as most in need of “rescue” are actually those least in need of it.

That’s why I am glad to see today, Sex Worker Rights Day, finally beginning to gain the attention it deserves; you see, it is the only one of the “big three” sex worker observances with an Asian origin:

[Sex Worker Rights Day]…originated in India in 2001 as a festival organized by the sex worker rights organization Durbar Mahila Samanwaya Committee, and attended by 25,000 sex workers despite efforts from prohibitionist groups who tried to prevent it by pressuring the government to revoke their permit.  In celebration of their victory over those who wish to criminalize and marginalize sex workers, DMSC proposed it as an annual, international event the following year:  “We felt strongly that that we should have a day what need to be observed by the sex workers community globally…Knowing the usual response of international bodies and views of academicians and intellectuals of the 1st world (many of them consider that sex workers of third world are different from 1st world and can’t take their decision) a call coming from a third world country would be more appropriate at this juncture, we believe.  It will be a great pleasure to us if all of you observe the day in your own countries too…

Though the day caught on fairly rapidly in Asia and Africa, it was still virtually unrecognized in Europe and North America in 2008, and only barely recognized the first time I wrote about it in 2011.  But it’s quickly gained ground since then; by 2012 a number of Westerners were writing about it online, and last year it seemed to get even more attention than Whores’ Day.  As I wrote in my column for the latter occasion, “The sex worker rights movement was born in the West, but it has come of age in the East and South, and it is their example which is most heartening to those of us struggling under the near-constant persecution of our profession in the United States.”  While it’s true that the movement in Australia and New Zealand has succeeded in winning the best conditions for sex workers, those activists didn’t have to contend with the racism, colonialism and blatant interventionism against which Asian sex workers must struggle for every tiny gain; furthermore, they’ve succeeded in moving forward while Europe has been trapped in a dramatic backslide.  That’s why I’m proud to hold them up as an inspiration for Western activists, and to do my small part in promoting a celebration which they created. Sex Workers' Freedom Festival


02 Mar 21:56

Fixing the op-ed page

by djw

In comments on Erik’s Douthat post below, there is some discussion of the staggering and utter vacuity and general uselessness of the non-Krugman* op-ed writers there. Erik promises a post on who, ideally, should be occupying those roles. While I have some ideas myself, I want to instead question the model? Why 6-7 people writing twice a week? The defects of this model seem obvious to me. First, if you take writing with such a platform and built-in audience as seriously as you should, the demands of doing it twice a week would be quite grueling. (Coates explains why he didn’t want the job in such terms here.) This creates two problems. One, even great writers strain to find something worth saying that often. Two, it creates pressure/incentives to focus on whatever the ‘story of the moment’ is, which is often some pointless journalistic obsession about which there is very little of interest to say.

My preferred model would look something like this: a stable of 30-50 regular writers, drawing from academics, journalists, and others who have something to day, but wouldn’t or couldn’t commit to a full time op-ed job. When someone uses the platform to pursue an important story over several columns (say, Herbert on Tulia) bump them up in the rotation accordingly. Lots of rotation in and out of the pool; perhaps an “emeritus” status for people who’ve retired from regular contributions but might have something worth saying once or twice a year.

The benefits seem obvious: less tendencies toward village group-think, more thoughtful contributions, less “story of the week” silliness, more people writing about something they actually know about, etc. Insofar as Nick Kristoff identified an actual problem, it would create a venue for sustained public intellectual work by important scholars who couldn’t or don’t want to commit to the level of commitment Krugman has.

Setting aside the “feature not a bug” reasons some might want to retain the current model, I can’t really conceive of the advantages of the current model over this one.


    






02 Mar 21:54

Shorter Cardinal Ross Douthat

by tengrain
“The gay sinners are oppressing my right to legally hate them, and why the hell are they being so smug about all their victories?” Jeebus. What an assrocket. (NYTimes)Filed under: Homophobia Tagged: Sex Phobic Ross Douthat Professional Scold
02 Mar 21:24

Seven Good Reasons People Don’t Initiate Sex

by Marty Klein, Ph.D.

I’m still in New Zealand, travelling from North Island to South Island by (gorgeous) ferry and (fabulous) train.

And I’m pondering the four days of training I just provided the country’s sex therapists and marriage counselors. As is the case in every country I work in, everyone here wants to know more about desire. Why does it decline in loving couples? How do we enhance it?

One seminar participant brought up the subject of initiating. Indeed, we all have patients who want sex but don’t initiate it. We also have patients who are ambivalent—if their partner initiates they’ll have sex, but if not, they’d just as soon skip it.

So rather than pathologize men or women who don’t initiate sex, I always assume they have good reasons, whether medical, psychological, relational, or some combination of these. Here are some.

