schwa is the spookiest English vowel because any other vowel can become it. it’s like a vowel ghost. cədaver skeləton devəl halləween autəmn
allthingslinguistic:schwa is the spookiest English vowel because any other vowel can become it. it’s...
This is wonderful news: The International Astronomical Union’s Working Group for Planetary System Nomenclature — the group of astronomers tasked with giving official names to astronomical objects and features in the solar system — have approved the naming of two craters on the Moon’s far side for the iconic “Earthrise” photo taken during the Apollo 8 mission. Even better: The craters appear in the photo and are named after the Earthrise photo itself!
The incredible photograph, from December 24, 1968 — almost exactly 50 years ago now — was the first of its kind ever taken, and shows our blue-green planet rising somberly over the stark gray Moonscape as the Apollo 8 Command Module orbited from the far side of the Moon to the near side. No human had ever seen the Earth hanging in space above the Moon like that with their own eyes. The impact on our species was profound; this photograph is actually credited for starting the environmental movement.
One of the most famous and important photographs ever taken from space: Earthrise, by Apollo 8 Lunar Module Pilot Bill Anders on December 24, 1968. Credit: NASA
Two of the craters seen in the photograph have now been named: The larger is now called “Ander’s Earthrise” and the smaller “8 Homeward.”
How poetic and lovely!
Two craters have been named after the iconic Earthrise photo taken during Apollo 8. Credit: NASA
The craters had names before, or more accurately designations: Pasteur T for the larger and Ganskiy M for the smaller. It’s common for smaller craters on the Moon to be named after larger nearby craters using letters after the larger crater’s name to designate them. In this case, Pasteur is a very large crater 233 kilometers wide, and Pasteur T (now Ander’s Earthrise) about 40 km across; Ganskiy is about 43 km across and Ganskiy M (now 8 Homeward) 14 km wide.
An image of the Moon’s far side showing the locations of craters seen in the Apollo 8 Earthrise photographs (noting what was visible in the first greyscale photo and then the second color one). Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific Visualization Studio
Both craters are on the far side of the Moon, just barely. The Moon rotates once for every time it orbits the Earth, a dance that keeps one side forever facing the Earth — the near side — and one facing away — the far side. If you are standing on the far side of the Moon the Earth never appears in your sky, whereas if you stand on the near side it’s always in the sky.
However, the Apollo 8 capsule was in orbit, about 110 km above the lunar surface. That means they could peek around the lunar edge just a bit, seeing the Earth even while technically over the far side (and watch it rise as they moved toward it). 8 Homeward is 7° around the lunar edge as seen from Earth, and Ander’s Earthrise about 10°.
This means they can’t be seen from here on Earth. They can only be observed via spaceflight. I find this fitting.
The larger crater is named after Bill Anders, the Apollo 8 Lunar Module pilot, who took the photo. For quite some time there was a controversy over who actually took it. For years the official story was that Frank Borman took it, but Anders disputed that. It turns out Anders did indeed take it, and the story behind the confusion is actually a really great one, solved due to great detective work by space historian Andy Chaikin. I suggest you take a few minutes to read that. It’ll give you even more perspective on this epic photograph.
The folks at the NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific Visualization Studio created a phenomenal simulation of what the astronauts saw using elevation data and observations from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, and Blue Marble data to simulate the Earth (courtesy Reto Stockli (NASA/GSFC)). In this animation, the Earth rises as the astronauts orbited the Moon, and it pauses twice to juxtapose the photographs taken by Bill Anders (one in grayscale, then a second in color; the delay between them occurred due to Anders having to switch the film in the camera).
It’s funny, given today’s effortless access to information (and perhaps even the overload of it) to think that in 1968 one single photograph could have such an impact. We now see so many gorgeous and awe-inspiring images sent back from space-based observatories and probes visiting asteroids and planets and moons and comets that, ironically, their individual impact is diluted visually even as their real scientific value continuously adds to our knowledge. This is why I try to take the time to highlight special ones to you, my readers, even as I sit back and drink them in on my own before I can write about them.
This is such a remarkable time, when we are learning so much so quickly about the Universe, and learning our own context inside it. It’s important, sometimes, to remember the critical moments that showed this to us.
Umarell is one of those words that people like because it references a somewhat familiar concept that their own language or variety has no easy way to name. Wikipedia has this to say about it:
Umarell (Italian pronunciation: [umaˈrɛlː]; modern revisitation of the Bolognese dialect word umarèl [umaˈrɛːl]) is a term popular in Bologna referring specifically to men of retirement age who pass the time watching construction sites, especially roadworks – stereotypically with hands clasped behind their back and offering unwanted advice. Its literal meaning is "little man" (also umarèin), and it is often pluralized in spelling by adding a final s (out of English influence).
Danilo Masotti has written a couple of books on the topic, and maintains a weblog whose main purpose seems to be to promote the books. But there are relevant articles here and there in the media, and there's apparently a band, a restaurant, and in Bologna una piazza dedicata agli 'Umarells'". So I conclude that it's a real thing and not a sort of Bolognese ozay.
[h/t Andrea Mazzucchi]
Whenever someone gets a new pair of glasses what’s the first thing everyone does? They ask how strong they are. Then usually someone asks to try them on, giving their own verdict on what the world looks through someone else’s eyes. We never expect everyone to see the same. We understand that every pair of glasses is different and that the person wearing them is unique.
So why does everyone expect a visually impaired person using a white cane or a guide dog to be totally blind?
As I talked about in my first post, embracing my long white cane was quite an emotional process. I am now using it happily, safely and confidently.
However, people do treat me differently because I use a cane. I have to deal with the negative attitudes or incorrect ideas that many people have around blindness.
Last week my good friend and fellow disability activist Chloe experienced some of these misplaced attitudes.
94% of registered blind people have some useful vision. Sight impaired cane users like Chloe & myself rely on our canes to enhance our independence & safety. Visual impairment is a spectrum, share & repeat this message so we don’t experience discrimination. https://t.co/HRJUChFGNA
— Dr Amy Kavanagh (@BlondeHistorian) October 6, 2018
Chloe started using her white cane around the same time that I did. She’s been a fantastic support throughout the process. Chloe has her own amazing blog which I thoroughly recommend.
Like me, and many other white cane users, Chloe has some useful residual vision and can read print if it’s zoomed up to the max! Check out Justin’s post on phone accessibility to learn more.
94% of visually impaired people have some useful vision! Useful vision can range from light perception or the ability to detect movement, to vision with blurred spots or dark patches. Someone might be able to see nothing in the centre of their vision but have excellent detailed vision around the edges. Often conditions like lighting or tiredness can significantly affect the quality of vision. If I look into strong sunlight I can see almost nothing except blurred light and shadows.
It’s really important to understand that we all see the world differently.
Just like Chloe when I use my phone to answer a text, pick a podcast or tweet, I regularly get stared at, tutted at or even have comments made about me. I’m often accused of “not looking blind”, whatever that means. Just look at the responses to Chloe’s tweet to get a sense of some of these experiences.
