Beet L. Jooz
Shared posts
How Mueller Team, FBI served up Paul to reporters...
Louisiana gymnastics coach accused again of child sex abuse
Now YouTube plans to pick 'authoritative' news
(Wired) Following a year in which YouTube has repeatedly promoted conspiracy-theory videos during breaking news events like the shootings in Parkland, Florida, and Las Vegas, the company announced on Monday a slew of new features it hopes will make news on the platform more reliable and less susceptible to manipulation. The company is also investing $25 million in grants to news organizations looking to expand their video operations, as part of a larger, $300 million program sponsored by YouTube’s sister company, Google.
According to YouTube executives, the goal is to identify authoritative news sources, bring those videos to the top of users’ feeds, and support quality journalism with tools and funding that will help news organizations more effectively reach their audiences. The challenge is deciding what constitutes authority when the public seems more divided than ever on which news sources to trust—or whether to trust the traditional news industry at all.
Among the many changes YouTube announced Monday are substantive tweaks to the tools it uses to recommend news-related videos. In the coming weeks, YouTube will start to display an information panel above videos about developing stories, which will include a link to an article that Google News deems to be most relevant and authoritative on the subject. The move is meant to help prevent hastily recorded hoax videos from rising to the top of YouTube’s recommendations. And yet, Google News hardly has a spotless record when it comes to promoting authoritative content. Following the 2016 election, the tool surfaced a WordPress blog falsely claiming Donald Trump won the popular vote as one of the top results for the term “final election results.”
Women’s March Releases Pre-written Statement On Trump’s ‘Extreme’ SCOTUS Pick, Forgets to Fill In Name
Fox News Reporter Harassed, Threatened And Forced To Leave Supreme Court By Leftist Mob
Everyone Hates Brett Kavanaugh, Everyone Loves Brett Kavanaugh: Reason Roundup
A dose (or a dozen) of perspective on Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump's new nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court. The 53-year-old D.C. appeals court judge once clerked for retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy—a fact that may have eased Kennedy's fears about retiring (...or maybe not)—and has strengths and weaknesses from a libertarian perspective. Here's what we know (and don't know) so far about Kavanaugh's judicial leanings, along with a healthy side of speculation from folks across the partisan spectrum.
Democratic senators such as Ed Markey of Massachusetts and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut have been throwing all sorts of Kavanaugh alarm around to see what sticks—he's a "right-wing ideologue" (says Markey) who has been "screened and vetted by extreme right-wing groups" (Blumenthal), a puppet of corporations, or the Koch Brothers, or...something. Something bad.
Much of the criticism isn't aimed at Kavanaugh per se but at the allegedly crooked process that got us here. The crux of this strained argument is that Trump considered the recommendations put forth by the Federalist Society, a conservative legal organization (or "a small, secretive network of extremely conservative Catholic activists," if you're feeling hystrionic like The Daily Beast's Jay Michaelson).
.@SenBobCasey said he cannot support a "corrupt" process that has led to the president picking from a list of 25 candidates "funded by the corporate right." https://t.co/JSQw49q6o9 #StopKavanaugh #NoSCOTUSvote
— Democratic Coalition (@TheDemCoalition) July 10, 2018
But there's no shortage of fear—and praise—from the respective sides for Kavanaugh's record on actual constitutional issues, including gun rights, speech issues, and due process.
Brett Kavanaugh is a true Second Amendment radical. He believes assault weapon bans are unconstitutional, a position way out of the judicial mainstream, far to the right of even late Justice Scalia.
— Chris Murphy (@ChrisMurphyCT) July 10, 2018
Kavanaugh is "receptive to cases that challenge gun control laws" and also "sensitive to the constitutional implications of regulations that interfere with freedom of speech," noted Reason's Jacob Sullum last week. But "Kavanaugh seems to take a narrower view of Fourth Amendment rights."
"Many observers have suggested that President Trump will try to replace Justice Kennedy with a jurist 'in the mold' of Antonin Scalia, or perhaps of Scalia's successor, Neil Gorsuch," Reason's Damon Root pointed out over the weekend. But with Kavanaugh, we "may well end up with a jurist in the mold of John Roberts."
Fun fact: A year before SCOTUS decided Citizens United, Trump's Supreme Court pick—Brett Kavanaugh—sided with Emily's List against the @FEC that the pro-choice nonprofit shouldn't be required to pay for election-related activities with "hard money" subject to donation limits. pic.twitter.com/KGFXmY5OlK
— Anna Massoglia (@annalecta) July 10, 2018
The New York Times editorial board frets that "Judge Kavanaugh would shift the balance of constitutional jurisprudence to the right, creating a solid right-wing majority on the court possibly until the second half of the 21st century," and leaving Roberts "as the fulcrum for the court."
But the paper also published a range of perspectives on Trump's pick, including this from liberal Yale Law School professor Akhil Reed Amar:
The nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to be the next Supreme Court justice is President Trump's finest hour, his classiest move. Last week the president promised to select "someone with impeccable credentials, great intellect, unbiased judgment, and deep reverence for the laws and Constitution of the United States." In picking Judge Kavanaugh, he has done just that.