* They don’t expect to enjoy it: not initiating sex you don’t expect to enjoy isn’t a pathology, it’s common sense. It’s the same reason I don’t order broccoli in restaurants—I don’t expect to enjoy it.

* They don’t expect their partner to accept: everyone needs to be able to hear the word “no” without collapsing. But when experience (or bitterness or even guilt) predicts that “no” is the likeliest answer, not asking is understandable.

* They anticipate criticism: “Oh, you’re finally initiating?”; “Suggesting sex? I guess you want something from me”; “If you’re inviting me to have sex, it better be more than a quickie”…if this is what someone expects when they initiate, it’s no wonder they don’t.

* They’re tired of initiating: Some people are fine doing virtually all the initiating, as long as the answer is usually “yes.” But some people feel such a pattern is humiliating, and they’d rather break the cycle, even if it means less sex. Or at least that’s what they think when they stop initiating.

* They don’t feel attractive or desired: When people think “sex is for other people” or “my partner would prefer sex with someone else, but settles for me,” that can drain the energy out of any erotic situation—and discourage someone from translating sexual feelings into sexual interest or initiating.

* They experience “foreplay” as a chore or as one-sided: if you don’t enjoy the kissing, hugging, and transition from not-sex to sex, initiating what lies beyond “foreplay” typically seems like a lot of effort for low return.

* They’re waiting to feel incredibly horny: When beginning our sexual careers, desire generally feels overwhelming, unambiguous, irresistible. Ten or twenty years into a relationship, desire typically feels calmer, more rational, more easily directed or postponed. If people in long-term couples are waiting until they feel sexually ravenous, they may wait forever—and never initiate again.

Suggesting sex is an invitation to connect. If connection is not what someone expects or experiences, they’ll be slow to initiate sex—and with good reason. If that applies to you or your situation, some clear communication (accompanied by affection) is definitely in order.


02 Mar 21:23

Noonan Haz A Sad, Channels Ophelia

by Bette Noir

image

Apparently Peggy Noonan took to her fainting couch recently, suffering from a touch of SAD, and found herself scribbling away and projecting her depression on all of America.  I tend to avoid conservative propaganda outlets, such as Fox News and The Wall Street Journal, mainly because of their insalubrious effect on my blood pressure.

But this communique from the inimitable Nooners exploded across my desktop like a multi-car accident and I just had to become a gaper.

She had me by the first sentence, which reads:

The constant mischief of the progressive left is hurting the nation’s morale.

A bold premise but deftly supported by citing those experts on the American psyche—Gallup, of Gallup polls.  Gallup found, in December, that a record number of Americans, 72% to be exact, feel that big government is a bigger threat to the future than big business and big labor.

This probably came as no surprise to the good folks of Gallup because so it has been, every single time that they have asked that question since the first time, in 1965.  Indeed, Noonan, herself, points out that this is a fairly predictable data point.

None of these numbers are new, exactly, as they reflect long-term trends.

So.  One might ask oneself “what exactly is the woman’s point?” 

Well, she tells us in a bit of lavender prose:

But they never lose their power to startle. The persistent blues, the lack of faith, the bet that things won’t get better—it just doesn’t sound like America.

We are suffering in great part from the politicization of everything and the spread of government not in a useful way but a destructive one. Everyone wants to help the poor, the old and the sick; the safety net exists because we want it. But voters and taxpayers feel bullied, burdened and jerked around, which again is not new but feels more intense every day. Common sense and native wit tell them America is losing the most vital part of itself in the continuing shift of power from private to public.

This, of course, is conserva-speak for Obamacare.

Ah, yes.  Here we are:

. . . You can only employ so many before the new insurance rules kick in so don’t employ too many, don’t take a chance! Which means: Don’t grow. It takes the utmost commitment to start a school or improve an existing one because you’ll come up against the unions, which own the politicians.

(see Corker, Sen. Bob)

Things stagger downhill from there in a predictably zig-zag pattern:  “the dark screw-ball comedy that is Obamacare” as a disincentive to work . . . Harry Reid makes an appearance as Lenin . . . the IRS is victimizing “independent groups” and pulling on its jackboots to go out collecting fines from the uninsured.

The NSA, HHS and the EPA—they’re all there, everything but BenGHAZI!!—all those BIG Gubmint boogeymen, that give Peggy Noonan a massive headache and serious sadz for “the way things were” before Obama-nation!! when coal companies could pollute an entire state’s water supply with abandon, unfettered by “. . . Rules, regulations, many of them stupid, from all the agencies—local, state, federal . . .”  and nowhere was heard a discouraging word.

The good old days when our President Led by Lying to us all so that he could send a generation of young Americans to death, and devastating physical and emotional trauma; cripple the economy; tarnish our integrity and standing in the global community and suspend decades old conventions of decency to further a perverse personal agenda.