I’ve had visually impaired friends tell me about members of the public “testing” their sight loss by purposely blocking paths or moving obstacles in their way. I’ve even had people take photographs of me in public to try to get evidence of me “faking”. Regrettably, I’m not alone in this experience.
Only yesterday a man shouted at me that I was about to walk into some stairs. When I replied I knew about the steps, he instantly confronted me, demanding how I knew there were steps if I was really blind. I pointed out the tactile paving at the bottom of the stairs and he backed down.
It feels like someone is constantly trying to catch me out for cheating at a game I’m not playing.
It’s easy to say that these are just “ignorant” views or unkind people, but these daily micro aggressions can really wear down you confidence. When someone excuses these actions, citing a lack of education or awareness as a reason, it only reinforces the attitude that it is my responsibility to educate everyone. That I have to be patient in the face of prejudice.
Imagine how it feels to be challenged for just existing. Being constantly held accountable to an incorrect standard.
Placing the burden of responsibility on disabled people to educate fails to take into account the impact or risk of these incidents. These unpleasant confrontations can discourage people from using public transport or accessing their community. Also, there is the potential for the situation to progress to something aggressive.
Disability hate crime rose by 51% in the UK last year. Although these figures do indicate that more disabled people feel empowered to report incidents, it also demonstrates the presence of harmful attitudes towards disabled people.
Unfortunately, the concerns about being challenged means that disabled people often adapt their behaviour.
I’ve spoken to many visually impaired people who feel pressured to perform “blindness”. Ashamed as I am to admit it, I’ve acted as if I can see less than I can because I’m anxious about being confronted in public.
This is a behaviour I’m trying to avoid as it only reinforces the misinformed stereotypes and is deeply insulting to the visually impaired community who have total sight loss.
It is this final point that is the most infuriating. Yes it is important to understand that some visually impaired people can read a newspaper headline and also use a white cane or guide dog.
However, it is essential to understand that total sight loss does not automatically make someone useless and vulnerable. Totally blind people have jobs, they use public transport, they play sports, they have one too many pints sometimes, they have relationships, they volunteer, socialise, shop, they have children, and yes, they can still send a text message.
Visually impaired people should be able to navigate the world without being accused of faking their disability just because they are living a full and rewarding life.
So next time someone tuts at me when I use my phone, I will try to remember that their world is defined by a much narrower view than mine. Help me widen their perspective by sharing this post.
I’ve been using these over the last few months. There will be a mini-Superlinguo around some time in January!
1. I’m beginning my own longitudinal child language acquisition project
No, we’re not sending them to space.
2. I’m temporarily plural
It’s a pity that English doesn’t have a standard dual form to mark two people, which is common in other language.
3. I’m currently demonstrating an unusual form of noun incorporation
It’s 9 months of moving from inalienable to alienable possession.
4. I’m building my own language acquisition device
I apologise in advance for the poverty of the stimulus.
5. I’m taking a novel approach to illustrating the human capacity for recursion
It’s humans all the way down.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: Linguist Parent Social Media is the best social media.
This is quite something to enshrine on such a big mural, Lufthansa. Would you have allowed “people” & “look” instead of “language” & “sound”? The idea that some languages are more beautiful (& therefore more valuable) is discriminatory & wrong. All languages are of equal worth. (Lisa Davidson on twitter)
New favourite example of reduplication: Moons can have moons and they are called moonmoons.
Accurate summation of historical events:
Image description: A meme from The Good Place, where Janet explains that Columbus is in the bad place because of all the raping, slave trade, and genocide.
Two years ago today:
A newly wed Captain Awkward & Mr. Awkward walk back down the aisle while family & friends watch. Photo by Eric Lipe. Fun fact: When you get your wedding photos back and the photographer has made some of them black & white, it’s their way of saying “Nailed it!”
Daniel Striped Tiger, front, and Henrietta Pussycat, back, are getting CRIMINALLY large.
New favourite example of lexical ambiguity (from WholesomeNsuchArt).
Recent events are weighing heavily on me right now. It is so easy sometimes to despair, and to become overwhelmed by it all. Perhaps you feel the same.
For me — and I can only speak for myself here, given my own background and experience — I have to be able to back out sometimes, if even only for a short time, and find something, somewhere, that has beauty. Awe. Reverence.
Again, for me, the way this frequently occurs is when I gaze skyward. Light is the main way we understand the Universe, and when that light rains down, it can feel as if it is the Universe itself giving us clues to its structure, behavior, and origin. Because it is.
That light comes in many, many forms, but perhaps one of the most beautiful is when it emanates from an aurora.
So if you need a moment, a chance to breathe again, then please take a few minutes and watch this lushly gorgeous time-lapse video of Minnesota skies taken over the years 2010–2018 by photographer Mark Ellis, and featuring music by Dan Schwartz: "Almost Too Late."
I can wax lyrically over the causes and effects of the aurora; how the Sun streams protons, electrons, and other particles at high speed in the solar wind; how solar storms can increase that flow by huge amounts, the particle speeds approaching that of light; how the Earth's magnetic field, generated deep in the core, reaches upward and outward through the Earth's surface to guide the charged particles toward our poles; how those particles pierce our atmosphere, picking off electrons from atoms in the air, which then recombine and glow in characteristic colors, like green from oxygen and deep red and blue and purple from nitrogen, and even pink when some colors combine; and how the magnetic field sculpts them into lines, waves, and sheets that flow and flap across the sky.
I find beauty in all of this, in the understanding of this. A very large number of scientific fields overlap here, even though you might not think at first that they should — and here I include the very human pieces of this: our ability to see, to grasp, to interpret, and to appreciate. But the Universe is a tapestry, and every part affects every other.
I need to know this. The state of the world, of my country, do indeed weigh heavily on me right now. There are times I burn with an incandescent rage, and other times I feel like I've expended every erg of energy I possess, and I cannot possibly find the strength to expend more.
But then I remember all this. If I didn't have astronomy, if I didn't have the science, the wonder, the awe, the joy, the overwhelming wash of emotions I get when I see the stars, the planets, galaxies and nebulae… well. This would all be much harder for me. And even though I have never seen an aurora like those in the video for myself, just knowing they exist makes me feel better.
Beauty exists outside of us, and will continue to do so.
Again, this is what happens with me. Maybe this isn't it for you, maybe these things don't sing to your soul as they do mine. That's fine; as I've noted before, "It's ok to like things. It's even ok to like different things. It's especially ok to let others like different things than you do."
But please, find what does. Take care of yourself, take a moment to recharge, to recenter. Once you're ready, take a deep breath, steel your resolve, and then get back in there.
Madeleine Ngo, "Penn's physics department has started listing gender pronouns on its website", The Daily Pennsylvanian 9/26/2018:
Penn's Physics and Astronomy Department now lists gender pronouns on its website for some of its student, faculty, and staff members in an effort to combat stigma, encourage respectful communication, and promote the department's inclusivity.
The Diversity and Inclusion in Physics group initiated the project last semester with graduate students at the helm. In April, students and members of the department were emailed and given the option to submit their pronouns to be publicly shared on the website.