In addition, the Times notes that Kavanaugh "once argued that President Bill Clinton could be impeached for lying to his staff and misleading the public, a broad definition of obstruction of justice that would be damaging if applied to President Trump in the Russia investigation."
Here's what libertarian-leaning types—plus everyone's new favorite socialist—have been saying:
Kavanaugh is not another Gorsuch—not even close. Disappointing pick, particularly with respect to his #4thAmendment record. Future decisions on the constitutionality of government surveillance of Americans will be huge. We can't afford a rubber stamp for the executive branch.
— Justin Amash (@justinamash) July 10, 2018
I look forward to the upcoming hearings, reviewing the record, and meeting personally with Judge Kavanaugh, with an open mind.
— Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) July 10, 2018
Why the Kavanaugh #SCOTUSpick was a conventional yet shrewd political move. My latest @nypost https://t.co/eqMOHzWRwb #CatoSCOTUS
— Ilya Shapiro (@ishapiro) July 10, 2018
The fact that #ScotusPick Kavanuaugh believes that a President cannot be indicted is an automatic disqualification from Supreme Court consideration.
Plain and simple. https://t.co/3h2k2rTYVI
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Ocasio2018) July 10, 2018
FREE MARKETS
D.C. Council may repeal minimum wage for tipped workers. Initiative 77, approved by D.C. voters in June, would raise the minimum wage for waiters, bartenders, and other workers paid partially in tips to $15 per hour by 2026, up from $3.33 currently. But it might not make it into law. WTOP reports:
A bill to repeal the measure is being discussed and could be introduced during a council meeting on Tuesday, according to a spokesperson for D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson.
The measure is expected to be sponsored by at least six council members—including Mendelson—who have publicly denounced the measure.
Opponents believe the measure will force restaurants to raise menu prices, reduce their staff and lead to less take-home pay for servers. Supporters argue that the initiative will reduce worker mistreatment and give them a steady income.
TWEETER-IN-CHIEF
He's been on quite the roll this week...
Thank you to all of my great supporters, really big progress being made. Other countries wanting to fix crazy trade deals. Economy is ROARING. Supreme Court pick getting GREAT REVIEWS. New Poll says Trump, at over 90%, is the most popular Republican in history of the Party. Wow!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 10, 2018
Pfizer & others should be ashamed that they have raised drug prices for no reason. They are merely taking advantage of the poor & others unable to defend themselves, while at the same time giving bargain basement prices to other countries in Europe & elsewhere. We will respond!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 9, 2018
The failing NY Times Fake News story today about breast feeding must be called out. The U.S. strongly supports breast feeding but we don't believe women should be denied access to formula. Many women need this option because of malnutrition and poverty.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 9, 2018
QUICK HITS
- A judge rebuffs the Trump administration's request for permission to detain immigrant children longer.
- Tennesse's "free college" program "is turning out to be a middle-class entitlement."
- Who could have guessed that the head of San Bernadino's "Hardcore Gang Unit" doesn't hold the most racially enlightened views?
- D.C. debates whether cashless businesses should be illegal.
- The World Health Organization now officially recognizes both gaming addiction and sex addiction as diseases.
- In "the largest study of the health of transgender individuals on hormone therapy ever done," researcher found that transgender women taking synthetic hormones have an elevated risk of strokes, heart attacks, and blood clots. The same did not hold true for transgender men.
- Ethiopia and Eritrea have reached an end to two decades of conflict, with leaders of the countries agreeing to a "Joint Declaration of Peace and Friendship" and the renewal of economic and diplomatic ties. On Sunday, direct phone service between the countries resumed. "The pace of normalisation of relations between the two countries has been truly stunning," writes Abraham T Zere at Al Jazeera.
Trump Issues Full Pardons To Oregon Ranchers Forced Back Into Prison Under Anti-Terror Law
Kavanaugh: ‘I Will Always Strive to Preserve the Constitution of the United States’
Brzezinski Calls out Schumer: Isn’t Kavanaugh the Nominee Because Dems Lost?
Schumer: Kavanaugh ‘an Extremist,’ the ‘Most Extreme’ on Trump’s List
Trump Went With A Safe, Strong Choice For SCOTUS. But What A Ride It Was
One of the most suspenseful 10-day periods in American legal history culminated Monday night in Trump naming Judge Brett Kavanaugh as his pick for the Supreme Court. Of course, justices have retired before, and presidents nominated their successors. But for the Supreme Court’s “swing vote” to hang up his robes in a politically fraught time as this, and then for the White House to announce that a successor would be named on particular day at a particular time? That’s gold, Jerry, gold!
We started with the list of 25 eligible jurists that had won Donald Trump the election, assuring conservative elites and a crucial slice of the electorate that whatever crazy deviation from political orthodoxy the man represented, he actually did have the best people working on judicial nominations. (Read Salena Zito and Brad Todd’s remarkable “The Great Revolt” if you doubt that Iowa farmers and Michigan waitresses weren’t paying exceedingly close attention to the fight for Justice Antonin Scalia’s seat.)