Some of us are still pretty depressed by that wreckage wrought by Republicans and neo-cons in the first ten years of the new century, Peggy.  And if they’re “exhausted from trying to fight back on a million fronts” and being pelted by screwballs in your fanciful batting cage, I’m for cranking up the pitching machine.

Predictably enough, this lamentation ends up with the age-old cry of playground losers everywhere—Sure you won, but that’s a crappy trophy and it ain’t worth winning—

But the left too is damaged. They look hollowed out and incoherent. Their victories, removed of meaning, are only the triumphs of small aggressions. They win the day but not the era. The result is not progress but more national division, more of a grinding sense of dislike. At first it will be aimed at the progressive left, but in time it will likely be aimed at America itself, or rather America as It Is Now. When the progressive left wins, they will win, year by year, less of a country.

You’re right about one thing, though, Nooners . . .

People feel beset because they are. All these things are pieces of a larger, bullying ineptitude. And people know, they are aware.

And that is why the Right is decomposing before our very eyes. 

 

02 Mar 21:22

Whenever I think guys on OkCupid can’t say anything WTFish...



Whenever I think guys on OkCupid can’t say anything WTFish to me that I haven’t heard before, I learn how wrong I am.

"I’ve dated many women of various ethnic backgrounds but never a trans"

"I’ve dated many women of various ethnic backgrounds but never a trans"

"I’ve dated many women of various ethnic backgrounds but never a trans"

"I’ve dated many women of various ethnic backgrounds but never a trans"

"I’ve dated many women of various ethnic backgrounds but never a trans"

"I’ve dated many women of various ethnic backgrounds but never a trans"

What the fuck?

02 Mar 21:17

The Withdrawal

by Remittance Girl

blackouthauntedhouse-girlFingers, tongue, words, needles, teeth, cock, nails, fists, lips, blades, ideas, images. It’s not the way he penetrates her that disturbs her; it’s the way he withdraws.  Because she knows he yearns to leave with the Polaroid of someone ruined and discarded firmly clutched in his fisted hand. That, she will not allow.

When he leaves, she bathes.

She lies back in the warm water. She smokes. She flings one leg over the edge of the bathtub and examines the pattern of his bite, the abrasions on her knees. She contracts the muscles of her cunt and feels the sting, the emptiness, the formless ache of congress that always leaves in its wake the echoes of the fuck.  The rosy marks of his fingers on her upper arms and hips. The angry contraction of her nipples in the water’s heat.

Sweat beads on her face and runs into the rawness of her lips. The places on her skin, like stretches of dried riverbed or barren ground, where his cum has dried and crackled, are reconstituted in the water to viscous again. Cuts unclot. Bruises bloom. She licks her lips to soothe the salt’s sting and tastes his saliva again. She revisits her small, peculiar triumphs.

Back in the presence of his caustic hunger, wound tight on the creaking pin of civility. The awful tension of that string doesn’t make her reconsider; it’s what draws her. To where he is a man always on the edge of being an animal, that bright and tender place of constant calculation of where the line might be drawn or broken.

There, what has made him doesn’t matter. Nor what conspires in her to call her to that place. She has tasted the sour premonitions of all the things he might render her long, long before she arrived at his doorstep.  Past the post of good judgment, like any good traveler, she becomes a fatalist.

In that no man’s land, he casts her in whatever role gets him hard: as deceiver, as whore, as pitiful victim of his dishonorable machinations, weak-willed, soft-hearted, half-witted fuckdoll or  lovelorn dupe. In that place, she is whatever hinges his jaw, sharpens his teeth, draws out his claws.

For her, he is all the abysses she fears to look into, the monsters she cannot face. Every insult, every humiliation, every loss of agency she believed she could not bear. All the pain she thinks she cannot tolerate.

She can and she does. She endures because it is all she needs to know about herself: that she endures, that she can walk through his fire with her eyes on his, and not lose sight of the fact that they are who and what they are, in spite of what they do to each other.

He may not leave savouring the spectre of her regret.  That is the one fantasy she refuses him.

02 Mar 21:15

Straight And Narrow

by Zandar
NY Times cultural scold Ross Douthat complains that the forces of LGBTQ equality are sore winners and that the veto of Arizona's "religious freedoms" bill really means that we should stop being so awful to the people who see them as sinners who need to be punished.

What makes this response particularly instructive is that such bills have been seen, in the past, as a way for religious conservatives to negotiate surrender — to accept same-sex marriage’s inevitability while carving out protections for dissent. But now, apparently, the official line is that you bigots don’t get to negotiate anymore.