The department has been updating its website to include the responses. Physics and Astronomy Administrative Coordinator Glenn Fechner, who manages the department’s website, collected people’s pronouns and added them to each individual biography.
The article quotes one of the grad students behind the effort to the effect that "52 members of the department have their pronouns listed on the site" — I found 39 (13 she/her/her, 23 he/him/his, 3 they/them/their) but I probably missed some, perhaps due to not searching for the right pronoun choices. Participants include some of the senior faculty, like Randy Kamien and Andrea Liu, as well as more junior faculty, postdocs, graduate students, and undergraduate majors. The three who chose they/them/their include two grad students and one undergraduate.
Related efforts focused on students and staff at American colleges and universities have been around for several years. This is the first program to modify a department's website that I've heard of, but commenters will perhaps tell us about others.
I also wonder about the situation at institutions whose basic languages are French, Spanish, German, Swedish, and so on.
Today I got to tell a student that Appalachian English is a real and valid thing, after she shyly tried explaining her family’s dialect as “hillbilly English.” She told me she had never known there was a word for it.
Ya’ll, this is why teaching linguistic diversity matters.
‘Haha and hehe denote laughter in both Latin and English, and they sound like laughing when you say them.’ So says my favourite part of the grammar textbook by Ælfric (d. c 1010), Old English author + teacher (Harley MS 3271, f. 90r). -A V Hudson on twitter
Political sociologists often study how relationships and resources shape democratic institutions. Classic works like C. Wright Mills’ The Power Elite and G. William Domhoff’s Who Rules America? focused on the way wealth and status wield influence. More recent studies about think tanks and industry advocacy groups look at the current power of lobbying and thought leadership. When we talk about “big money” in politics, it is useful to understand exactly what that money is doing.
One of the challenges for studying elite influence in politics, however, is that much of this influence happens behind closed doors or hidden in a complicated bureaucracy of regulation and reporting.
This is why I’m excited about a new project led by MIT Associate Professor In Song Kim called LobbyView. The team at LobbyView has pulled together a database of lobbying reports filed under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 and made it fully searchable and downloadable. Now, you can enter an organization and see exactly what kinds of policies they work on. The results might surprise you.
For example, here are the results from a quick search for the Family Research Council—a prominent lobbying group representing the religious right. When I talk about conservative Christian advocacy, most people immediately think about pro-life policy and same sex marriage. LobbyView’s text analysis of their reports shows a much wider range of issues in their legislative advocacy.
You can also see where the money is going. Over the full range of reports collected by LobbyView, FRC has spent about 1.6 million dollars. While much of that went to issues coded under family policy, healthcare, and religion (as we would expect), they also advocate on legislation in foreign policy and defense spending.
Try it out for yourself and see what your industry is working for in Washington!Evan Stewart is a Ph.D. candidate in sociology at the University of Minnesota. You can follow him on Twitter.
I read this morning that Vince Cable intends to bring back supporters of our party. I say “bring back” because I well remember the days when we Liberal Party activists would be accompanied by people clad in bobble hats and scarves and carrying rattles, all of them in party colours.
They would cheer one’s every effort and often pass supportive comments such as "A great piece of canvassing by the Rutland peer there, Ron" or "The councillor’s passed him the bundle of leaflets and they’ve gone straight through the letterboxes." (Occasionally one would hear less obliging opinions such as “You’ll win nothing with Young Liberals” or “For me he’s delivered that too well”.)
I once asked a supporter, after we had lost a Kesteven County Council by-election by a distance, what he got from it. “We’ve had a great day out,” he replied, “and this is our cup final.”
lynati: Kory Stamper on twitter: Happy to announce I’m offering a new fall class, “Singular ‘They’...
Sign languages are often overlooked in endangered-language revitalization, but some determined individuals are working to change that - an article in The Tyee. Excerpt:
Max and Marsha Ireland live near London, Ont. They are Haudenosaunee Shawnee of the Six Nations Iroquois, which include the Oneida Nation.
Marsha is a deaf member of the Turtle Clan and will turn 60 in December. Max is 59 and a Bear Clan member. Together they have five children. Four are totally deaf, and one can hear with a hearing aid. They have nine grandchildren. Seven are deaf and only two can speak and hear.
With the help of Elder Olive Elm, the couple has come up with 250 signs, a 13-letter alphabet (just like spoken Oneida) and signs that let people count up to 100. They are determined to create an Oneida Sign Language based on Plain Indigenous Sign Language once widely used by Indigenous people, not ASL.
“It is a combination of reviving and expanding. A connection with the spoken-word Oneida. So we are developing signs that go with that. We have also included some earlier Plain Sign Language to be incorporated with that as well,” said Max Ireland.
Due to their work, the Irelands have met Indigenous people from Ontario, Quebec and B.C. Some remembered their Elders using sign language.
“They say, ‘Oh, I remember my grandmother talking like that. I remember my grandfather talking like that.’ It’s been around,” said Max Ireland.
“Like our own spoken language, it is not being promoted and used the way it should be.”
Indigenous Sign Language provides deaf First Nation individuals with a chance to participate in the community and connect with their Indigenous spoken language, he said.
linguist idea: ouija board in the international phonetic alphabet
New merch alert!
What language would we speak in space? Thanks to the Space Race, languages of space are English and Russian, and aboard the International Space Station, the astronauts and cosmonauts speak to each other in an English-Russian hybrid language, a sort of Space Pidgin. But of course, we wondered, if babies start being born in space, presumably they’d transform Space Pidgin into a fully grammatical Space Creole.
Based on the popularity of the languages of space moment in episodes 1 and 7, and the support of our patrons, Lingthusiasm has commissioned an artistic rendering of Space Babies communicating adorably with each other while they float through the cosmos, complete with tiny plush-toy Space Pigeon. (Longer story here.) Check out our linguist-turned-artist Lucy Maddox’s website for more of her ridiculously charming work.
Space Babies are fictional, but real babies on earth deserve to have support in the full spectrum of human languages. A portion of the proceeds from the Space Baby merch will be donated to the Resource Network for Linguistic Diversity.
SPACE BABY ART
Hang out with Space Babies to make your office or bedroom show off the mysteries of language and the wonders of the universe!
Wear some Space Babies around your neck to remind yourself to ponder the mysteries of language and the wonders of the universe as you go about your day!
Two Space Babies at each corner and two more in the centre of the scarf, for maximum draping versatility.
SPACE BABY PHONE CASE
Houston, we have a problem…your phone is insufficiently lingthusiastic!
Adorn your laptop, notebook, or other hard-sided case with this international array of ten frolicking Space Babies on five stickers.
Five stickers all sold together on one page, in a durable vinyl finish: we strongly recommend getting the MEDIUM or LARGE size rather than the SMALL, as the designs on the small stickers get a little fuzzy around the edges.
The intrepid lil Space Pigeon plushie as its own full-sized sticker to hang out with you on your laptop or stickerboard.
All sizes are good for the Space Pigeon, because it’s a single sticker by itself.