In due course, contenders emerged — a short list of appealing personalities that ranged in background about as much as federal judges could. There was the son of Indian immigrants who was born in Toledo and made a name for himself in Kentucky (Amul Thapar); a brilliant law professor and mother of seven from Indiana (Amy Coney Barrett); an introverted Michigan judge who preferred the solitude of his wilderness cabin to the stifling Washington swamp (Ray Kethledge); a Pittsburgher who was the first in his family to graduate college and put himself through law school by driving a taxi (Tom Hardiman); and of course the boyish D.C. insider with the strong opinions on the separation of powers (Brett Kavanaugh), the only Ivy Leaguer in the bunch who seemed to have been preparing for this moment his entire life.
Clerks and other surrogates (the law’s publicists) advocated for their champions in a way I’d never seen before—or at least this was the first time anyone thought they needed to send me their “publicity materials.” The daily deluge of case summaries, legal memoranda, and other lobbying efforts became overwhelming and sometimes annoying. Then came the wave of op-eds praising this or that judge’s originalism, his or her capacity to be a political benefit or to see the law exactly like Justice Scalia, or to be Justice Neil Gorsuch 2.0.
The process finished with a prime-time special that, quite coincidentally I’m sure, ran right after the latest episode of ABC’s “The Bachelor.” The anticipation and Twitter gossip all day leading up to it — was that Barrett at the airport? where was Hardiman pumping gas? — must be how normal people feel about that other reality TV show.
I half expected the final pair to be up there on stage in the East Room, with the president turning to the runner-up and saying, “sorry, pack your robes and go,” before giving the rose gavel to the winner. Poor Hardiman — a wonderful man, and a judge’s judge — was the runner-up for the second consecutive time. Doesn’t that mean that he should get a spin-off show, perhaps getting to pick the next president in a sort of role-reversal?
Kavanaugh, who had only been added to the list in November (as had Barrett), had been the frontrunner all along. He was known to be the favorite of Don McGahn, the White House counsel, and was by far the most connected to the legal elite that, even in Trump’s Washington, hold tremendous sway over these sorts of things.
Indeed, the fact that Judge Kavanaugh wasn’t a consensus first choice shows what a deep bench Republicans have. It was also telling that the worry was never that there would be a David Souter (stealth candidate who moved left) or Anthony Kennedy (squishy moderate), but a John Roberts (conservative but one more committed to minimalism than originalism). There are still some concerns about this latter issue with Kavanaugh, but they’re ones of degree, not kind. That is, the nominee has an exceptionally strong record of enforcing constitutional structure — in the name of liberty! — and protecting both the freedom of political speech and the right to bear arms. It’s just his political caginess and cleverness that worry the cognoscenti who still feel burned by Roberts’s Obamacare betrayal.
In the end, despite the brouhaha and suspenseful plot twists, the president went with what can in this context be called the conventional conservative choice. By playing it straight, Donald Trump still managed to surprise.
Trump sued by former chauffeur...
Woman Fired For Calling Cops On Black Man Wearing Socks In Pool...
Woman Fired For Calling Cops On Black Man Wearing Socks In Pool...
(Second column, 21st story, link)
Mueller Moves to Bar 'Selective Prosecution' Argument...
MCCONNELL: Same Scare Tactics, Same Accusations...
JUSTICE BRETT...
KAVANAUGH: Judges Must Interpret, Not Make Law...
Long DC history gives Senate much to review...
Liberals Furious Over Nomination of [Insert Name Here]...
Pop-Up Protests, Meltdown Erupts...
Celeb Freakout...
FOXNEWS Host Cancels Live Show Over Volatile Protests: I Felt 'Threatened'...
DC DANGER...
KAVANAUGH: Judges Must Interpret, Not Make Law...
ABC Blasts 'Controversial' Nominee -- Before Announced!
President's Court Pick to Cement Conservative Majority...
KAVANAUGH: Judges Must Interpret, Not Make Law...
Long DC history gives Senate much to review...
Pop-Up Protests, Liberal Meltdown Erupts...
Celeb Freakout...
FOXNEWS Host Cancels Live Show Over Volatile Protests: I Felt 'Threatened'...
DC DANGER...
FOXNEWS Host Cancels Live Show Over Volatile Protests: I Felt 'Threatened'...
FOXNEWS Host Cancels Live Show Over Volatile Protests: I Felt 'Threatened'...
(Top headline, 7th story, link)
JUSTICE BRETT...
KAVANAUGH: Judges Must Interpret, Not Make Law...
Long DC history gives Senate much to review...
Liberals Furious Over Nomination of [Insert Name Here]...
Pop-Up Protests, Meltdown Erupts...
Celeb Freakout...
DC DANGER...
Woman Threatens To Shoot Up Newspaper Office For Not Publishing Article...
Woman Threatens To Shoot Up Newspaper Office For Not Publishing Article...
(Third column, 6th story, link)