Which has a certain bracing logic. If your only goal is ensuring that support for traditional marriage diminishes as rapidly as possible, applying constant pressure to religious individuals and institutions will probably do the job. Already, my fellow Christians are divided over these issues, and we’ll be more divided the more pressure we face. The conjugal, male-female view of marriage is too theologically rooted to disappear, but its remaining adherents can be marginalized, set against one other, and encouraged to conform.

I am being descriptive here, rather than self-pitying. Christians had plenty of opportunities — thousands of years’ worth — to treat gay people with real charity, and far too often chose intolerance. (And still do, in many instances and places.) So being marginalized, being sued, losing tax-exempt status — this will be uncomfortable, but we should keep perspective and remember our sins, and nobody should call it persecution.

But it’s still important for the winning side to recognize its power. We are not really having an argument about same-sex marriage anymore, and on the evidence of Arizona, we’re not having a negotiation. Instead, all that’s left is the timing of the final victory — and for the defeated to find out what settlement the victors will impose.

Alas and alack!  If only the horribly tyrannic equality forces who will probably win a Supreme Court ruling would give Ross Douthat a way to still legally practice hating those people!

Sure, just like women "won" after Roe v Wade.  How many legal loopholes and blockades can same-sex marriage opponents put on getting married in red states?  Works for abortion clinics, right?
02 Mar 21:13

There’s a black hole in the Perseus galaxy cluster and it’s singing a sad tune in the key of B flat

by Joshuah Bearman

Actually, it’s entire tune is the note B-flat, but 57 octaves lower than middle-C, or one million billion lower than what the human ear can hear. It is “the deepest note ever detected from an object in the Universe.”

6a00d83451afa369e2019b00ab18d9970b-400wi

Related Posts:

  • No related posts…
02 Mar 21:12

Douthat Has The Sadz

by Erik Loomis

Poor Ross. He reads liberals comparing the recent spate of anti-gay bills to segregation and he can’t understand it. After all, he already considered the ability for an individual to discriminate against someone in their place of business conservatives’ “surrender.” Which terrifies one to think about the victory. Anyway, this is just great:

So what then? One possibility is that this division will recede into the cultural background, with marriage joining the long list of topics on which Americans disagree without making a political issue out of it.

In this scenario, religious conservatives would essentially be left to promote their view of wedlock within their own institutions, as a kind of dissenting subculture emphasizing gender differences and procreation, while the wider culture declares that love and commitment are enough to make a marriage.

Right–so the people who declare that love and commitment are enough to make a marriage are the wrong ones. I mean, even if you actually think that, and Douthat may be the only person under the age of 40 in the United States to believe marriage is primarily about procreation, shouldn’t you at least change the phrasing to avoid looking so dismissive of basic respect for one’s partner?

Once again, can we fire all of the Times columnists except Krugman and start over? They range from embarrassing to providing no value over replacement columnist.


    






01 Mar 21:50

Arizona's Gay Jim Crow Law and other States efforts are about using religion to enforce Bigotry

by Grung_e_Gene
"Freedom of religion doesn’t mean freedom from religion." - Rick Perry, current Governor of Texas, 2012 Republican Presidential Primary Candidate and 2016 Presidential Hopeful. 
"I think this administration has a very narrow view of the First Amendment, that first freedom, the freedom of religion. I think they see religious freedom as fine with it as long as it’s in the four walls of a church. But if it comes into workplace, the marketplace, if it comes into the public square, it’s not welcome." Family Research Council Tony Perkins complained in 2013. Of course, this is entirely correct, what you do in your church or home is fine but, forcing your religion onto someone in the public arena is not welcome or lawful.
Homosexuality is an abomination before GOD and man.  The Bible states this in plain English! - (emphasis as in the original) standard comment by a conservative in response to the pushback of right-wing efforts to get Discrimination codified into law as well as, highlighting Tea Party ignorance.
I wasn't going to address the Arizona Gay Jim Crow Law, but after Jan Brewer vetoed the bill the Right-Wing Wurlitzer of Outrage kicked into gear.

Ben Shapiro, the inheritor of Breitbart's Empire of Lies and Bigotry, wrote indecipherable tweets which all culminated in a cry of Fascism.

Racist Limpbaugh blathered something or other about bullying on his odious radio program. Bryan Fischer and other rabid right-wingers complained of the "Homo-Fascism" using the power of government to make the faithful engage in sin. The conservative reaction is predictable because these bills speak to the very core of what it means to be a Conservative.

Judson Phillips, of Tea Party Nation, warned of the incoming tyranny of Penis cakes. But, Judson did hit upon the key issue at play;
The issue can be boiled down to one word: Freedom.
A free man or woman controls their labor. A slave has no control over their labor. A free man or woman decides who they will work for and under what conditions. The slave cannot.
As did Eric Erickson,
In December of 1865, the several American states ratified the 13th amendment, constitutionally ending involuntary servitude in the United States. In the 21st century, Americans are coming full circle. In a number of states, a black man can again be forced by the government to work involuntarily for a white man.
The Arizona SB1062 Law along with the other legislation proposed by rabid Right-Wing Legislatures are fundamental extensions of two core components of conservative ideology; Oppression and Intolerance. While also being tangentially related to the third core component, Adulation of the Rich.