We couldn’t make merch with babies ON it without making it FOR babies! Space Pigeon available on baby t-shirts, short-sleeved onesies, or long-sleeved onesies, in a variety of colours. (We recommend black, navy, or dark grey for maximum Space Vibe.)
SPACE BABY/PIGEON T-SHIRTS
Space Babies (in a line OR in a circle) or Pigeon t-shirts are a subtle lingthusiastic nod as you go about your day! Adult t-shirts available in classic, fitted, and relaxed cuts on a variety of colours. (We recommend black, navy, or dark grey for maximum Space Vibe.)
SPACE BABY/PIGEON MUGS
Bring some cuteness to your kitchen or office with these mugs, available with Space Babies, or with Pigeon!
Plus, a few new non-Space Baby merch items
While we’re adding new merch, we also added a few new things in other categories!
Babies can be descriptivists too!
Enjoy this playful riff on our original NOT JUDGING YOUR GRAMMAR, JUST ANALYSING IT t-shirts, mugs, tote bags, and zippered pouches for the too-young-to-be-analyst set. Baby shirts and onesies (short and long sleeved) in light grey on a variety of colours - the perfect gift for the linguist or language-nerd friend of yours who’s having a baby!
New colours available! You can now check out scarves with an International Phonetic Alphabet print on them in white on plum, forest green, and royal blue, in addition to the existing colours of navy blue, red, olive, black, grey, light pink, teal, rainbow stripes, or rainbow with black and brown stripes.
By popular request, we’re also making IPA ties available via Zazzle - the same IPA print as the scarves, but now smaller and on a necktie for your lingthusiastic formalwear needs! (Alas, we couldn’t find anywhere that would do custom single-order bowties - if anyone knows of a Redbubble/Zazzle-equivalent for bowties do let us know!)
Here, we have a special request! We normally order sample merch items before making them publically available, to see if we want to adjust the size of the print on the actual item and any other tweaks, and so we can take photos of it to share on social media. But neither of us really wear ties, so we’re looking for a couple volunteers who are willing to order an IPA tie at a significant discount, take some photos of it when it arrives, and give us your feedback on whether we should change anything for the official version.
You do run the risk that there may be some small flaws in the tie print, but the sample items we’ve ordered for ourselves have all been totally wearable, so if you think the discount and excitement of getting to have it first is enough to outweigh that, please send us a message (email email@example.com) and we’ll send you the advance link to order. We’ll update this post with the official order link once a couple willing testers have received their ties and we’ve made any necessary tweaks!
Brought to you by Lingthusiasm: clothing and merch that’s enthusiastic about linguistics! Lingthusiasm the podcast transforms your boring commute or chores into a lively, nerdy conversation, and now you can wear your linguistics fandom on your sleeve, around your neck, and surrounding your coffee or books.
As ever, we’d love to see photos of any of the merch as part of your lives!
The Space Babies are looking good hanging out in the linguistics section of my bookshelf until I decide which wall to affix them to long-term!
I feel like in science fiction lately, there’s been an occasional tendency (though with many exceptions) for authors to adopt the style of Iain M. Banks in naming their fictional spaceships.
Before Banks came along, I feel like fictional spaceship names tended to be one or two words (of course, many of these names were based on, or in the style of, the names of real-life sea ships): Skylark; Polaris; Yamato; Enterprise; Discovery; Millennium Falcon; etc.
But then, starting in the late 1980s, Banks brought us ships with names like So Much For Subtlety, Of Course I Still Love You, and Very Little Gravitas Indeed. Some of the Culture ships did have one- or two-word names, but even those were names like Eschatologist or Gunboat Diplomat. And I feel like in recent years, a fair number of authors have followed Banks’s lead, with ship names like Hierarchy of Feasts (that page includes minor spoilers for Raven Stratagem)—though that’s not a perfect example, given that the Machineries of Empire ship names aren’t quite in the same vein as the Banksian names.
(I feel like I see Banksian ship names a lot these days, but I could be wrong about how common they are; and again, there are plenty of recent works that use brief ship names, like Rocinante and Wayfarer.)
So I was surprised but pleased just now to discover a set of spaceship names that predates Banks but that doesn’t follow the usual older-sf naming model. (Nor, of course, does it follow the Banks model.) This is from Suzy McKee Charnas’s 1980 short story “Scorched Supper on New Niger.” Helen Nwanyeruwa, the head of an interplanetary trading company that runs a fleet of ships, explains to the protagonist:
Helen smiled and nodded. “Now I remember. At the time I suggested taking slogans for [your aunt’s] ships as we do here. You know my ships’ names: In God Starry Hand; No Rich Without Tears; Pearl of the Ocean Sky. […]”
“[…] I named the ships in old style pidgin talk from Africa, in honor of my beginnings—in my ancestors’ lorry lines. All the lorries bore such fine slogans.
“My personal ship is Let Them Say. It means, I care nothing how people gossip on me, only how they work for me—”
I can’t recommend the story overall; some of its handling of race and gender issues made me wince, though it also has some lovely moments. But I liked the ship names.
Richard I thought you might think this is interesting
In exciting recent French grammar news, Belgium is modifying the rules about the agreement of the past participle, and this article about it contains some delicious grammatical judgery. Excerpt (translation mine):
Used with the auxiliary avoir “to have”, the past participle agrees in gender and in number with the direct object when it precedes it (the pancakes I have eaten). But if the complement follows the participle, it remains invariable (I ate the pancakes).
At school, children ask themselves: why before and not after? Teachers often know how to explain, but not why. The incoherence of traditional rules prevents them from giving meaning to their teaching. The average time spent on the current rules is 80 hours, to reach a level that everyone complains about. It would be so much richer to devote it to developing vocabulary, syntax, literature, morphology, or etymology. In short, to teach our children all that allows them to master the language rather than to remember the most arbitrary parts of its orthography.
Why does critical thinking stop at the threshold of spelling? Because everyone has learned not to wonder why. Finally, not everyone. The Wallonia-Brussels Federation, in agreement with its linguistic authorities, is seriously considering introducing the invariability of the past participle with the auxiliary asset. […] As for the Académie française, not being composed of linguists, it has never managed to produce a decent grammar and can not serve as a reference. […]
Here is the new rule: “The past participle, with the auxiliary être, agrees as an adjective (that is, with the word to which it refers). With the auxiliary avoir, it does not agree. […]
Oral use already follows this logic. Invariability [of the past participle] is a growing trend in all media, in all media and in all French-speaking countries. Because this agreement is no longer meaningful. It is not a question of justifying a fault, but of pointing out that this use is legitimate and that it would be unfair to punish it. Linguists will tell you: spelling is not the language, but the graphical tool that allows you to transmit the language, as a score serves for music. Since languages evolve, their writing system should do the same, which has not stopped happening in French.
I certainly remember spending a lot of time on this rule in French class, and it’s a relief to know that native speakers don’t particularly care about it either.
So in this post I want to tell you about my experience of applying for a Guide Dog. Guide Dogs as an organisation has had an amazing impact on my life over the last year. The London mobility team have been essential in supporting me and helped me reclaim so much confidence and independence!
