Note: This post was originally written by Matt Hoffman of our sister program, the Sales Leadership Council. You can read the original here.
It probably does not come as a surprise to readers of this blog that, as a profession, Sales has a slight image problem. As Dan Pink pointed out in To Sell is Human, when people think of “sales,” the first words that comes to mind are ones like “pushy,” “yuck,” “difficult,” or “annoying.”
What’s probably more surprising is the fact that Procurement, the function that Sales is so often pitted against, has an image problem of its own. Consider how these Dilbert cartoons portray Procurement. In one, a new Procurement officer is advised to “Give employees low-cost substitutes and claim the savings on your accomplishments;” in another, a Procurement officer announces a new system that “divides products into two categories: things you don’t want, and things you’re not allowed to buy.” The upshot is clear: people view Procurement as a function that makes it harder, not easier, to do their jobs well.
In the past, Sales and Procurement were able to perform well despite their negative images. Customers had to rely on salespeople to learn about the products they might buy, and they were beholden to Procurement’s approval process to obtain the products they wanted. We frequently talk about how the rise of informed customers is changing this dynamic for Sales, how empowered customers will refuse to buy from anyone pushy or annoying, favoring Challengers that can helpfully show them a new way forward. Interesting, the same force—the rise of informed customers—is starting to change Procurement.
To be sure, Procurement still cares about the total cost of ownership. But as informed customers have started to effectively lobby for highest-value, not lowest-cost, offerings, Procurement departments have started taking a closer look at the total value of ownership. Category managers—that is, procurement officers assigned to a narrow subset of products—have been particularly affected by this dynamic, as they are particularly attuned to the preferences of the very informed internal business partners they frequently interact with.
On the surface, Sales and Procurement’s goals appear to be at complete odds: the job of Sales is to make money by selling products at a high cost, while the job of Procurement is to save money by buying products at a low cost. This adversarial dynamic used to be completely true, but it’s only somewhat true in a world of informed customers. Both Sales and Procurement are now beholden to customers that care more about a product’s overall value and feature set than they do its price.
For possibly the first time in the history of their functions, this creates an opportunity for Sales and Procurement to partner together in a way that helps out both parties. If salespeople can help procurement officers understand the total value their products provide, they can sell more while helping procurement improve its status with their internal business partners. It will likely take years for this practice to become widespread—Sales and Procurement have been adversaries for decades, and combative habits are deeply ingrained in both functions—but informed, empowered customers will eventually prompt Sales and Procurement to partner together to bring the highest value offerings from suppliers to the people demanding them.
CEB Marketing Members, listen to these webinar replays on moving to performance-based agency compensation (co-sponsored by the Procurement Strategy Council) and crafting messages that help Procurement care more about users’ needs.
I don’t know if you’ve read my Fun Facts Friday interview, but I’m an occasional video gamer. One of my biggest weaknesses has been The Elder Scrolls series, from Morrowind and Oblivion to Skyrim and, now, The Elder Scrolls Online.



Most Sales Enablement practitioners we speak with think of Sales Enablement primarily or exclusively as ‘Sales Person Enablement’. The focus is on how to help the salesperson “consistently and systematically have valuable conversations” throughout the sales process. That’s the guidance we’ve received from Forrester and others, so who can blame us.










At BuzzPlant, one of the ways we help our clients communicate with their audience is by creating content that’s real. Content that simply rings true. It has that special little touch – one you can’t quite put your finger on. But you know it when you see it. The secret ingredient? Authenticity.





From the dawn of language to today’s ultra-fast technology culture, words have always mattered. For marketers, word usage influences how concepts are perceived and how behaviors are driven. For better or for worse, marketers have become married to certain words and phrases – and for some reason, they feel obligated to use them over and over again. The better part of this marriage is that it’s easy because it’s a cookie cutter. But the worst part is that certain repetitive phrases have lost market value over the years and are now no more than empty statements.




Social media marketing must be justified. At the end of the day, social admins must show how their efforts affected a client, or a company’s, bottom line. Testing, timing and targeting are integral in social management, but the real questions remains: How do we give value to the fleeting micro engagements that make up social media interaction?
So, what data should we measure in order to gauge social media’s effectiveness? Well, it’s a good idea to start with individual social channels and their respective engagement indicators. Are your Facebook posts attracting likes, shares or comments? Are your Tweets getting retweeted? If you’re social strategy seems like you’re shouting into space, aggressive testing is the best way to
Conversation, or connecting with two or more people to share an idea, is fundamental to social media. Yet, how can we attribute value to a conversation? One point to consider is the idea of social capital. Simplified, social capital can be described as an investment that creates unseen benefits through transparent cooperation between groups and individuals (take a second to read that again). 

Years ago I worked on a transaction with an insurance company that was an IBM mainframe client. I had gotten a foothold into the account by selling them disk drives about 6 months prior. They were the only non-IBM devices in the entire Data Center. 



Marketing a small business has become overwhelming with all the online platforms, tools and strategies. There is so much complexity with all of your choices, how do you simplify marketing so it