These laws are very much about Freedom. They are designed to give conservatives the freedom to impose their religious beliefs on you, while also granting them the freedom to openly discriminate while operating in the public sphere.

But, they don't want you to know that's what their doing so they couch their bigotry under the guise of religious liberty.

These laws are backed by the same people that want to give business owners the ability to decide what medical care you are allowed to receive and how you spend your earned wages.

Recall they made the same bogus "religious liberty" argument during their evil struggle against the PPACA. So, if a Business Owner doesn't believe in blood transfusions or antibiotics because of his sincere religious beliefs conservatives want to give them the right to deny you that medical coverage. If a Business Owner doesn't consume pork, conservatives want to give them the right to ensure you aren't spending your wages on bacon.

Because conservatives believe in and want a return to Slavery. Republican voters are comprised of Bigots and Billionaires, Misogynists and Millionaires so Corporate Bondage and Oppression brought about by the awesome power of government euphemistically crouched under the guise of religious liberty suits both demographics.

Of course, the only reason Brewer vetoed this law and Republicans in Arizona began to back-track was financial. Apple and several other businesses voiced concerns over doing business in Arizona and the NFL not so discretely implied the 2015 Super Bowl would be moved from Arizona if the law was adopted.

So, Conservatives are inadvertently being honest when they claim this issue is actually about Freedom. Conservatives hate Freedom and what they seek is nothing less than an abolition of Freedom, Democracy and Liberty and an enshrinement of the Ultra-Reactionary Neo-Feudalist Wage Slavery State.
01 Mar 18:45

Friends with Benefits

by earth

Dear Mary Jane,

I’m afraid that this letter is not going to be easy for you to read; but there is a lot of important stuff that I really need to say to you right now, and you know how writing things out helps me to organize my thoughts.

Photo of the Teafaerie

First off (and perhaps most importantly) I want to take the time to remind you of how very much I appreciate you. You were my first love, and I will never forget the magical days of passionate discovery that we shared when we first got together. I was so very smitten with you!

You were the girl that my mother had warned me about. Which, of course, only added to your considerable mystique at the time. And you were always a whole lot of fun to be around, even if you sometimes got me into trouble. You were popular with the cool kids (unlike dorky old me), and when we first hooked up I thought that your casual lawlessness made me look sophisticated. Plus, you already seemed to be acquainted with almost everybody who I wanted to get to know better, and whenever I brought you to a party I always had a fairly easy time making friends.

As we grew closer you became my constant companion. Everything just seemed like so much more fun when we were together! I love going to the movies with you, I love going camping and exploring the great outdoors with you, and I love going out to dinner with you. I even appreciate just sitting quietly at home together. And you know how much I enjoy your company in bed and in the bathtub!

Besides, you’ve always been there for me when I needed you. You help me to relax when I’m too wound up, and you gently soothe my little aches and pains whenever I’m not feeling well. (Remember that time when I was nauseous for DAYS and you were the only one in the world who offered me any solace at all?)

I want you to know that I haven’t forgotten about any of that, and I never will. Furthermore, I want you to know that I really and truly do hope with all of my heart that we will always find some way to remain friends. There are aspects of myself that only you can bring out in me, and I really do want you to be a part of my life!

But… (You knew that there was a butt coming, huh? I really am sorry for dragging this out.) But the reality of the situation is that we’ve been growing apart for a long time now. I’m sure that you know what I’m talking about.

It’s not your fault. I’m the one who has changed, and I totally take full responsibility for that. I’ve recently gotten really busy with a lot of important projects (some of which you admittedly helped to inspire), and I simply don’t have as much free time to hang out with you now as I used to. And I KNOW that you really want to assist me with those projects, too, but trying to work on some of these things with you can turn out to be rather like letting my 4-year-old niece “help” me make cookies, you know? It may be a whole lot of fun, but it doesn’t exactly get the job done any faster.

We’ve both seen this coming for a long time, I think. But it really clicked into focus for me when we spent a couple of months apart recently. I missed you, of course, but I also got a chance to rediscover a few things about myself that I’d almost forgotten about over the years, and I feel that I could really get a lot of benefit out of exploring some of those long-lost elements of my personality at greater depth.

There are also a few things that I’ve been feeling vaguely angry with you about for a long time, but I’ve only recently been able to articulate them. To put it bluntly (and again, I apologize if this seems overly harsh), I’m getting extremely sick and tired of your passive aggressive bullshit! There. I said it. Like for instance the way that you keep ordering pizza and filling the freezer full of ice cream when you know damn good and well that I’m trying to eat more healthy foods.