Please note that this is just my personal experience and for more information on the Guide Dogs application process and any questions you have please check out the information here https://www.guidedogs.org.uk/faqs/guide-dogs/applications/
It never occurred to me that I would even be allowed to apply for a Guide Dog.
I was complaining about being unable to access long white cane training through my local social services and a twitter pal suggested that I contact my local Guide Dogs team. I had no idea they provided that kind of service, but I did a bit of googling and sent an email. A couple of weeks later I had a phone call booked in for an initial conversation about my vision and needs.
That phone call was the first step on an incredible journey. A lovely member of the team asked me questions about my sight loss and what I was finding difficult. She just listened to me in such an open and understanding way, that I burst into tears on the phone. It was a relief to finally be open about how I was feeling. How anxious I was, how I’d started avoiding socialising, or going to the shops or really leaving the house when I didn’t have to because I was scared of falling over, I was so tired all the time just trying to cope. How I was frightened of losing my job because I was having panic attacks on the tube. That I didn’t feel like myself anymore, that I had lost all of my confidence.
She listened to me, and explained how I could start getting some help. The best thing about Guide dogs is that they use a person centred approach, they do everything tailored to your needs and it’s all about what you can do and what you want to achieve!
The next step was that a mobility officer would come and talk to me to work out which services I would most benefit from, including potentially a guide dog.
I replied “A guide dog? But I can still see? Surely I wouldn’t qualify for a guide dog?”
The London team told me that guide dogs are not only for totally blind people and as I’m registered partially sighted I might be considered as a potential applicant. This was a total shock!
Shortly after the phone call I was assigned an orientation and mobility specialist. He turned up at my house and over 3 hours asked me a lot of questions about my vision, how I get around, what I was finding difficult and what I wanted to achieve. Yet again, he just listened to me, and when I started opening up about how I getting anxious about going out alone he replied with 3 simple words.
“That sounds hard”
And I promptly burst into tears, again. However, it was going to be ok because he had a plan! He was going to teach me how to use my long cane properly, help me plan some routes and recommend I get some additional support and training around my sight loss.
Over the next couple of months he helped me learn how to use my long cane safely and independently. He helped me plan the best route to and from work, he taught me how to cross roads safely, how to get up and down stairs and find kerbs or uneven ground. Over time, it was like he was handing me back bits of independence and pieces of confidence.
During our chat and subsequent training my mobility officer concluded that he thought I would be a good candidate for a guide dog application. However, he explained that the process was long and I would need further assessments.
The Pretend Dog
So we completed the paperwork for the guide dog application together. We talked all about where the dog would sleep, go to the toilet and all the practicalities of guide dog ownership. We listed my regular routes, including my work commute, and how I get to my volunteering and social activities. He explained about the rest of the application process and agreed to put me through to the next assessment.
A few weeks later one of the guide dog trainers visited me at home. The guide dog mobility instructor, GDMI, needed to do a mobility assessment so we walked around with my white cane and he saw how I used it. Then the GDMI got out a guide dog harness and explained that he was going to show me what it’s like to be guided by a guide dog, except that he would pretend to be the dog.
It was a bit odd! I held onto the handle and the GDMI held the other end of the harness. We walked round my local area, and got quite a lot of funny looks (according to Other Half). However, it did help me understand how it would be to be guided not by a person or using my cane but by the movements of the harness. They also filmed me to see how quickly I walk, how long my stride is and other factors that would influence the eventual match with a dog.
After the GDMI’s visit the mobility team contacted me and explained they thought the best plan was for me to attend a residential further assessment. This residential was an opportunity for me to work with some dogs in training and undergo a more detailed practical evaluation.
The assessment was at a guide dogs training school. I was part of a group of three other visually impaired ladies who were all doing the further assessment. I got the opportunity to work with lots of dogs in training to really understand what it would be like to be a guide dog owner. We did several walks with different dogs, learning about how they avoid objects, cross roads, use stairs and generally experienced the sensation of being guided by a dog.
I also had a dog stay overnight in my room which was amazing. Astar was a bouncy excitable black lab retriever cross. He was beginning his final training to be a guide dog before he would be matched with a visually impaired person. Astar was very enthusiastic and wanted to charge through doors, speed along the street and take me across roads. He obviously found my dithering a bit frustrating and wanted to show me what a good clever, if slightly fast, dog he was!
Although he was initially a bit wary of me, by the morning we were the best of pals. The minute my alarm went off and I turned the light on, I felt a little wet black nose nudging my arm. He loved his food and found it very difficult to sit still and wait for the whistle command to eat. He did a wiggly bum dance but was extremely good and patient. He did try to eat the bubbles in my bubble bath which was hilarious.
The further assessment was a lot of hard work, and required a huge amount of concentration. I did struggle to get some of the commands right, and occasionally overrode the dog, by making a decision before the dog did. It took a bit of time to really put my trust in the dogs and let them do all the work, but the more I gave over the control and allowed them to guide me, the more amazing it felt!
Throughout the two days we had lots of conversations with the trainers about the differences between using a cane and a guide dog. How much work is involved in being a good guide dog team, the limits of a guide dog and some of the downsides like being refused access to taxis or businesses. We also talked about how much smoother guide dog travel can be, fewer bumps, no more cane tangles, and how the dogs can help with the stress of some experiences.
Instead of being a test, the whole process is a really empowering opportunity to facilitate the best possible decision for you and the guide dogs team.
At the end of the second day I sat down with the team and we talked about what I wanted to do next. They told me that they thought a guide dog was the right mobility solution for me. That I would benefit from the help a guide dog could give, that it would improve my independence and really assist with some of the anxiety I get around going out on my own. However, I said that I wanted to wait a couple of days to really think about everything.
I spent a few days reflecting on the whole experience. I adore dogs, but I knew I had to choose to go on the waiting list for the right reasons.
This time spent making the decision was the most important part of the whole application. It really helped me confirm that this was something I wanted and needed.
Eventually I phoned up the Guide Dogs team and confirmed that yes, I did want to go on the waiting list and they agreed!
I made that phone call 7 months ago and I will probably be waiting another 9 months before I meet my life changer!
It’s a long hard wait. It’s likely that I will have to wait the full 18 months, but if a dog becomes available and is the right match it can happen sooner. The dog has to be just right to meet the workload, aka how much I get out and about, my walking pace, height and also have the confidence to deal with central London on a daily basis!
I’m nearly halfway through but it can’t come soon enough. The team do absolutely continue to support me, I’ve been to lots of really useful sessions and workshops which have given me more skills and confidence, which I’ll talk about another time. I love being involved with Guide Dogs, and I’m looking forward to doing some more volunteering, fundraising and campaigning with the team. However, every time I go in the office and see all the dogs in training my heart aches.
I would like people to share this post, as I wish I had known about all this support sooner. I wouldn’t have been so isolated for so long.
Guide dogs has really made me feel like part of a community, their whole ethos is about empowerment, support and independence. They have helped me embrace my disability and find a voice. I want to spread the word about their fantastic work because I am so grateful for all that they have done for me, even before I’ve got my dog!
Also this post full of pictures of cute guide dogs, and who doesn’t love an adorable assistance doggo?
If you would like to donate to guide dogs and support the amazing work that enables people like me to reclaim their independence find out more about what you can give here https://www.guidedogs.org.uk/how-you-can-help/donating/
Photograph of a high-backed chair that has gone viral on Chinese social media (as reported in this Taiwan newspaper):
China's netizens are all in a twitter over the account of a carpenter who was commissioned to make a cinnabar red high-backed chair with the finials at the top to be "in the shape of dragons' heads" (chéng lóngtóu 成龍頭). Unfortunately, he misinterpreted the directions to mean "[in the shape of] Jackie Chan's head" ("Chénglóng tóu 成龍頭").
For another translation blunder involving the Chinese name of Jackie Chan, see:
- "Jackie Chan Campus Station" (4/10/15)
For additional Jackie Chan lore on Language Log, see:
[h.t. Hiroshi Kumamoto; thanks to Daan Pan]
Once Upon a Time, the people of the United Kingdom of England and Scotland decided that their king had got too uppity and chopped his head off.
And then, being very British about it, decided that what they really wanted was another king again, thank you very much.
And some MPs thought that things should go back to just how they were, with the King having absolute power over everything.
But some other MPs said, isn’t that what caused all the bother in the first place, and maybe unfair power is something we should do something about.
And so, in the end, Liberalism was born.
Mr Dr Vince “the Power” Cable, isn’t king of the Lib Dems. But he might want to be a bit more cautious about sticking his neck out…
Today he is making a few suggestions about how to turn the Party into a Movement. And, like the “Movement Pie” in TV’s “The Preventers” it is… “strangely unappetising”.
Captain Paddy used to have what was called the “Bungee Squad”, so that when he leapt off a cliff with a new notion, they could reel him back in. This press launch of a proposal to bounce the Party into following is more Lemming Squad – take the leap and expect all the rest of us to follow.
What is behind this is Brexit – obviously – and the cowardice of MPs in government and opposition. The Tory Rebels don’t want to split the Tory Party. The Labour moderates don’t want to split the Labour Party. Their tribalism is what is preventing Parliament coming together to stop Brexit. But that is on THEM not on US.
But creating a “safe space” for disenfranchised members of OTHER PARTIES – at the further expense of our own identity – doesn’t do us any good. Or in the long run the country any good. Last time we behaved like the only adults in the room, we agreed to a coalition and were annihilated for our pains. We no longer have the political capital to do that again! And look what has happened without Liberal voices being heard in Parliament?
I WANT more Liberal voices. So I WANT people to be Liberals, to support and join the Liberal Democrats.
But I’m actually pretty AMBIVALENT about a “supporters scheme”.
On the one fluffy foot, the more the merrier. On the other fluffy foot, this is wasting a lot of time and potentially money (especially if the Leader want’s his own Special Conference to make the changes) on PROCESS when we could be spending that time and money on telling people how GREAT Liberalism is. It looks an awful lot like the Politician’s Syllogism (“Yes, Minister”): we must do SOMETHING – THIS is something – we must do THIS!
(And didn’t we say One Member One Vote would get the members more involved? Now that that’s not worked we want to get the not-even-members more involved?)
We’re not in politics just to be a bigger club for people who like being in The Politics Club. Liberals are in politics to do something DIFFERENT, or we’d just have done the easy thing and joined one of the bigger clubs in the first place.
And that’s why this Movement Pie is the wrong way round. It starts from the idea of being welcoming – which is GOOD – but offers nothing different once everybody gets there. Worse it’s more “None of the Above”
For better or worse – usually worse – that’s why the likes of Brexit or Corbyn are brilliant recruiters: because they have something exciting that appeals to converts.
Liberal Democrats need to be bolder in offering something different, something that ENTHUSES people into signing up. Liberal ideas are a beacon that inspire people, and Liberals should always welcome aboard all the new people inspired by Liberalism.
If your only big idea is to say you’ll welcome as many people as you can find but only for more of the same (but not EVIL!), you may well find that not many people will be very interested in tucking into your biggest pie ever…!
Because it’s a Pie with no FILLING.
Oh it may be EYE-CATCHING. So is any SPECTACULAR BELLY-FLOP. But is it the right answer? Is it even answering the right question?
Because the Liberal Democrats have had, let’s be honest, bit of a problem for a bit of a while now: post-joining the Coalition, no one knows what the Party stands for.
To most people The Tories stood for the people with money, Labour stood for the people without and the Lib Dems USED to stand for “the None of the Above” Party. And then we were in government and we weren’t none of the above any more.
To possibly too many of our MPs and members, we were the “Nice Moderate in the Middle Party”, not to profligate not too evil, just right. The kind of people who thought John Major was too exciting a shade of grey. And while, in the current political climate, you can see the attraction of being the “we’re not nutters” Party, it’s also heavily contributing to the belief that we are the “We stand in the middle, we’ll stand with anyone, not for anything” Party.
Saying we will welcome all and sundry, no need to sign up to our values, and we will have any leader you like so long as you like them… if ANYTHING that is MORE OF THE SAME PROBLEM.
And THIS fluffy elephant says FLUFF OFF to that!
I am a LIBERAL and I want to see my Party doing LIBERAL THINGS – taking part in Europe, cleaning up our air, standing up for people who are a bit different, challenging the RIGHT-WING consensus of Labour and Tory Parties that immigrants are bad and big government is good.
Liberalism started off by being about taking power away from central control and giving it away. It started with the biggest centre of power of them all, the divinely appointed King. But it also became about taking away the power of other bullies over people.
We talk about Human Rights, which are to protect you from a bullying government, and about workers rights which are to protect you from a bullying employer, or about protection for minorities which are to protect you from a bullying mob.
Socialists might talk about seizing power from the capitalists; conservatives might talk about protecting the status quo. But they are just arguing about who has the power. Only Liberalism wants to abolish the idea of there being someone in power.
How we give power and freedom to people are big big questions: how do we – for example – free people from poverty? Lloyd George answered that with a People’s Budget and pensions; Beverage answered it with the Welfare State; today maybe a British dividend or universal basic income might be the answer.
But the question is still relevant.
Which means Liberalism is still relevant.
Which means WE need to have an answer to prove that WE are relevant!
When I was a kid, I sometimes encountered adults who disapproved of the way I’ve just used the word ‘kid’. ‘A kid’, they would say, repressively, ‘is a baby goat’. They weren’t really objecting to the substitution of animal for human vocabulary. They just thought ‘kid’ was vulgar, a sign that the person who uttered it was uneducated and unwashed. They were using a spurious argument about language to proclaim their superiority to the common herd. They were also asserting their power, as adults, to hold young people to their standards of acceptable speech.
I was reminded of this last week when I read an article in Teen Vogue about the importance of using gender-neutral language. Clearly, I am not in the target audience for this publication, being neither a teen nor in any way voguish, and I can’t say I’ve ever looked at it before. But my interest in this particular piece was piqued after a number of people shared it on Twitter and commented on the absurdity of some of the terms it suggested—like ‘pibling’ and ‘nibling’ as gender-neutral substitutes for ‘uncle/aunt’ and ‘nephew/niece’.