Why are you always “accidentally” mislaying my car keys? Why do you persistently encourage me to procrastinate whenever you know that I’m on a tight deadline? And the way that you’re always trying to make me feel like I need you in order to medicate my persistent background anxiety feels a little bit codependent around the edges. Anxiety is a natural part of life. And somehow I managed it just fine while I was away from you, now didn’t I?

But even more disturbingly, its been becoming more and more obvious to me that you’ve been subtly sabotaging some of my other important friendships all along. I’m thinking specifically of my childhood friend Morpheus, with whom I got a long-awaited opportunity to reconnect during our recent separation. Truth be told he took me on long, wonderful, exquisitely lucid adventures almost every night while we were apart, and I have to admit that I enjoyed every minute of it! I really had forgotten about how very much I love him. And frankly I found it suspicious how easily I was able to regain access to his realm almost as soon I got far enough away from you. I mean, jealous much? Is that why you always try to make me too lazy to go out and play with my friends? You tried to convince me that I needed you in order to fend off the dreaded Sobriety Sickness, but it turns out that after it settles in for about a week, the natural state actually has a lot to recommend it. But you didn’t want me to find out about that, did you? You always seemed to find some new excuse to drag me back into your clutches, every time I almost managed to get you out of my system for long enough to notice that sobriety itself can actually be a fascinating biochemical state in its own right.

The uncomfortable truth is that you’ve been making me feel kind of nervous lately. It’s nothing that you’ve said or done. It might be a simple matter of my changing metabolism. Or maybe I’m just growing up. But ever since we took that break, simply being around you seems to fill me with a sort of ill-defined contentless anxiety. Maybe it’s just a phase that I’m going through and we’ll be able to work it out and get back together someday when we both have a clearer idea about what it is that we really want out of our relationship.

I hope this doesn’t come across as a goodbye letter. Like I said, you’ve been such an invaluable inspiration to me, and it would break my heart if you and I were to ever lose touch with one another. I just think that it would be beneficial for both of us if we were to spend a little bit more time apart for a while. It’s partly that I want to explore my relationship with Morpheus, of course. But more than that, I guess that I feel compelled to try to find out who I am on my own. We’ve been together for half of my life now, you know? I’ve haven’t really experienced what it’s like to be by myself since I was in college. I guess that it’s just something that I feel like I need to revisit for a while.

I’m so proud of all of your recent accomplishments! I wish you the very best of good fortune in your upcoming legal battles. Hang in there! I really do think that it’s only a matter of time. And good luck with your medical work, too. You’re such an extraordinarily talented healer, and I strongly believe that you’re well on your way to establishing the wider credibility and social acceptance that you so richly deserve.

I hope that you can understand where I’m coming from here, and that you don’t end up taking any of this too personally. I just need a little bit of me time right now. It happens. And like I said, I’m sure that I’ll eventually want to start seeing you again at some point. But I think that it would be much healthier if we were able to eventually work out some kind of an occasional friends-with-benefits arrangement, rather than trying to make a go of it as full time partners.

Oh my sweet, sweet Mary Jane! I’ll never regret the time that we spent together. You’ve played a big part in making me who I am today, and I shall be forever grateful. Thank you for all of the laughs, the lessons, the insights, the fun adventures, the comfort, the inspiration, and most of all for providing me with your unique and fascinating perspective on life.

This isn’t the end, old friend. It’s just another opportunity for transformation.

With kindest regards,

The Teafaerie*

 Taefaerie Says Farewell

01 Mar 18:31

azurewhelp: cuteosphere: it always disappointed me that...







azurewhelp:

cuteosphere:

it always disappointed me that Monster Girls are an anime porn thing rather than something used to explore the way society and the media dehumanises women, but oh well

shout out to all my fellow monsters

this is so good

01 Mar 18:24

Revisit: The 6 Feet Under Club

by kittystryker

So, one of the things I’m going to try to do is highlight some of my older posts which were super popular on my old blog and aren’t getting any notice here. Today? I’m gonna remind you about what it’s like fucking in a coffin (with some edits, because, well, thankfully I’m improving as a writer)

So I joined the 6 Feet Under Club.

I mean, I needed something to distract me, and it was a typical evening in San Francisco, so when asked “hey, would you like to have sex in a coffin” really what other answer will you give other than yes, yes, absolutely.

My self-preservation skills have never been great.

Now, to clarify- the woman who fucked me in that coffin, R, she’s been a friend for a while, and we’ve flirted about as long as we’ve known each other. But we’ve never gotten around to a date- she’s busy, I’m busy, so it just got put off. You know how it is, too much of a good thing, always distracted, FOMO nipping your heels all the way.

Until she asked me if I would join her for this Arse Elektronika experiment exploring private and public space. And how did they want to do this? By creating a coffin for two, with a night vision camera, burying it in a dumpster in SoMa, and recording/projecting the camera’s visuals onto the side of a building, of course. I mean, what better way to explore what privacy means in an internet age?

I wasn’t sure if I’d be in California when this was going on as I was waiting on paperwork to fly to London, so I hesitantly said yes, despite my fear of enclosed spaces. I wanted to challenge myself, and hell, this isn’t even on the purity test, so it must be awesome. Plus, ok, I’ll admit it… I read a lot of Anne Rice and Poppy Z. Brite and this sounded like the sexiest, most terrifying thing ever.

Well, thanks to bureaucracy taking such a long time to process my visa, I was here for it. So I asked her Wednesday if she was still up for it. She was. We made some preliminary plans, I discovered there were slots available, and started freaking out about what one wears to a first date where you’re going to be having sex in a coffin. You know, the usual problem for a Saturday night. I decided on a sheer striped black slip, stockings, and, of course, no panties. For practical purposes. Coffins don’t have a lot of wiggle room, after all.

So I laid all this stuff out, and then spent too long at a friend’s house so rather than the slow, chill time I had planned to get ready and prepare myself, I found myself doing what I often do on Saturdays- grabbing my outfit and running out the door, sadly without any of my femme makeup. Or a vibrator. I did have condoms and lube, though- old habits die hard, I suppose. I decided, fuck it, it’s a night vision camera, would it matter really if I had eyeliner on? Probably not.

I had promised dinner but ended up grabbing some Thai on the run, as opposed to the sit down leisurely dinner I had planned, due to traffic and my own rushing around like crazy. Oops. Still, I got some nice stuff, and she was happy to be fed, as was I. We wandered into PariSoMa right as the last panel discussion was wrapping up, a discussion about making spaces for sex, at parties, within rituals, and on the playa. Fascinating stuff. If you’re into sex and technology and how they interact, I highly recommend checking out this conference, it’s got some great stuff (I’ve spoken there a few times now, and it’s kinda how I got to know Maggie and Ned Mayhem).  The Monochrom kids are completely nuts. Read their blog and poke around their site, it’s like if club kids were geeks… and Austrian.
Anyway, thankfully, despite my forgetfulness, I had picked a fabulous partner for the 6 Feet Under Club. R is well-versed in erotic film, and sex with girls, though not with coffin sex. She had brought a lovely dildo, condoms, two harnesses, vegan lube, and enough gloves to fist an army. This is one of many reasons why I adore her. We ate, and tiptoed to the bathroom- I could see through the window the dumpster filled with dirt and the coffin in the middle, waiting for the first victim/volunteers. It gave me goosebumps, and, well, some wetness between the legs. I’ll admit it- I was scared, and it was hot as hell.

I decided that I needed to have a smoke, but really I wanted to sneak out and investigate the coffin up close. It was satin inside, and cushy, with a comforter doubled up on the bottom and some lovely pillows for under the head. The camera was precariously perched on the ceiling right in the middle of the coffin- meaning, you either got visuals of the head, or the feet. Looking at it in person, 80x30x24 actually seemed kind of roomy, though that camera was going to take some manipulating around.

R and I started to discuss how we might position ourselves when a lady came by and asked if we were going in the coffin. When we replied to the affirmative, she asked for an interview. I said sure, cause, hell, my parents read this blog, and Grandma’s pretty unlikely to watch SF Weekly videos. So she asked me why I was here, was I a necrophiliac, what made me want to do this, was I into Dracula, etc. I did the interview, finding the whole thing wildly entertaining as a hedonist who has a fetish for novelty, and then went back to discussing logistics. One of the gravediggers gave us details about how it worked, that they’d cover the lid with dirt, and then give us a 5 minute warning via banging on the cover of the coffin. It was originally just R and I and another couple, and I felt a little disappointed.

Then, a couple of friends arrive, including one who does fantastic paintings, who reassured me that a friend of hers who was an engineer had done the math and there’d be plenty of air to make it safe. Probably. I was so happy to see people I knew! Both of them were curious but not sure if they could follow through. I, meanwhile, took too long to get changed so had to wait for couple #1 to go first. In retrospect, I’m really glad, because it gave us a feel for what it’d be like, how to position ourselves, and how we wanted to deal with things like gloves and lube.

While couple #1 were getting it on in the coffin, one of their friends says something about how she’s not sure how she feels about watching her friends having sex. Initially, I was like “really? I watch my friends have sex all the time!” but actually being a porn reviewer who knows a good number of the porn stars you see… it can feel a little weird, maybe even invasive. I’ve been known to ask people if it’s ok to watch porn with them in it, just to be sure.