I thought this was a bit unfair. I’d never come across ‘pibling’ or ‘nibling’ before, but it’s not hard to discern the logic behind them: they’re obviously modelled on ‘sibling’, a long-established word meaning ‘brother/sister’. Your ‘pibling’ is your parental sibling. I don’t know if it’ll catch on, but I don’t find it self-evidently ridiculous.
Anyway, I decided to read the Teen Vogue article for myself. And it got me thinking, not only about the perennially fraught relationship between activists of different generations, but also about the history of this type of verbal hygiene. Advice on using gender-neutral language has been around for over 40 years: the earliest English examples date back to the 1970s when I was still a teenager. So, what’s changed, what hasn’t changed, and what does it all mean?
What surprised me most was how much of the article could have been lifted from something written 40 years ago. Both the selection of ‘problematic’ forms and the suggested gender-neutral alternatives reminded me of classic second-wave feminist texts like Casey Miller and Kate Swift’s 1976 book Words and Women and their later Handbook of Nonsexist Writing, which was first published in 1980 (there’s a fuller account of the two women’s work in this 1990s interview). Teen Vogue suggests a number of substitutions which I’m sure English-speaking feminists of my vintage will recognise:
• Humankind instead of mankind
• People instead of man/men
• First-year student instead of freshman
• Machine-made, synthetic, or artificial instead of man-made
• Flight attendant instead of steward/stewardess
• Salesperson or sales representative instead of salesman/saleswoman
• Server instead of waiter/waitress
• Firefighter instead of fireman
This list echoes the preoccupations of the earliest nonsexist language guidelines, which put particular emphasis on avoiding (a) terms like ‘fireman’ and ‘mankind’, which incorporated ‘-man’ (thus excluding women or implying that men were the norm); and (b) terms like ‘waitress’ that were formed by adding a feminine suffix to the generic/masculine form (this explicit gender-marking was considered both gratuitous and demeaning). Many of these terms were occupational labels, and that reflected one of the key feminist concerns of the time: combatting discrimination in employment. In Britain, where sex-discrimination became illegal in the mid-1970s, the new law required employers to use nonsexist terms in job ads. You couldn’t just advertise for a ‘salesman’ on the basis that ‘man’ included everyone, you had to spell out that women were welcome to apply by using either paired terms (‘salesman/woman’) or a neutral alternative (like ‘salesperson’). But it’s odd to see some of the old advice on job-titles being recycled in 2018. When did anyone last call a member of the cabin crew on an aeroplane a ‘stewardess’? Who still thinks of ‘firefighter’ as one of those newfangled PC terms?
On the other hand, this recycled list is a reminder that the old project of replacing male-centred with neutral terms was only partially successful. Four decades of complaints haven’t made ‘freshman’ obsolete, for instance, or ‘man/mankind’. The list also made me think of the failed experiments which are always part of the history of any kind of verbal hygiene–all the proposed replacements for traditional sexist terms which didn’t make it into the mainstream, and are now largely forgotten. ‘Genkind’, anyone? How about ‘waitron’?
But while a lot of the actual terms on Teen Vogue‘s list are the same ones feminists discussed 40 years ago, the article’s framing of the issue is very different. Gender-neutral language is not presented as a specifically feminist concern, and the problem it’s meant to solve is not defined primarily as one of sexism. Instead, the main reason given for adopting neutral terms is, in the words of gender therapist Dara Hoffman-Fox, that
Using gendered terms […] is highly presumptuous, especially in today’s society, in which many persons are aware that they don’t identify as male or female and therefore are uncomfortable with this type of language.
In the past, feminists who advocated neutral terms weren’t trying to avoid making unwarranted assumptions about the gender of individuals. Their aim was to challenge the more general presumption of maleness as the human default. That presumption has not yet withered away, but for readers of the Teen Vogue generation concern about it has been at least partially displaced by newer concerns about respecting individuals’ identities and making those outside the conventional male/female binary feel ‘more included and safe among us’.
This explains the presence in the article of some less familiar terms, like ‘pibling’ and ‘nibling’. Kinship terms in general didn’t feature prominently in old-style nonsexist language guidelines, since although they are gender-differentiated, they do not invite the objection feminists had to pairings like ‘waiter/waitress’, that the masculine term is unmarked and the feminine by implication a deviation from the norm. The only difference between ‘aunt’ and ‘uncle’, or ‘niece’ and ‘nephew’, is that one denotes a female relative and the other a male one. But if your main concern is to include people who identify with neither of those possibilities, it becomes a problem that there is no term you can use that doesn’t specify the relative’s sex. What do you call your mother’s nonbinary sibling or your brother’s agender child?
This is the gap neologisms like ‘pibling’ are meant to fill. At the moment the inventory of gender-neutral kinship terms is still a work in progress, a matter of people independently constructing wordlists and putting them online. Their proposals are many and varied, and some of them are clearly destined to join the list of failed experiments I mentioned earlier (if you find yourself adding a note like ‘also the name of a musical instrument’ or ‘cute term for penis in French’ you probably haven’t got a viable candidate). But if enough people have a use for terms that do this job, a consensus will begin to emerge on which forms are best suited to the task.
For me, though, the most interesting question the Teen Vogue piece raised about continuity and change in gender-related verbal hygiene was not about the words themselves, nor even about the arguments for using or not using neutral terms. It was more about attitudes to linguistic authority—about who can prescribe to whom, and how they should go about it.
Casey Miller and Kate Swift were initially very reluctant to embark on what became the Handbook of Nonsexist Writing. They didn’t want to be seen as the ‘word police’, telling people ‘Do This or Don’t Do That!’ This attitude was not unusual: the authors of non-sexist language guidelines often disclaimed any intention to be prescriptive. Their aim, they said, was not to impose new standards, but only to help writers achieve in practice the kind of accurate and unbiased writing they already believed to be desirable in theory. What could be more inaccurate and biased than the erasure of half the population? Drawing attention to the problem and giving advice on how to avoid it was just removing an obstacle in the path of good writing. I always found this rhetoric disingenuous–of course writing guidelines are prescriptive, what would be the use of them otherwise? But it needs to be understood in the context of the time.
Before the digital revolution, it was not possible to experiment with new conventions or terminology in the ways people routinely do now. Today you can (literally) spread the word via tumblr or Urban Dictionary, but in the print era, if you wanted innovations to acquire mainstream currency, you needed the support of gatekeepers like publishers, newspaper editors, and the producers of educational materials like school textbooks or college writing handbooks. These gatekeepers were predominantly men, many were linguistically conservative, and at a time (the 1970s) when second-wave feminist militancy was at its peak, they were inclined (though there were exceptions) to view demands for nonsexist language as threatening and ‘extreme’. In those circumstances it was politic for feminists to tread lightly. And of course, there is always a reason for women to be cautious about claiming authority. When they don’t downplay their expertise, as we saw in the #immodestwomen row earlier this year, they are liable to provoke hostility and resentment.