Oh, I forgot to mention the release form. It basically said that being buried alive is, well, dangerous, and not for people who are claustrophobic, afraid of the dark, have breathing issues, heart problems, etc. Amusingly, as it was being read out, the cops drove by, and waved. We waved back. Just another night in San Francisco I suppose, though I doubt they had any idea what we were up to. (note: now, in 2014, I wonder if we’d get away with it)

“Don’t worry,” said Johannes, the Undertaker of the experience, “we have a permit. For the dumpster, anyway”.

R and I happily signed our release forms and started getting ready- I took off my street clothes and slipped on my negligee, removing my panties (practical, remember?) while she strapped on her harness and got the safer sex supplies ready. I was pretty nervous, but way, way too excited to back out. Plus, remember, first date, and first playdate, with this hot woman I had been wanting to sleep with for a while- doing it in a coffin would be a memorable first time, though I’m not sure how I would top it next time around.

Couple #1 came out, safe, happy, and flushed. I gave my coat to one of my friends and asked her to take photos of the night vision projection. They didn’t come out very clearly, and keep in mind, the camera was positioned right in the middle so we had to maneuver around it. And yes, there is a recording of this, and we’ll get it in a couple of days- I’ll post it if I can (I am a show off after all).

The coffin was opened for us now, so I took a deep breath and stepped inside. I was surprised at how comfortable it actually was, though glad to have gotten rid of the satin barrier that was my panties. I settled in, R strapped her cock on while I lubed up my pussy, and we tried a few positions, finally settling with me on the bottom, slightly to one side, and her on top. She’s pretty slender, and I’m fat, so it was a bit of a squeeze but we worked it out! We realized it’d be easier to insert the cock while the coffin was opened, so I put on some latex gloves to guide her cock in, and the door was shut.

It was dark in there. Really dark. And lying there, a cock in my pussy, hearing the dirt being dumped over the lid was incredibly sexy. We started kissing, gingerly at first, then more and more passionately as she started to fuck me. The confined space meant my left leg could only go up so far (I recommended afterwards that they install some rope foot loops to give some leverage), but it was far enough. I was definitely feeling conscious of the camera until her cock started to touch my cunt. With her cock hitting my clit as she slowly, then faster inserted herself, I was in heaven.

Together we freed my breast from my bra and she licked and sucked my nipple as she thrusted. We giggled, and I gasped a lot. It was cramped, so we had to change position a little to make it more comfortable, but it was incredibly erotic. The darkness, the blind reaching for each other, the sounds, the scent. Oh, the scent. A coffin fills up very quickly with the smell of aroused girl, that’s for sure. Soon she was rubbing my clit while I grabbed her harnessed ass, and then her latex gloved hands were fingering me so expertly I would have squirted if I wasn’t so self conscious about the next couple in!

I had been worried about the air, hot air being something that can trigger panic in me. It actually wasn’t so bad, and, as I kind of guessed, being fucked while in that sort of confined space really makes you care less about claustrophobia. Instead I found the warm air to be even more sensual, and the satin against my skin made me tingle. 15 minutes literally flew by in a haze of moaning and building orgasm. “Bite my nipples, please” I begged R, and she did, making me go right to the edge. I came right before they opened the coffin to two panting, shaky women, and we scrambled up to a round of applause. Appropriately, we were told to bury our safer sex supplies in the dirt, so we did, and gratefully took the towels they provided for afterwards. My legs were wobbly, and my head, I think, was a bit out of it, as I tried to put my shoes on before my underwear, then thought better of it. After the sweating and the heat of the coffin, the cold night air in SoMa was rather shocking to the system. I kind of wanted to crawl back in.

We got certificates for joining the 6 Feet Under Club. I’ll probably frame mine (note: I did). I feel really proud that I did it in spite of my fear, and am still completely giddy. There ended up being three queer and three straight(seeming) couples. I even got to watch one female friend initiate another into her first bisexual strap on sex in 25 years, and also saw another friend and her boyfriend get it on. There was a hot gay couple I know from Burning Man as well, which was fabulous. I loved the variety of orientations and types of sex represented. Though, Monochrom, next time you make a sex coffin, let me give you some tips on where to put the camera for a better angle… and, yeah, foot loops. There’s no traction, in a satin-covered coffin, and it’s hard on the fucker to get enough oomph to really get going.

Would I do it again? Most definitely. I’m happy to have done it, and consider myself incredibly lucky to have had such a lovely companion for the experience. Though, as she said, next date, we’re going to go for a place with pillows. And a shower. And, probably, more room.

I wanted to write this while it was still fresh, but it’s 4am now, so I’m signing off. But yes, fucking in a coffin is dead sexy.

(Note: I have not yet gotten to do this again… but absolutely would!)