Teen Vogue, however, does not tread lightly. Channelling the spirit of our contemporary online call-out culture, it actively encourages word-policing:
Don’t be afraid to correct those around you, such as your classmates and even teachers, about using exclusive, gendered language… Depending on the situation, you can address the situation with the person publicly or privately, in person or through a message.
You could see this as a positive development–young women being exhorted to exercise authority directly and unapologetically–but in this context I don’t think it’s good advice. There may be cases where something does need to be challenged on the spot (if it was not only highly offensive but also clearly deliberate and malicious), but in most situations I think you should resist the urge to ‘correct those around you’. Not only is this interpersonally risky, it’s also very often counterproductive. Nothing is less likely to make a speaker change their attitudes than being scolded or publicly shamed for using ‘forbidden’ words. I learned that long before I was a linguist, from every adult who ever told me that ‘a kid is a baby goat’.
Teen Vogue, of course, is imagining the opposite scenario, in which an adult takes instruction from a teenager. I think this speaks to a more general cultural shift since my own teenage years. The authority to set linguistic standards is no longer seen to lie exclusively with parents, teachers and other adults: on some questions, including questions about what terms are politically acceptable or progressive in relation to subjects like gender, it’s now widely assumed that the old should defer to the young.
It’s also widely assumed that since the young will outlive their elders, their standards will eventually prevail. But one thing this glosses over is that you can’t generalise about what young people think, about language or gender or anything else. There are political differences and disagreements within as well as between generations. An example is the ongoing conflict about whether it’s exclusionary to use the term ‘women’ in discussions of abortion, pregnancy or menstruation. It wouldn’t be true to say that gender-neutral alternatives like ‘pregnant people’ and ‘menstruators’ are uniformly favoured by younger feminists and uniformly opposed by older ones: the issue divides opinion across generations. That was also true for some of the reforms feminists proposed in the past. I said before that the history of verbal hygiene is full of failed experiments; it’s also full of unfinished arguments and unresolved conflicts.
Teen Vogue’s brand of verbal hygiene isn’t identical to what preceded it, but nor is it so different as to be unrecognisable. And while I may not love everything about it, I do think this article is doing something worthwhile: introducing a new generation to the idea that thinking critically about language is part of the larger project of creating ‘a society in which all people — regardless of gender, sexuality or race — have equal opportunities and freedoms’. The route may have changed, but the destination is the same.
- Cira Gonda, translated by Diogo Almeida, about the fire at Brazil’s National Museum.
On September 15, 2017, the Cassini spacecraft plunged into Saturn, burning up after a stunning 13 years of orbiting the ringed wonder. That planet, those moons, those rings… everything Cassini saw and experienced and sent back to us humans on Earth was gasp-worthy and awe-inspiring. We had never seen the like, and it may be decades before we do again.
At the time, many electrons were spilled over the amazement we all felt from the mission, and the bittersweet emotions from the spacecraft’s demise. My own feelings were easy to recount; Saturn has been a big part of my life for decades, and was in no small way an impetus for me to seek out a career in astronomy.
As the one-year anniversary next week approaches, more articles will be written, I’m sure. And there will be galleries of images too. Of course there will be! A picture is worth a thousand words, as the saying goes…
… and sometimes they’re worth just one word. And in this case, that word is “no.”
Artwork — yes, ARTWORK — depicting a view “over the shoulder” of the Cassini spacecraft during one of the last dives toward Saturn it made before the end of the mission. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech
That image is making the rounds on social media right now, and the claim is that it’s the last image Cassini took. For example, this tweet — which has over 5,000 retweets and 12,000 “likes” as I write this, and may be from a bot — says, “Cassini's last image before entering Saturn's atmosphere and burning up.”
The only problem? It’s not.
It’s a painting. Artwork. It was put out by NASA/JPL in April 2017, long before Cassini burned up. It’s gorgeous, to be sure, but it’s a drawing. It was meant to promote the last few orbits of the mission, when Cassini took a series of extremely low plunges above Saturn’s cloud tops, coming within 4,000 kilometers to as close as 1,600. It did that a staggering 22 times — the last five actually passing through the upper parts of the atmosphere — before the Final Dive.
The painting is lovely, but there are a few things that give away its unreal pedigree. For one, the cameras on Cassini were mounted in such a way that the spacecraft itself couldn’t be seen. You don’t generally want the high-gain antenna blocking your view of some important feature on a moon or in the rings. Self-photobombing is frowned upon in such circumstances.
Also, at that close to the planet I’d think the spacecraft would be moving so rapidly that much of the fine detail would be blurred even in short exposures. On top of that, the planet is bright, as are the rings, so seeing any stars at all in the same image would be nearly impossible, let alone hundreds of them. That’s artistic license, and I’m fine with it, but these are all pretty good clues it’s not an actual image.
I do love this digital painting. But we should get this right.
So what was Cassini’s final image? This:
The actual last image Cassini took of Saturn before its final plunge. This was taken on September 14, 2017 when the spacecraft was 634,000 kilometers above the cloud tops. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute
That monochrome shot was taken on September 14, 2017, less than a day before Cassini burned up. It shows a region of Saturn on the planet’s night side, and includes the part where Cassini fell in. The illumination is from the rings themselves, reflecting sunlight onto the planet’s unilluminated hemisphere. This image was taken from a height of 634,000 kilometers (a little less than twice the distance the Moon is from Earth), and you can see some of the ghostly faint inner rings near the bottom.
Quite a few images were taken at this time, and many were in different filters, allowing a natural color composite to be made, too:
A “natural color” image created using red, green, and blue filters shows the area of Saturn where Cassini would burn up. These were the last few images Cassini took in the mission. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute
Saturn’s atmosphere has a layer of haze above it, which mutes the bands and storms you’d otherwise see. Jupiter doesn’t have such a layer, which is why its weather is so much more obvious. Compared to that, Saturn looks almost subdued.
But that’s in visible light. At around the same time a camera called the Visible and Infrared Mapping Spectrometer took an image at a wavelength of 5 microns, about 7 times longer than the reddest light our eyes can see. This type of thermal imaging shows heat leaking up from the interior of Saturn, while the cold clouds above it block that light so they appear dark, silhouetted against it:
A thermal infrared image of Saturn taken by Cassini shortly before the end of mission shows heat radiating up from the planet’s interior; clouds block that heat and so they show up as dark. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona
The oval shows the location where Cassini came in a few hours later.
Incredible. That’s another planet, over a billion kilometers away! I think it’s worth at least a few minutes of your time to peruse these images, think about the mission, and bask in the glow of being able to at least somewhat satiate our natural human curiosity about the Universe around us.
But when we do, we should do it right. We owe it, if not to the spacecraft itself, then to the hundreds of people who worked on it, some for their whole careers. Cassini was an avatar for us, a representative of us, and it represented the best of us. Let’s give it and them their due.
Artwork depicting the final moments of the Cassini spacecraft on Setpember 15, 2017, as it burned up in the atmosphere of Saturn. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltechhttps://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/resources/7635/breakup-illustration/